1 / 45

Board Planning Session

Municipal Gas Authority of Georgia. Board Planning Session. Kennesaw, GA March 21, 2011. Agenda. 2010 Financial Results G&A True-up Swing Supply Charge Capacity Management Credits Storage Programs Long-Term Supply Projects 2010 Corporate Goal and Incentive Compensation Plan

wilmer
Télécharger la présentation

Board Planning Session

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Municipal Gas Authority of Georgia Board Planning Session Kennesaw, GA March 21, 2011

  2. Agenda • 2010 Financial Results • G&A True-up • Swing Supply Charge • Capacity Management Credits • Storage Programs • Long-Term Supply Projects • 2010 Corporate Goal and Incentive Compensation Plan • Proposed 2011 Corporate Goal

  3. Agenda • Conasauga Shale Supply Opportunity in Georgia • Portfolio III Investments in Member Debt • Draft 2016 Strategic Plan • 2010 Audit Results* – Meeting with Ernst & Young (Tuesday morning before MGAG Board Meeting) * Discussion Materials to be Provided at the Meeting

  4. 2010 Financial Results • Actual net G&A represents a favorable variance from budget of $52,000 • The overall favorable variance is comprised of the following: • Unfavorable variance of approximately $139,000 on G&A expenses • Due primarily to office expansion costs incurred to support new PGP services • Favorable variance of approximately $47,000 in Revenue Credits due to • Higher than expected revenues from interest income and Main Street administrative fees • Offset somewhat by reserved amounts of almost $600,000 for timing differences and risk related to Pine Needle, MGC and FUEL • Favorable variance of approximately $145,000 in Member billings due to colder than normal weather • Overall favorable variance has been recorded as additional Net Assets

  5. 2010 G&A True-Up

  6. 2010 Financial Results Swing Supply Charge • Purpose • Implemented Oct 1, 2003 to pro-actively collect funds to maintain first-of-month (FOM) pricing for ALL Gas Supply to ALL Members • $2 MM collection is less than 1% of $265 MM in annual gas purchases • Goal • Minimize cost impact of swings through use of Member assets and Gas Authority purchased assets • Historic Results • Since inception, returned more than 60% of funds collected • FOM pricing maintained for ALL Members in light of increasing load and price volatility, and increasing pipeline limitations

  7. 2010 Financial Results Swing Supply Charge • 2010 Activity • SSC Collections$1,975,000 • Load Management Gains / Losses • Load / Price Volatility Gains $ 963,000 • Load / Price Volatility Losses ($ 450,000) • Storage / Option Costs ($ 420,000) • Net Gain $ 93,000 • Balance to Return to Members $2,068,000 • 2011 Expectation - $1,250,000 • First quarter losses of approximately $500,000 • Costs in Jan / Feb from incremental needs at higher prices • Costs in Feb / Mar from sales at lower prices

  8. 2010 Financial Results Capacity Management Credits • Production Area Supply Savings (PASS Credits) • Use of upstream capacity to purchase monthly gas when pricing is significantly below FOM (Monthly credit on bill) • 2011 Challenges • Very limited production area savings expected on TR and TETCO • Historically constrained supply sold to us at a discount is now flowing to other pipelines which will result in less savings

  9. 2010 Financial Results Capacity Management Credits • Capacity Release • Release of excess capacity to 3rd parties and internally • Monthly credit to reduce capacity costs • 2011 Challenges • Transco – Reduced value for capacity • Southern - Reduced capacity available and lower value

  10. 2010 Financial Results Storage Programs • Background: • Southern Storage (CSS) assets were acquired and financed in 1994 with Storage Revenue Bonds • All debt and deferred balances were fully paid in 2009 • Initial returns to Members began in 2009 • Transco ESS storage assets were transitioned to active price management in early 2009

  11. 2010 Financial Results Storage Programs • Current Operations: • Storage assets are critical to managing load swings during peak periods • Spreads between summer and winter gas prices are used to pay operating and working capital costs • Remaining margins are available for Member returns • Summary of Results • Annual net operating income has been strong and reliable as spread trades have been an effective hedging strategy for several years • Current storage year (2011-12) is partially hedged (40%) • Next storage year (2012-13) is 20% hedged • Future years are not yet hedged • Propose Member returns of $1.73 million (CSS) and $138,000 (ESS)

