1 / 11

Understanding Good vs. Bad Reflection Papers in Computer Science Courses

This guide outlines the key differences between effective and ineffective reflection papers in computer science courses. Good reflection papers connect course topics to personal experiences, employ a first-person, conversational tone, and are selective in their focus. They highlight “ah-ha!” moments and provide insights that enhance understanding. In contrast, bad reflection papers simply recite course material, lack personal engagement, are overly formal, and often contain grammatical errors. Recognizing these distinctions can improve student reflection and enhance course design.

wylie
Télécharger la présentation

Understanding Good vs. Bad Reflection Papers in Computer Science Courses

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Good vs. Bad Reflection Papers in COMP courses Todd A. Whittaker whittakt@franklin.edu

  2. Good Reflection Papers… • Connected topics both within and outside of the course material • Prior courses • Work experience • Modules in course

  3. Good Reflection Papers… • Were written in first person singular • Personal • Conversational • Reflective • Casual • Easy to read

  4. Good Reflection Papers… • Were selective in their topics • “Ah-ha!” moments • In the moment • One or two key ideas per week

  5. Good Reflection Papers… • Contained examples or quoted the key points or textbook • Interaction with material • Added insight to knowledge

  6. Good Reflection Papers… • Identified both good and bad parts about the course • Helps with course design • Identifies weak spots • Builds on strengths

  7. Bad Reflection Papers… • Were a recitation of the course material • “This week we learned…” • Tried to teach the teacher

  8. Bad Reflection Papers… • Were formally written • Third person or first person plural • Accompanied recitation of material

  9. Bad Reflection Papers… • Tried to cover too much • Seemed to want to convince the instructor that they learned something.

  10. Bad Reflection Papers… • Contained too many grammatical and spelling errors • I just stopped reading

  11. Bad Reflection Papers… • Were way too long • 3 to 5 pages was sufficient • Many were 10 or more

More Related