from regional innovation to science cities n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
From regional innovation to science cities PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
From regional innovation to science cities

From regional innovation to science cities

107 Views Download Presentation
Download Presentation

From regional innovation to science cities

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. From regional innovation to science cities David Charles and Felicity Wray

  2. Overview • The return of the concept of the science city • Limitations and critiques of regional innovation systems • The new focus on science policy at sub-national level • Science and city-regions • Characteristics of science cities • Case study of Newcastle • Policy issues

  3. The second coming of the science city? • Science parks • Technopoles, technopolises and science cities • Regional innovation systems and strategies • Regional science policies • Science cities

  4. Evolution of the notion of the science city • University cities as centres of learning only – Bologna, Oxford • The 19th century industrial city – Manchester, Newcastle • Innovation and the global metropolis – London, Berlin Paris, New York Tokyo • Planned science cities – Akademgorodok,Tskuba, Taedok, Hsinchu • Emergence of specialist science and innovation cities with universities at the core – Silicon Valley, Grenoble

  5. Limitations of regional innovation systems approach • Focus on system interactions – what does a region do if the only strengths are in science? • Regions with weak traditional industries and low levels of related variety • Strong cities with relatively weak regional hinterlands • Sectoral/cluster innovation systems not mapping onto regions • Limited focus on international links

  6. From regional innovation policy to regional science policy • Growing involvement of regional level bodies in science policy as an extension of regional innovation policy • Implications for regional investment of the Lisbon agenda, ERA and especially the Barcelona target of 3% GERD in GDP • Concern about the conflicts and tensions between different scales of policymaking • Notion of the agora as a site of debate on the purpose and meaning of science and the validity of ‘regional’ objectives for science • Contextualisation of science

  7. Shift to a multi-scalar science policy • Four key elements • New paradigms of regional development • Growth of devolution movements in a number of EU countries • Rise of international collaboration, notably in the EU Framework Programme • New disruptive technologies and mode 2 knowledge production

  8. Investments in universities and science infrastructures • Chasing global rankings • Cities/regions and universities in mutual investments • Universities as key assets • Florida arguments on talent attraction • Rethinking the university in the context of globalisation, commercialisation pressures and the triple helix rhetoric • Need for new governance relations to deal with new spaces for university engagement

  9. So what is a science city?

  10. Is a science city likely to be like this?

  11. Or like this?

  12. Science cities as hubs of the global knowledge economy • Economic development policy focused on hub cities • Alternatives to global cities as finance capitals • Sources of new industries and knowledge • Government enthusiasm for new knowledge- based clusters • R&D centres as poles of development but national policy tendency to centralisation • Science parks and technopoles as tools of regional and national development • Competition for investment but also talent

  13. Elements in the science city • Universities and public research – quality, research intensity, international in focus • Basic research focus of business – home grown or international • Innovative culture in local industry clusters • Spin offs from HE • Support services and infrastructures – venture capital and advice • Knowledge exploitation culture

  14. Spaces of engagement • Need to rethink the physical design of universities to reflect new roles and modes of knowledge transfer • Existing land and property portfolios and the need to manage them effectively • Centrality or dominance of universities in some cities • Reshaping the university as a place of shared knowledge production and encouragement of wider participation • Examples of strategic development to reposition universities in international networks and also to underpin international competitiveness • New forms of campus and knowledge precincts etc

  15. An international trend • UK science cities – Newcastle, Manchester, York, Birmingham, Bristol, Nottingham • Zurich, Leuven, Ulm, Dortmund, Heraklion? • Asian cases – Singapore, Cyberjaya, Taedok, Shanghai, Bangalore • Australia – Brisbane, Melbourne

  16. Singapore Biopolis

  17. Brisbane – Smart State to Smart City • Evolution of Smart State strategy • State investment in science infrastructure and translation spaces • Parallel developments of other innovation system components • Strong international dimension • Main concentration of investment in Brisbane • Recent recognition of the importance of precincts and spaces for engagement

  18. QUT Kelvin Grove CBD QUT Southbank Griffith U UQ Boggo Road precinct

  19. UK Science City programme • Announcement by government with no funding • Building on policies to encourage university engagement with business and 10 year plan for science • Six science cities in two announcements • Deliberately excluded London and golden triangle • No relocation of R&D on the agenda • Cities to develop own strategies based on universities through regional development agencies • Varied approaches across the six cities

  20. Newcastle Science City - Spaces for Science and Business Science Central

  21. Strategy for success c. 2007

  22. What might Newcastle Science City look like? • A place where: the university is open to business and economic development • Spinning out high tech/knowledge intensive companies • Bringing in high tech companies • Working with industrial and government partners • Active social entrepreneurship

  23. Elements • 4 science themes – mix of old and new • Translation research and exploitation • Campus redevelopment and expansion • Major physical redevelopment • Science education and widening aspirations • Public debate and understanding • Balancing interests of three main partners and building new governance structures

  24. Business School contributions • Business students and graduates – general and specialised • Student project work with Science City partners and firms • Specialised training within university and for business • Research on innovation and technology futures • Policy advice and support • Support for commercialisation strategies and enterprise programmes • Professors of practice

  25. Prospects for UK science cities? • Does it make sense to have 6 in addition to the golden triangle? • Is it possible to achieve anything without massive new resources? • Is it about regeneration, university strategy or regional economic development? • What’s the potential benefit – high tech? new services? a tool to rethink wider regional support? • Is it the last best hope?

  26. Tentative Policy Recommendations • No more rounds of UK Science Cities • Less emulation of successful places, • Less preoccupation with being ‘world class’, • Less emphasis on cultivating or even creating sexy sectors And instead …

  27. Policy Recommendations contin… • More refinement and subtlety in the strategies. Focus on local context and acknowledge history. • More strategic integration of the various forms of innovation, more achievable goals. • More outward facing – how engage with other territories engaged in similar activities AND harness value. • More funding from central government. • Continue to devolve decision making and autonomy to sub-national agents to make and shape their local development trajectories.