1 / 18

Enhancing University Rankings: Exploring Vision’s Proposal for Improvement

Delve into the merits and limitations of university rankings, and the vision for enhancing rankings from 2009 to 2011. Explore areas for improvement and next steps based on Vision's methodology, with a focus on transparency, innovation, and relevance.

xenia
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing University Rankings: Exploring Vision’s Proposal for Improvement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Universities within the Innovation Global Market: Rankings importance and limits and Vision proposal 10, October 2011 IREG CONFERENCE - BRATISLAVA

  2. The presentationisanabstractof the articleIdentify Areas of Improvements in the Universities Ranking and the Vision rankings (2009, 2010, 2011) available at www.visionwebsite.eu

  3. Agenda • Rankings’ merits and limits • Vision’sproposal • Results • Next steps

  4. Merits CLIENT CHOICES SUPPLY STRATEGIES EMPLOYEES POLICY MAKERS STUDENTS AND FAMILIES VISIBILITY RESEARCHERS UNIVERSITIES FUNDERS

  5. Rankings Map Source: Vision

  6. Limits METHODOLOGY LIMITS UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES • Transparency and comparability • Innovation • Size and scientific production biases • Competition • Self assessment and little attention to clients’ choice • Relevance

  7. Dynamism and Country Bias Source: Vision processing of Rankings’ websites information

  8. The problem How to save rankings’ merits – visibility – and improve rankings’ flexibility and relevance? Open data, returns, clients with a per product and per segment approach

  9. Vision methodology MORE RANKINGS UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES • Absolute value • International students • Students coming from other regions • Students with full mark • Placement • Students satisfaction • Private funding for research • Citations on Google-Scholar • Media Coverage • Normalized by size • Dynamic

  10. Internationalization and quality Overall score, Vision rankings (2011, 2010) Source: Vision on MIUR, CNSVU, Google, Italian Dailies, ISTAT * Withoutindicators on internationalstudents

  11. Vision - Internationalization ranking (2011) • International Students • International faculty • FTE exchangestudentsoutgoing plus FTE exchangestudentsincoming • FTE exchangefacultyoutgoing plus FTE exchangefacultyincoming • BRIC +5 students • BRIC + 5 faculty • Cultural diversity • Satisfaction • Growthrates IS • Growthrates IF

  12. Vision (2011) – The ranking

  13. International students on total (2010) Fonte: Dati MIUR, elaborazione Vision

  14. International studentsBRIC+ EU 5 on total (2010) Fonte: elaborazione Vision sudati CNVSU e MIUR

  15. Exchangefacultyoutgoingaspercentageof total (2010) Fonte: elaborazione Vision su dati LLP ed ERASMUS

  16. Limits METHODOLOGY LIMITS UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES • Transparency and comparability • Innovation • Size and scientific production biases • Competition • Self assessment and little attention to clients’ choice • Relevance

  17. Next steps • RETURN • GROWTH RATES • PER SEGMENT • PER PRODUCT • COMPETITORS • OTHER COUNTRIES

  18. www.visionwebsite.eu

More Related