1 / 8

Modification Proposal 136

Modification Proposal 136 ‘Reconciliation following AQ Amendment where an SSP becomes an LSP prior to calculation of Provisional Annual Quantity’. Background. Modification Proposals 094, 095 & 096 were raised in July 2006

williamshirley
Télécharger la présentation

Modification Proposal 136

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Modification Proposal 136 ‘Reconciliation following AQ Amendment where an SSP becomes an LSP prior to calculation of Provisional Annual Quantity’

  2. Background • Modification Proposals 094, 095 & 096 were raised in July 2006 • Each sought to remove one of three exclusions to the Mod 640 arrangements. Code ref. E7.4.3 (a) (b) & (c) • Mods 094 & 095 were approved in October 2006, however Mod 096 was rejected • This proposal seeks to address the concerns raised in the Authority’s decision letter dated 30th October 2006

  3. Modification Proposal 096 • Within their decision letter, the Authority made reference that: ‘… the exclusion contained within E7.4.3 (c) and the ability to avoid the revision charge provides an incentive on shippers to proactively monitor and pursue threshold crosser appeal’. • The decision letter further stated: ‘…in addition to correctly allocating costs to the individual LSP rather than the RbD sector at an earlier stage, we also consider that this should provide administrative efficiencies, encouraging appeals to be made throughout the year, rather than concentrated in the post-provisional AQ window’.

  4. Modification Proposal 136 • The remaining exclusion however also provides a perverse incentive upon Shippers to ensure that appeals are concluded prior to, and as close as possible to, the post-provisional AQ window. • All Supply Points which have had successful appeals, prior to the post-provisional AQ window, will be excluded from the subsequent End of Year Reconciliation calculations and will not be subject to the resulting Annual Quantity Revision Difference Transportation Charges. • This perverse incentive is further magnified as approximately 80% of annual consumption takes place during the winter months, within a window which begins at the commencement of the new Supply Point AQ (1st October) and the date when Provisional Annual Quantity calculations are undertaken by the xoserve (end of March).

  5. Modification Proposal 136 • Therefore all successful threshold crosser appeals undertaken within this window, will have a significant and detrimental impact to the RbD sector, due to the profile of annual gas consumption. • This impact is compounded where appeals are undertaken at the last possible moment, where reads are taken at the end of the winter consumption period. • This proposal seeks to maintain the incentives on Shippers to proactively monitor and pursue threshold crosser appeals, but also remove the existing perverse incentives. • It is proposed that that where a successful threshold crosser appeal takes place, regardless of when the appeal is undertaken, that the Supply Point will not be excluded from the End of Year Reconciliation calculations.

  6. Modification Proposal 136 • This will ensure energy is allocated appropriately across market sectors and that the RbD sector is not exposed to undue volumes of unreconciled energy. • As an incentive upon Shippers to undertake threshold crosser appeals, the modification further proposes that the Supply Point will not be exposed to the full resulting Annual Quantity Revision Difference Transportation Charge, but instead will only be charged a proportion of this charge, the proportion being 90%.

  7. Modification Proposal 640 Adjustments • For the 2004/5 Gas Year the unreconciled volume associated with this particular exclusion was 205,916 MWh. • Based upon Mod 640 reconciliation invoices for the 2004/5 Gas Year, non-reconciliation of the above volume represents c£3m of misallocated charges between the SSP and LSP markets.

  8. Next Steps • Submission of proposal back to the April Modification Panel with recommendation to issue for consultation.

More Related