1 / 60

Tests & Quizzes (aka SAMigo )

On June 16, 2011, Christine Doherty presented a comprehensive agenda on the future of Tests & Quizzes (T&Q) at Stanford University. The discussion focused on development dilemmas, community contributions, and the importance of user experience reviews. Key highlights included the integration of Respondus, the ability to record average scores for multiple submissions, and enhanced feedback options for instructors. The presentation emphasized the need for clear specifications for new features and streamlined project management to improve user interaction while reducing UI clutter.

will
Télécharger la présentation

Tests & Quizzes (aka SAMigo )

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Tests & Quizzes (aka SAMigo) Christine Doherty, Stanford University June 16, 2011

  2. Agenda • Future of T&Q: Development Dilemmas • Community Contribution • 2.8 Highlights • 2.9 Plans • Q&A

  3. Future of T&Q: Development Dilemmas

  4. Guiding Principles Flexibility/Freedom Reliability/Error-Free

  5. Development Focus Improve UI/Interaction Add New Features

  6. Project Management Stanford as Gatekeeper Modularize/Distribute

  7. Community Contribution

  8. New Release Process http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/confluence/display/SAM

  9. Rationale • User experience reviews are critical: • New features can cause clutter in UI, confusion, bad user experience • New features can clash with existing or planned features and lead to unexpected behavior • Stanford only has one designer to tackle the workload, so we need help

  10. Requirements for Contributions Clear specs are a must: • Rationale for new feature/enhancement • Description of expected behavior • Documentation of all affected screens • Screen shots desirable

  11. Timeline

  12. 2.8 Highlights

  13. RespondusIntegration before 2.8 Respondus Sakai – T&Q Question Types Changed Missing Metadata

  14. RespondusIntegration in 2.8 Sakai – T&Q Respondus QTI XML or Zip file from Respondus Imports to Sakai Tests & Quizzes

  15. Respondus Integration

  16. Respondus Integration

  17. Respondus Integration Respondus Sakai – T&Q Respondus Sakai – T&Q

  18. Record Average Score • New Feature: ability to record average score for multiple submissions • Redesigned UI for student’s Submitted Assessments list to accommodate displaying average scores • Contributed by Rice University

  19. Record Average Score

  20. Record Average Score

  21. Record Average Score

  22. Record Average Score

  23. Record Average Score

  24. Record Average Score

  25. Record Average Score

  26. Record Average Score

  27. Record Average Score

  28. Release Scores Only • Based on feedback from instructors wanting to show students their scores without allowing them to see questions again (since questions are reused in subsequent tests) • Solution is to separate out scores from rest of feedback options

  29. Release Scores Only to Students

  30. Release Scores Only

  31. Clarification of Settings

  32. Send zero scores to Gradebookfor non-submission records • Clash of scoring rules in Tests & Quizzes and Gradebook caused inability to set zero scores for non-submission records for inclusion in course grade calculation • Solution is to allow instructors to explicitly enter a zero score for a non-submission record that gets sent to gradebook • Patch contributed by Longsight

  33. Send zero scores to Gradebookfor non-submission records

  34. Send zero scores to Gradebookfor non-submission records

  35. Send zero scores to Gradebookfor non-submission records

  36. Send zero scores to Gradebook

  37. Send zero scores to Gradebookfor non-submission records

  38. Send zero scores to Gradebookfor non-submission records

  39. Send zero scores to Gradebookfor non-submission records

  40. Rich Text Entry for Short Answer/Essay • Instructors from several institutions requested a way for students to enter rich text in essay questions for equations, foreign characters, or just general formatting • Solution is to present students with the ability to use the FCKeditorin Short Answer/Essay questions. • Contributed by Longsight

  41. Rich Text Entry for Short Answer/Essay

  42. Rich-text for Short Answer

  43. Rich-text for Short Answer

  44. Publish Action • Based on feedback that Settings and Publish actions were redundant, both leading to Settings page • Solution is to link Publish action to Publish Assessment page where settings are verified and notification added (if desired)

  45. Publish Action

  46. Publish Action

  47. Publish Action

  48. Publish Action

  49. Remove Assessment Types • Assessment Types often prove to be confusing to instructors, since they may not know what the labels mean and what settings go with them • One solution is to remove any trace of assessment types with a sakai property (samigo.showAssessmentTypes=False) • Contributed by Longsight

  50. Remove Assessment Types

More Related