  12. CSS Storage 2009-10 Actual 2010-11 Estimated 2011-12 Projected 2012-13 Projected 2013-14 Projected Total $/Dt** Total $/Dt*** Total $/Dt*** Total $/Dt*** Total $/Dt*** $ Operating Margin $ 3,757,999 $ 1.25 $ 3,025,000 $ 0.96 1,700,000 $ 0.54 1,350,000 $ 0.43 $ 1,150,000 $ 0.36 $ $ Non-Operating Expense* $ 220,789 $ 0.07 $ 297,000 $ 0.09 $ 350,000 $ 0.11 $ 350,000 $ 0.11 350,000 $ 0.11 Net Income $ 3,537,210 $ 1.18 $ 2,728,000 $ 0.87 $ 1,350,000 $ 0.43 $ 1,000,000 $ 0.32 $ 800,000 $ 0.25 Member Returns $ 1,650,000 $ 0.55 $ 1,737,000 $ 0.55 $ 1,737,000 $ 0.55 $ 1,737,000 $ 0.55 $ 1,737,000 $ 0.55 Project Balance $ 1,887,210 $ 2,878,210 $ 2,491,210 $ 1,754,210 $ 817,210 Storage Withdrawals (Dt) 2,900,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 % Hedged 100% 40% 20% 0% • * Primarily internal interest expense charged project on working capital • ** $/Dt based on maximum storage quantities of 3,013,804 Dt • *** Addition of Dublin increased maximum storage quantities to 3,158,371 Dt starting 2010-11 2010 Financial Results

  13. ESS Storage 2009-10 Actual 2010-11 Estimated 2011-12 Projected 2012-13 Projected 2013-14 Projected Total $/Dt** Total $/Dt** Total $/Dt** Total $/Dt** Total $/Dt** $ $ $ Operating Margin $ 412,000 $ 1.65 205,000 $ 0.82 125,000 $ 0.50 86,000 $ 0.34 $ 85,000 $ 0.34 Non-Operating Expense* $ 35,000 $ 0.14 $ 20,000 $ 0.10 28,000 $ 0.11 $ 28,000 $ 0.11 $ 28,000 $ 0.11 $ Net Income $ 377,000 $ 1.51 $ 185,000 $ 0.72 $ 97,000 $ 0.39 $ 58,000 $ 0.23 $ 57,000 $ 0.23 Member Returns $ 138,000 $ 0.55 $ 138,000 $ 0.55 $ 138,000 $ 0.55 $ 138,000 $ 0.55 $ 138,000 $ 0.55 Project Balance $ 239,000 $ 286,000 $ 245,000 $ 165,000 $ 84,000 Storage Withdrawals (Dt) 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 % Hedged 100% 40% 0% 0% • * Primarily internal interest expense charged project on working capital • ** $/Dt based on maximum storage quantities of 250,442 Dt 2010 Financial Results

  14. 2010 Financial Results Long-Term Supply Projects • Gas Reserves • Gas Authority • Alabama and Kansas Coalbed Methane reserves • PGP - Portfolios of producing reserves • Pool 1 – MGAG 46% share • Pool 2 – MGAG 54% share • Pool 3 – MGAG 70% share • Prepayment transactions • TEAC and PEAK participation • Main Street transactions – JPMorgan, Merrill (2), and RBC

  15. 2010 Financial Results Long-Term Supply Projects – Gas Reserves • Reserve Diversity • Mix of conventional and unconventional reserves • Oil reserves are adding significant value • Geographic Diversity • 16 states – Greatest Value in Texas / Oklahoma • 5,500 + wells – Greatest number in Texas / Alabama • Solid Operating Partners • Mix of large / small private and large public companies • Generally using industry standard agreements • Operational exposure and risks • Hedged commodity prices for 5 – 6 years • Ongoing development opportunities

  16. 2010 Financial Results Long-Term Supply Projects – Gas Authority Reserves • Alabama CBM (Energen Operates) • Production at 12,000 Mcfe/day • Final year of 100 well drilling program (81 complete) • Kansas CBM (Dart Oil & Gas Operates) • Production at 8,400 Mcfe/day • Project economics have improved due to operating efficiencies • Dart is continuing to market their interest • Small oil play may be developing

  17. Transaction Locations # Wells Closed Price Sundown TX, AR, OK, NM, AL, MS, LA 2000 Jan. 2006 $268.9 MT, WY, CO, AL 308 Saga $61.0 Jan. 2008 $329.9 Saga Saga 2010 Financial Results – PGP Pool 1 Map Field/Sundown Cedar Cove McNic Cheyenne-Putnam/McNic II Cymreac Exploration Jetta/Permian HSA/Ward FGL/Future Potash Dome/Greka Tiger/Exco

