1 / 43

Class 25: Even More Corrections and Survey Networks Project Planning

Class 25: Even More Corrections and Survey Networks Project Planning. 21 April 2008. Deadlines. Reading assignments (2) due 30 April 2008 Sample of what I expect is posted to class wiki page Extra credit due 23 April 2008 No lab assignments/homework will be accepted after today. Textbook.

wright
Télécharger la présentation

Class 25: Even More Corrections and Survey Networks Project Planning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Class 25: Even More Corrections and Survey Networks Project Planning 21 April 2008

  2. Deadlines • Reading assignments (2) due 30 April 2008 • Sample of what I expect is posted to class wiki page • Extra credit due 23 April 2008 • No lab assignments/homework will be accepted after today.

  3. Textbook • EM 1110-1-1003, Chapters 4-10 • Geodesy text, Chapter 11

  4. Does distance matter in GPS? Article available on NGS web site http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/CORS/Articles/

  5. Plumb line • Indicates the average direction of gravity between the point of suspension and the plumb bob. • It is perpendicular to every each level surface it intersects. • Equipotential surfaces are NOT parallel • Effected by mass of the earth • Oceans are a mass deficiency • Mountains a mass concentration

  6. Astro-Geodetic

  7. Deflection of the Vertical Angle between the plumb line and a normal to the ellipsoid is the deflection of the vertical. City of Corpus Christi, TX Ft. Davis, TX Denali, AK

  8. Computation of Deflection • Has a North South component ξ (xi) and East West component η(eta) • Computed with respect to astronomical azimuth (A) • ξ = θ cos A and η = θ sin A • Positive ξ indicates astronomic latitude will fall north of the geodetic latitude • Positiveη indicates astronomic longitude will fall east of geodetic longitude

  9. http://www.exploretheline.com/

  10. Mason-Dixon Line  = Φ - ξ

  11. Distance Corrections • Refraction – may be overcome by reciprocal vertical/zenith angles • Otherwise: k is coefficient of atmospheric refraction R is mean earth radius hA is ellipsoid height of instrument station

  12. Curvature Correction • Accounts for the fact that plumb lines are not parallel at different locations on earth’s surface.

  13. Geodetic Distance • Computed from level distance (LD) • LD * [ R / (R + h) ] • LD * [ R / (R + H + N) ] • Use R = 6,371,000 m • H = Orthometric Height • h = ellipsoid height • N = geoid height

  14. Planning GPS Control Surveys • Your plan will be developed in accordance with your client’s goals and the relevant standards. • EM 1110-1-1003 describes work for the USACE. • These differ from FGCS standards and specifications.

  15. Issues in Any Plan • Project Datum • Mostly will be NAD 83 (but which version?) • Intended accuracy • Horizontal, Vertical or both • Which height system (ellipsoidal or NAVD 88) • More accuracy = More $$$$ • Monumentation • Equipment needed (and available)

  16. Project Planning/Standards and Specifications • See class page for links to relevant documents.

  17. Meeting standards • We must have redundant observations in order to evaluate their precision. • We must have ties to fixed control (more than one) in order to attach our observations to this framework as well as to verify the relationship of the fixed points. • When our observations are more accurate than the fixed network, we degrade them to fit the network.

  18. Level Data Reduction and Adjustment 5

  19. Leveling summary

  20. Populating the design matrix • Height difference (i to j) is equal to the observed difference and its residual/variance. • Line 1. D – A = 1.978 + variance • Line 2. E – A = 0.732 + v • Line 3. D – C = 0.988 + v • Line 4. E – B = 0.420 + v • Line 5. D – E = 1.258 + v

  21. Design Matrix (Free) “From” station gets a “-1” “To” station gets a “1”

  22. Note diagonal elements!

  23. Observations/Distances

  24. Account for Known BMs • Review diagram • Solve for heights where direct connection to unknown 5

  25. Updated Matrices

  26. Rearrange to put BMs on right side • D = 11.999 + v • E = 10.753 + v • D = 11.990 + v • E = 10.741 + v • D – E = 1.258 + v

  27. Why not just mean heights? How do we account for the difference in elevation from E to D? How accurate is our result?

  28. Matlab Un-weighted Result Calculate residuals Calculate heights

  29. Weight Matrix • We assume that error will accumulate as a function of distance. • Weights assigned as 1/distKM.

  30. Weight Matrix • P used for weight matrix (also W) • Diagonal Matrix assumes no correlations • Applied to both design matrix and observation matrix • X = ATPA-1*ATPL

  31. D = 11.9976 E = 10.7445

  32. Differences in Results

More Related