1 / 21

Single shot test beam at PS ! Simulation of a beam loss!

Joint ad venture of CMS and ATLAS. Single shot test beam at PS ! Simulation of a beam loss!. Joint venture of CMS and ATLAS. Can we even imagine a beam „ lost “ in IP1 or IP5?. Some LHC numbers. Proton energy 7 TeV Particles per bunch 10 11 Number of bunches 2835

willa
Télécharger la présentation

Single shot test beam at PS ! Simulation of a beam loss!

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Joint adventure of CMS and ATLAS Single shot test beam at PS!Simulation of a beam loss! Joint venture of CMS and ATLAS General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  2. Can we even imagine a beam „lost“ in IP1 or IP5? Some LHC numbers • Proton energy 7 TeV • Particles per bunch 1011 • Number of bunches 2835 • Stored beam energy 336 MJ • Beam current 0.5 A • Failure: magnet quench; power converter fail, etc. dipole or quadrupol failure decaying B-field  need to dump • Revolution time: 90µs • Abort gap: 3,17µs • Kicker rise time: 3µs Can we imagine a dump failure? General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  3. LHC layout and hint for beamloss reason IP5 • Mika Huhtinen: • Single module prefire:very unlikely • Assumption only one of the • 14 abort kicker fires •  4*10^13 protons lost in IP 5 • Unsynchronized abort: very likely • Assumption one of the dump • kickers does not hit the abort gab •  bunch swept out for ~3µs; • some deviated bunches • continue in the machine • 1*10^12 protons lost in IP 5 • MC: STRUCT;MARS;FLUKA IP6 !!DUMP near to IP5 (CMS)!! General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  4. ! RA EPAC02 Improbable things are not impossible! • Both prefire and unsynchronized accidents happend at the TEVATRON! • BUT: Less critical at the TEVATRON! • They are improbable at LHC!!??!! General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  5. 8cm Beam conditions at the PS cut • Fast extraction => spill ~ 100 ns duration • Up to 1011 protons per spill(109 to 1010/ cm²) • 24 GeV protons • Beam spot: Starting 2-3cm diameter beam spot, but we expect to be able to tweak the last quadrapole to have cigar shaped beam spot. • We are currently investigating if a 10cm diameter spot possible? • Dosimetry to be handled by T7 group (secondary emission counter, gold or nickel foils). • beam available for 8 hour shift, installation 1.5 days • beam conditions fixed: 26.7.02 General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  6. T7 Area General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  7. THE WHY!?! • No integral effect expected (worst case = 10 days) • But large instantaneous ionization! 1011MIPS • Will our modules survive a beamloss? • Is our design robust? • Simple YES/NO test! • What is the dynamic behaviour? • Possible failure analysis! ALL PARAMETERS will be dynamically checked slow (10µs) and fast (50ns) (Scopes/FADCs) General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  8. Specific Questions • Will the hybrid survive? • ..............sensor survive? • ..........complete module survive? • Disentanglement of components!! • How many beam losses are digestable? • Check for bias voltage dependencies? • Which component of the components breaks, if any? General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  9. Setup • cooling box available (-10°C) (thanks to ATLAS) • 2 devices per carrier • devices premounted in carrier incl. patch panel General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  10. Carrier 3 ready in KA General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  11. Scenario • Place carrier (DUT) in cold box • Full characterizationin situ • SINGLE 100ns beam spill • Full characterization in situ • 2.-4. with different conditions • Place new carrier (DUT) ...(3 boxes=times).....etc. • Full characterization in home lab; hopefully NO failure analysis  General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  12. 3 carriers / tests • 1st carrier: HPK-sensor + hybrid(flex) Vbias ramp : one shot per ramp point (0..100V in steps of 20V and 100..400V in 50V-steps) • 2nd carrier: ST-sensor + good TEC module • 3rd carrier: HPK-sensor + KA prototype TEC module • (some pinholes, current..) after ~30 consecutive beam dumps: detect if the module is still alive! General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  13. HV: voltage&current! HV: voltage&current! Single strip current! (also check for Rpoly) Voltage over CC: Pinholes? CCbreak>120V (also check for potential on APV) 0V Single strip current! (also check for Rpoly) Readoutstrips Voltage over CC: Pinholes? CCbreak>120V (also check for potential on APV) +400V Parameters on sensors • Ionisation: completely destroy field configuration/depletion! • Sensor is short circuited!  worst case 400V on CC!! • Furtunately the power supplies will not react on that time scale! • Still: Dynamics are complicated and we will try to measure them! General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  14. Sensor parameter • HV: bias voltage • Ileak: global leakage current • VAC_DC: Voltage between AC and DC-pads of several groups of strips. 2 or 3 groups are planned! • IDC_biasresistor: also done for 2 or 3 groups of strips • Iguard: current possibly induced in the guard ring • = 9 parameters (3 groups) • sensors on PCB (circuit discussed with RH) •  allparameters measured with scopes or FADCs General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  15. Strip parameters Single strip current measurement Scope (measure I) Scope (measure V) Voltage over SiO2 to estimate pinhole development General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  16. Test on hybrid (bare and on module) Parameters: • V250: 2.5V hybrid supply voltage • I250 • V125: 1.25 supply voltage • I125 = 4 parameters (measured with scopes) • (voltages refer to hybrid ground level) • Readout • Standard: APV: Noise, ped, calib General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  17. Readout in situ (APV,module) • Use own Karlsruhe CMS-like readout system (good knowledge of the software) • Prequalification with normal procedures: pedestal, noise, common mode, calibration, LED, laser? • TRIGGER: increase of sensor leakage current • send APV reset • when APV tickmarks are found: • send software triggers and search for header • monitor baseline behaviour if header is found • Laser response? • LED response • Later: full qualification (noise,ped,calib,LED)! General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  18. Module parameters • all hybrid parameters • HV + Ileak • Full readout • LED and perhaps laser response • = 6 parameters (measured with scopes) Reminder: one SINGLE shot  full qualification! Carrier 2&3: Sensor+module will sum up to 30 scope channels! General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  19. Readout adventure Readout over 30m of cables! • Optical readout: Most promising and probably the only reasonable • Still parts missing • So far NO experience in KA • Cat. 7 network cable (needed anyhow for control) (backup 1) • PC in the „hot“ area, controlled via LAN (backup2) Cables have to be installed! Power supply combined effort with ATLAS General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  20. One shot schedule Possible time slots Duration =8 hours (max) Set up of One-shot beam Time required =1.5 days Conditional on successful replacement of PS power supply and re-establishment of slow extraction beam line FIRST 100ns beam extraction ever done at the PS (standard ~ms) General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

  21. Summary • Our electronics plus detectors should be prepared to survive fast pulses with several orders of magnitude higher particle rates than in nominal conditions. • We „SHOOT“ a hybrid, 2 modules, 3 sensors with 1011 protons several times varying the bias voltage! • We are aware that the existing program is veryambitious and the available time is tight, therefore help is welcome! • Additional ideas/devices like a CCU is feasible, if additional groups join the venture! • Scopes still needed! • The project is a joint adventure of CMS & ATLAS • The LHCC referee welcomes the project General Tracker Meeting 07/2002 Frank Hartmann

More Related