360 likes | 466 Vues
This project explores the use of videotaping in teaching communication skills to 4th-year medical students at the Family Medicine Division. The study aims to document students' evaluations and experiences regarding videotaped consultations with real patients. Findings indicate high student engagement and valuable self-assessment opportunities through reviewing their performances. The results highlight the benefits of experiential learning and constructive feedback in improving communication competencies essential for effective patient care. Recommendations for enhancing the use of this teaching method are also discussed.
E N D
Videotaping medical student consultationsa teaching and learning technique for communication and behaviour change counselling skills Graham BresickSadickSaban4th yr Family MedicinePHFM Health Sciences Faculty
Outline • Introduction / background • Aims / objectives • What we do (method) • What students say (results) • Conclusion / discussion / recommendations
……….the factors influencing health actions are mainly social and psychological rather than physiological, anatomical and biochemical. Zola K. Pathways to the doctor - from person to patient. Soc Sci Med. 1973:7:677
Communication in the health care contextthe doctor-patient relationship • Biopsychosocial approach • Growing need for effective communication • evidence for patient-centred consultations • shift in the burden of disease to preventable, lifestyle diseases • Effective communication - essential competency
Medical education teaching communication skills • Teaching & assessing communication skills • Growing body of evidence for videotaping • reviewing videotaped consultations improves outcomes • allows students to observe themselves applying their skills • enhances experiential learning • student self-assessment possible • tutor feedback more objective and meaningful • Easy access to videotaping equipment • Use not widespread
Videotaping in the Division of Family Medicine • Videotaping for many years (4th & 6th yrs; PGs) • Use remains limited as a teaching tool • Not used in formal assessment • Students’ evaluation not reported to date
AIMS / OBJECTIVES • To describe the use of videotaping in the teaching and learning communication skills • To document students’ evaluation of the use of the videotaping and review session
STUDY SITE: Green Point Community Health Centre- Easily accessible from UCT medical school, space available.
Participants • Students (Interviewers) • 4th yr Medical Students completing Family Medicine block • Prior learning in in Communication Skills (BCC) • All 172 students attended the videotaping session • Friday mornings at Green Point CHC during 2011 • Patients (Interviewees) • Outpatients attending the CHC on Fri am • Chronic medical condition (E.g. Diabetes, Hypertension, Asthma) • Gave informed consent to participate in the session • Not debilitated, could climb the stairs to interviewing rooms • Facilitators • 2 medical doctors teaching communication skills
Each student conducts interview with a different patient Video clip
RESULTS and DATA ANALYSES(What the students say) • 138/172 evaluation sheets completed (80.23%) • All students said: first video interview • All students completed the entire interview • Student refusals = 0 • Data captured and analysed in Excel • Quantitative: Frequency Distributions – Bar Graphs • Qualitative: Most common themes extracted
Mention 2 or 3 things you found helpful 5 most common themes: • Reviewing my interview to identify bad habits – 123 (89.1%) • Critique from students and colleagues - 123 (89.1%) • Preparatory tutorial before the interview - 22 (15.9) • Interviewing REAL patients - 21 (15.2%) • Watching other students’ interviews - 4 (3.0%)
Mention 2 or 3 things you found unhelpful 5 most common themes: • “Nothing” - 37 (26.8%) • Patient feedback - 8 (5.8%) • Prep tutorial can be done previously - 5 (3.6%) • Difficult to do > 1 item in interview – 4 (2.9%) • Language barrier with patient - 4 (2.9%)
What would you change? 5 most common themes • “Nothing” – 20 (14.5%) • Receive cassette, review in own time – 13 (9.4%) • Have more of these sessions, helpful – 7 (5.1%) • Have more tutors - 5 (3.6%) • Have more time to interview – 4 (3.0%)
Discussion • Conclusion: what do the findings mean? • Discussion & Recommendations