  18. 2010 Financial Results Long-Term Supply Projects – Public Gas Partners • Pool 1 • Continuing to transition administrative services from largest operating partner (Sundown) to the Gas Authority • Net savings of $1.2 million per year • Better decision-making capabilities and visibility • Most planned development is focused on oil reserves in West Texas • Developed new database for managing operating decisions and additional accounting activity • Over $20 million in development expected for 2011 • Fixed assessments, which began in January 2011, will be used to accelerate debt repayment

  19. Transaction Locations # Wells Closed Price Apache Davis Four Corners Edna Hollow East Liberty Pine Hollow Kerr McGee Orion PetroNova Saga TGP TX, OK, LA TX KS/OK KS OK TX OK AL MT, WY, AL TX, MS, NM 170 5 30 20 82 8 4 6 200 40 June 2005 Dec. 2005 Oct. 2005 Nov. 2006 Apr. 2007 Nov. 2006 Oct. 2007 May 2007 Jan. 2008 June 2005 $ 67.0 7.5 1.8 3.9 7.1 20.0 3.3 3.0 19.0 5.7 $138.3 Apache TGP Davis – OK/KS Orion Davis – TX PetroNova Kerr-McGee Saga 2010 Financial Results - Pool 2 Map

  20. 2010 Financial Results Long-Term Supply Projects – Public Gas Partners • Pool 2 • Wide range of results among various projects / operators • Potential opportunities could provide significant upside • Texas Gas Partners – S. TX wells • Considering partial sale of partnership interests to capture value from high current oil prices • Continuing drilling of oil related reserves • Orion - Oklahoma tight sands project • Shallow oil play is developing in the area • Pool 2 has interests in 20,000 acres that may be productive • Recent core analysis had encouraging results

  21. 2010 Financial Results Long-Term Supply Projects – Public Gas Partners • Pool 2 • Challenges • Fixed assessments, which began in January 2011, will be used to accelerate debt repayment • Davis Oklahoma reserves • Prior operator sold out and transferred operations to the new owner in late 2010 without proper authorization • New owner has limited experience and financial resources – PGP has filed suit against new owner to take over operations • Alabama CBM assets • 10-well pilot program to establish a new field has been very disappointing and may need to be plugged and abandoned

  22. Total Possible Wells Purchase Price # PDP Wells Closed Transaction Location Description Orion-North Fork OK LA 0 20 180 300 May 2008 Sept 2008 $ 7.0 $11.0 $18.0 Hunton Dev Program CBM PDP + Dev Program CHC Energy Louisiana 2010 Financial Results – PGP Pool 3 Oklahoma

  23. 2010 Financial Results Long-Term Supply Projects – Public Gas Partners • Pool 3 • Two existing projects • Early-stage Louisiana CBM project • 20-well pilot program has continued to have operational issues • No additional activity while we wait for adjacent operator to complete new wells and share results • Oklahoma Dolomite de-watering project • Drilled 8 wells with existing partners in 2009 – 2010 • Currently drilling 6 additional wells • Existing partners did not participate due to lack of funding • Seismic information on one section indicates an unexpected shallow oil-producing formation that could be significant • New well has been authorized and will be drilled in May / June

  24. 2010 Financial Results Long-Term Supply Projects – Expected Results Key Assumptions • All key project reserve reports are updated annually by nationally recognized engineering firms • NYMEX pricing for 6 years and then $6.50 flat for gas and $80 flat for oil • Alabama CBM pricing is based on $5.00 long-term gas prices for conservatism • Interest rates averaging 3 – 4 %, based on current debt components and continuing blend of fixed and floating rates

  25. 2010 Financial Results Long-Term Supply Projects – Expected Results

  26. 2010 Financial Results Long-Term Supply Projects – Debt Management • Portfolio project obligations include • Direct debt and liquidity at the Gas Authority, and • Indirect debt owed by PGP • $307 million total debt, including proportionate share of PGP debt • Combination of long-term bonds, short-term notes and bank lines of credit • Combination of fixed and floating interest rates with approximately half in committed, fixed-rate obligations • Maintaining portion of debt in short-term, variable-rate structures is avoiding significant additional interest expense • $100 million at 3% higher fixed-rate bonds would cost an additional $3,000,000 in interest per year • Short-term rates have averaged less than 3.5% over last 10 years

