1 / 24

Status of JetsMET

Status of JetsMET. PRS: Physics Reconstruction and Selection HCAL/JetsMET group. Shuichi Kunori U. of Maryland 18-May-2001. HCAL - Jets/MET. S.Eno / S.Kunori - Coordinator http://home.fnal.gov/~sceno/jpg/Default.htm Dates: End 2002 DAQ TDR (end 2001 for HLT section)

wylie-keith
Télécharger la présentation

Status of JetsMET

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status of JetsMET PRS: Physics Reconstruction and Selection HCAL/JetsMET group Shuichi Kunori U. of Maryland 18-May-2001

  2. HCAL - Jets/MET • S.Eno / S.Kunori - Coordinator • http://home.fnal.gov/~sceno/jpg/Default.htm • Dates: • End 2002 DAQ TDR (end 2001 for HLT section) • End 2004 Physics TDR • Organization: • HCAL simulation – Sunanda Banerjee (TIRF) • CMSIM/GEANT4/FAST • Verify shower model in G4. • Calibration & Monitoring – Olga Kodolova (MSU) • energy scale of jets, MET, tau • -> from detector construction/commission to in-situ calibration. • HCAL in ORCA – Salavat Abdoullin (Maryland) • readout simulation + … • Physics objects with HCAL – Sasha Niketenko (CERN/ITEP) • jets, MET & tau

  3. DAQ TDR (P.Sphicas, Nov.20, 2000) For both low and high luminosity We will cover all of these!

  4. Main Issues Many physics analyses require - low ET jets: from top, W, Higgs from WW fusion part of signal background rejection (e.g. jet veto) - High luminosity pile-up energy low ET jets from overlapping events fake jets due to pileup. - tjet - b jet (tag) - Correct energy scale from low ET to very high ET - Better resolution for Jet/MET ET range 20GeV-2TeV

  5. PT (lepton) h ET(b-quark)h <2.5 >20GeV 20-100 <2.5 0 200 -2 +2 0 200 -4 +4 MT (l+n) MET ET(tagging jet)h 2.5-4.0 >50GeV 50-100 >20GeV 0 200 -4 +4 0 200 0 200 Single Top - Kinematics 250pb Measurement of - Vtb / top decay properties / background to new physics

  6. Forward tagging jets &Higgs Couplings measurement Although s(VBF)~s(GF)/3, VBF process may play a big role in measurement of higgs properties in addition to discovery potential.

  7. t jet 1 tb tn 10-2 10-4 Branching ratios for H+ 1 tb 10-2 tn 1 prong t decay (t jet) 10-4 M(H+) 200 500 1000

  8. t jets • tau jet: • narrow (one prong) jet • L1/L2: • use only calorimeter • L1: 0.087x0.087 • L2: individual crystal

  9. tau jets at L3 1. Tracks are reconstructed with 3 pixel layers only within a cone given by L2.0 jet axis. 2. Isolation cuts: tracks in a big cone (0.3-0.4) vs. a small cone (~0,1), PT(tr)>1-2GeV gg->bbA(500GeV) (Nikitenko & Kotlinski : cms116 analysis)

  10. ET=3 GeV pion in 0<|h|<5 E=EC + a x H1 + H2 +HO e/g Et 100 GeV 3.0 GeV 1.0 Et 100 GeV p 0.9 1.5 GeV 0.8 3 h= 0 5 E= 3 7 30 82 227 GeV P= 0 200 400GeV Pion Response: Linearity ECAHL+HCAL: Non compensating calorimeter CMS Simulation 96’H2 Teast Beam Data

  11. Jet Response and Correction #1 (S.Arcelli) Et-eta dependent correction for QCD jets Et(corr)=a + b x ET(rec) + c x ET(rec)2 With pileup No pileup

  12. Dijet Mass Resolution With pileup No pileup W(jj) Top(jjj) Before correction M(bb) in ttH 15% 21% After correction Jet energy correction without: 19% with: 14% CMSJET 15% 16% 22% (S.Arcelli & V.Drollinger) (R.Kinunnen)

  13. MET Out of cone corr. uses weights for jet(30GeV) corr. Corrections Type 1: Jet corr. Type 2: Jet corr. + out of cone corr.

