1 / 15

Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

Evaluation Session: Gateway Cities Education Agenda - English Language Learners Enrichment Academies. Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University. Evaluation Goals. Support Implementation Share successful strategies Identify and problem-solve challenges

xandra-riley
Télécharger la présentation

Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluation Session: Gateway Cities Education Agenda - English Language Learners Enrichment Academies Statewide ConveningOctober 16, 2014 Worcester State University

  2. Evaluation Goals • Support Implementation • Share successful strategies • Identify and problem-solve challenges • Improve Future Academies • Support Cross-Site Learning Network • Report on Implementation and Outcomes

  3. Evaluation Questions • Implementation: What program design and conditions need to be in place to ensure that the Summer Academies are implemented effectively? What conditions hinder implementation? • Student level impact: What is the impact of the Summer Academies on student outcomes? How and to what extent does impact on student outcomes differ across Summer Academy models? • Program partners (school, district, community) level impact: How and to what extent do the Summer Academies impact teachers, students, families? How will lessons and strategies be shared with schools and districts?

  4. Question 1: Data Collection • Implementation: What program design and conditions need to be in place to ensure that the Summer Academies are implemented effectively? What conditions hinder implementation? • How we collected data: • Reviewed 20 Grant Applications • Reviewed 8 2013 Interim Reports • Conducted 6 site-visits (mid-/late- July) • Observations, Focus Groups, Interviews, Collected Materials • Reviewing 20 Final Reports

  5. Question 1: Emerging Findings from Site Visits • Cross-Site Strengths: • High Expectations for ELLs • Caring teachers & staff • Safe environment for ELLs • Strong relationships with community partners • Culturally relevant recreational & enrichment activities

  6. Question 1: Emerging Findings from Site Visits cont. • Cross-Site Areas of Improvement: • Curriculum • Enrichment • Attendance • School-Year Practice • Community Partnerships

  7. Question 2: Data Collection • Student level impact: What is the impact of the Summer Academies on student outcomes? How and to what extent does impact on student outcomes differ across Summer Academy models? • How we collected data: • Data capture Excel file: • Site-Level Data • Student-Level Data • Summer enrollment & attendance • Summer Pre- and post-test data • SY 2014 & SY 2015 State Student-level Data • MCAS • ACCESS • SIMS • SSDR

  8. Question 2: Emerging Findings • Duration of 20 academies:

  9. Question 2: Emerging Findings Cont. • Students Served:

  10. Question 3: Data Collection • Program partners (school, district, community) level impact: How and to what extent do the Summer Academies impact teachers, students, families? How will lessons and strategies be shared with schools and districts? • How we collected data: • Site-Visit Data: • Teacher Focus Groups • Parent Focus Groups • Community Organization Focus Groups • Reviewing 20 Final Reports • Document Fall Convening Conversations

  11. Question 3: Emerging Findings fromSite Visits Eliminating Summer Learning Gap Teacher-Student Relationships Small Class Size

  12. Cross-Site Roundtable Discussions • Three topics: • Curriculum (Academic & Enrichment) • Family and Community Engagement • Impact of Academies on School Year Practice

  13. Roundtable Goals Reflect upon your academy using indicators from ELL Practice Framework Share your academy’s strengths and challenges with other sites Discuss future collaborations or partnerships Learn new strategies for 2015 academy Share lessons and strategies with your schools and/or district

  14. Roundtable Discussions • Group 1: Student Center, Foster Room (All Sessions) • Facilitator: Rosann Tung • Group 2: Student Center, Fallon Room (Sessions A&B) • Session C, 1:40pm: Sullivan Academic Center Room 209 • Facilitator: Ruth López • Group 3: Sullivan Academic Center Faculty Lounge Room 310 (All Sessions) • Facilitator: Lynne Sacks • 2:30pm-3pm Foster Room (ALL GROUPS)

  15. Questions? Comments?Contact:Principal Investigator: Rosann Tung, Ph.D. Rosann_Tung@brown.eduor Project Researcher: Ruth López, Ruth_Lopez@brown.edu

More Related