1 / 12

Safety of 1.8 mm Microincision Cataract Surgery in Intraoperative Floppy-Iris Syndrome Cases

Mitchell A Jackson MD Lake Villa IL USA mjlaserdoc@msn.com. Safety of 1.8 mm Microincision Cataract Surgery in Intraoperative Floppy-Iris Syndrome Cases. Relevant financial disclosure: Member Bausch + Lomb speaker’s bureau. Intraoperative Floppy Iris Syndrome (IFIS).

willis
Télécharger la présentation

Safety of 1.8 mm Microincision Cataract Surgery in Intraoperative Floppy-Iris Syndrome Cases

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mitchell A Jackson MD Lake Villa IL USA mjlaserdoc@msn.com Safety of 1.8 mm Microincision Cataract Surgery in Intraoperative Floppy-Iris Syndrome Cases Relevant financial disclosure: Member Bausch + Lomb speaker’s bureau

  2. Intraoperative Floppy Iris Syndrome (IFIS) • First described by Chang and Campbell in 20051 • Excessive billowing/floppiness of mid-peripheral iris may lead to: • Iris prolapse at main and/or side incisions • Progressive miosis • Poor preoperative pupil dilation • Complication rate overall is 77%2 • Posterior capsule rupture/vitreous loss (23%) • Iris trauma (52%) • 49% of ophthalmologists would have their own cataract removed first-even at early stage-prior to starting tamulosin (1) Chang D, Campbell J. JCRS 2005;31:664-67.(2) Chang D et al. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:1201-1209.

  3. IFIS • Well established with systemic use of alpha-1 adrenergic antagonists • Tamsulosin (Flomax), Silodosin (Rapaflo) – BPH tx • Can even occur with nonspecific alpha-1 antagonists • Terazosin (Hytrin), Doxazosin (Cardura), Alfuzosin (Uroxatral) • Alpha-1a receptor subtype predominates in prostate and iris dilator muscle • Stopping treatment preop is unpredictable and IFIS has been reported for up to several years after stopping tamulosin

  4. Current Treatment Options • Masket1 • Preoperative atropine 1% drops tid for 1-2 days • Intraoperative 1:2500 epinephrine hydrochloride • Potential acute urinary retention so don’t stop tamulosin • Packard2 and Shugar3 • Intracameralphenylephrine/epinephrine preservative-free solutions in appropriate diluted mixture • Bimanual microincisional cataract surgery with its smaller, tighter incisions plus keeping irrigation inflow anterior to the iris may also lessen IFIS4 (1) Masket S, Belani S. JCRS 2007;33:580-582. (2) Gurbaxani A, Packard R. Eye 2007;21:331-332. (3) Shugar J. JCRS 2006;32:1074-1075. (4) Chang D, Campbell J. JCRS 2005;31:664-67.

  5. Current Treatment Options • OVD “donut” in anterior chamber1 • Cohesive OVD (Healon 5) peripherally and dispersive OVD (Viscoat) centrally • Dispersive OVD resists aspiration, delaying evacuation of cohesive OVD over the iris • Mechanical expansion devices • Most are bulky and difficult to position in small pupils (<4 mm) or shallow anterior chambers • Newer Malyugin rings limited to 2.2 mm incision size • Iris Retractors/Hooks • Subincisional (main and side) hooks (4) retract iris downward and out of path of phaco tip and 2nd instrument (Diamond configuration)2 • Subincisional hook (1) at main incision with adequately dilated pupil3 (1) Chang D et al. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:957-64. (2) Oetting T, Omphrov L. JCRS 2002;28:596-598. (3) Tint et al JCRS 2009;35:1849-1852.

  6. My Technique • Simple and efficient • Combine microincision cataract surgery (MICS) through 1.8 mm incision with: • Single iris hook if pupil dilation is good • Diamond 4-hook technique if pupil dilation is poor • Stellaris fluidics provides high level of chamber stability • Tight seal of MICS seems to minimize iris prolapse toward phaco incision

  7. Evaluation • Retrospective review of 20 eyes of patients who were prescribed tamulosin • Good pupil dilation • Planned uncomplicated 1.8 mm coaxial MICS with Stellaris system • Topical and intracameral anesthesia only

  8. See Video

  9. Data Summary • No complications • No posterior capsular/zonular compromise or vitreous loss • No iris trauma or pigmentation changes • Phaco times approached those of non-tamulosin cases reported in Stellaris system evaluation

  10. Stellaris Evaluation1488 cases from 46 MD’s in 13 countries Data from Bausch + Lomb

  11. Conclusions • Stellaris 1.8 mm coaxial MICS and single subincisional iris retractor maintains stable anterior chamber with minimal to no iris prolapse • With poorly dilated pupil, use 4 hooks in diamond configuration • Phaco efficiency and times essentially unchanged with tamulosin cases acting like and approaching safety rates of non-tamulosin cases

  12. Tamulosinin Cataract Surgery not so bad after all!

More Related