  14. Corrected MET for mSUGURA Jets+MET at low lumi s Mean offset

  15. Higgs mass in bbA, A2t2j (A.Nikitenko) before correction after correction

  16. Jet correction method #2 Optimized weights by #2 0.0<h<0.4 Jet Corr. #1 a x (EC+HC) - corr. for jet energy scale - a depends on jet(Et,h) Jet Corr. #2 a x EC + b x H1 + g x H2 - optimize jet resolution (and jet energy scale) - a, b, g depends on jet(Et,h) (A.Oulianov)

  17. Jet Correction method #2

  18. Correction method #3a(single pion) (V.Genchev) Method #1 Method #3 i : longitudinal segmenation Minimize with cmsim. resolution linearity 10% (EREC-EIN)/EIN 30% 5% (127+3)% 0% 20% 3% #3 (open) -5% 10% #1 (118+3)% -10% 0% 1 10 100 1000 (GeV) 1 10 100 1000 (GeV) Linearity is restored to 3% in 10-1000GeV for single pion!

  19. Correction Method #3b(single pion) (D.Green) 300 linearity reco 200 (e/h)HCAL~1.39(NIM paper) To find e/h for ECAL, measure e/pi at different energies for showers where there is a substantial energy (> 30% of the beam energy) in ECAL. (e/h)ECAL~1.60 100 beam 0 0 100 200 300 (GeV) resolution 20% s/E Linearity is restored to a few %. The resolution is Gaussian to a high level of accuracy with ~ NO constant term and a 120% stochastic coefficient 10% 5% 10 100 300 (GeV) Next: identify em cluster and had cluster in jet using transverse shower shape (in crystals) and reco-ed tracks and apply this to had cluster.

  20. 0.5GeV 1.0GeV Effect of Thresholdon low ET jet and MET Jets 35<ET(gen)<45geV MET (A.Krokhotine) (S.Nikitenko) Lower threshold is better! Electronics noise and occupancy define the threshold. >> aim at 0.5GeV/tower @ 10E34

  21. Front end electronics simulation (S.Abdoullin) Updated recently E = S (Signal buckets)i – S(pre buckets)j/n Electronics noise 200MeV/25nsec/ch  500MeV/(3+3) buckets/ch  Looking for better method for energy calculation

  22. Algorithm for L1 through Offline (1) • L1 – calorimeter only (coarse segmentation) • Resolution improvement • Equalize calorimeter response with simple correction • a x (EC+HC), a depends on jet(ET,h) • a x EC + b x HC, a,b depends on jet(ET,h) • Fake Jets/Pileup jets rejection • Threshold cut on a central tower in jets (seed cut) • L2 – calorimeter only (fine segmentation) • Resolution improvement • Better energy extraction from ADC counts • Em/had cluster separation using transverse shower shape in crystals • Fake jet/Pileup jet rejection • Use of transverse shower shape

  23. Algorithm for L1 through Offline (2) • L3 – calorimeter plus pixel • Resolution improvement • Pileup energy subtraction • Estimation of energy flow from pileup events using pixel hits/tracks. • Fake jets/Pileup jets rejection • Vertex information and jet pointing using pixel hits/tracks. • Offline – calorimeter plus fully reco-ed tracks • Resolution improvement • Fake jets/Pileup jets rejection •  Jet and MET will be reconstructed with Tracks, EM clusters and HAD clusters. •  All tracks down to ET~ 700MeV have to be reconstructed at 10E34! • Physics correction – e.g. correction for IFR/FSR. •  In-situ calibration!

  24. Long way to go, but promising…

More Related