  27. 2010 Financial Results Long-Term Supply Projects – Debt Management

  28. 2010 Financial Results Analysis of Individual Projects Within LT Supplies

  29. 2010 Financial Results Expected Long-Term Supply Project Results

  30. Corporate Goals and Incentive Compensation Plan • Based on Net Benefits to Members • Cost of Membership above Spot Index • General & Administrative Costs (G&A) • Swing Supply Charge • Less: Savings from Membership • Portfolio Savings and Current Year Reserves • Capacity Release Revenues and Swing Supply Returns • Storage Project Net Operating Revenues/Expenses • Drives Incentive Compensation Plan • Pays out only if Corporate Goal achieved • 80% based on Corporate results • 20% based on Group results • Multiplier between 0 and 1.1 for individual performance 2010 Corporate Goal

  31. Corporate Goals and Incentive Compensation Plan 2010 Corporate Goal

  32. Corporate Goals and Incentive Compensation Plan • 2010 Corporate Goal Results - ¢ Below Spot • Weighted Average Payout – 0%

  33. Proposed 2011 Corporate Goal Note: 2011 Averages $/MMBtu are based on 2011 budgeted volumes versus 2010 actual volumes to minimize the impact of weather related fluctuations

  34. Proposed 2011 Corporate Goal • 2010 and 2011 Corporate Goal Comparison

  35. Portfolio Supply Conasauga Shale Opportunity • Conasauga Shale • Shale in Eastern Alabama / Northwest Georgia • Dry gas - shale in excess of 9,000’ thick • Mitchell Resources • Small firm from Atlanta has leased mineral rights on 33,000 acres in Chattooga County, GA and Cherokee County, AL • Mitchell Resources says it has operator lined up and financial backing to build gathering system and drill 3-4 test wells • Learned from mistakes of 16 wells drilled in Alabama • Opportunity • Production to be physically connected to Summerville, Trion and LaFayette transmission system to feed all cities • MGAG to acquire 100% of production on behalf of all members at discount to market / avoid transport & fuel • Economic benefits with direct connect cities / portfolio

  36. Portfolio III Investments in Member Debt • Existing and proposed Member Debt in excess of the SPP threshold ($1 million) presents an opportunity for Portfolio III investment • PIII is authorized to invest in municipal debt obligations with at least an ‘A’ credit rating • PIII would benefit from investments through higher investment earnings on excess cash • Members would benefit through access to lower current interest rates

  37. Portfolio III Investments in Member Debt • Same legal structure as Small Projects Pool • Supplemental Contract • General Obligation of the Member • Rates established including small premium over market rates • Potential investments

  38. Shaping Our Future Today! Draft Strategic Plan 2016 • Gas Authority Mission - Unchanged To provide municipalities a reliable, economical supply of natural gas and to assist them in developing and growing their gas systems to optimize the benefits of public ownership • Outline • Introduction • Environmental Assessment • Strategic Issues • Goals & Strategies

  39. Shaping Our Future Today! Draft Strategic Plan 2016 • Results from “Vision 2011” • Two Corporate Goals • Improve Member margins by 15¢ per MMBtu • Achieved 17¢ per MMBtu • Grow annual throughput volumes by 7 Bcf to 77 Bcf • Averaged less than 61 Bcf • Member throughput +10% • Partner throughput -20%

  40. Shaping Our Future Today! Draft Strategic Plan 2016

  41. Shaping Our Future Today! Draft Strategic Plan 2016

  42. Shaping Our Future Today! Draft Strategic Plan 2016 • Environmental Assessment • Abundant, affordable supply of domestic natural gas for a long time • Financial Markets remain uncertain • Natural gas assumes increasing share of U.S. energy mix • Natural gas maintains price advantage over other fuels • Federal and state governments continue to influence gas business through policies and regulations • Strategic Issues • Greater Regulatory Burdens & Obstacles • Growing Retail Customers, Burner-Tips, Membership & Partners • Balancing Risks & Rewards • Competition from Alternate Fuels & Natural Gas Suppliers • Finding, Training & Retaining Quality Staff

  43. Shaping Our Future Today! Draft Strategic Plan 2016 Big 5 Shale Regions Projected to Grow Rapidly

  44. Shaping Our Future Today! Draft Strategic Plan 2016 • Goals & Strategies • Corporate Goals • Functional Goals & Strategies • Corporate Goals • Sustain Member Returns at More Than 3.5 Times G&A Costs • 3.5 times 2011 Budget G&A is $13.5 million in Member Returns • Grow Member Throughput by More Than 1.5% Per Year • Based on 2010 Member Throughput, 1.5% is 560,000 MMBtu • Grow Member Customers by More Than 500 Annually • Member Customers declined over 1,200 from 2009 to 2010

  45. Shaping Our Future Today! Draft Strategic Plan 2016 • Grow Member Throughput more than 1.5% per year (560,000 MMBtu) • Grow Member Customers more than 500 per year Corporate Goal $13.5 Million

More Related