130 likes | 262 Vues
This study evaluates inter-rater reliability of interviewing skills among healthcare professionals using a vignette method. The results indicate fair-to-good reliability on sub-items and good reliability on major items. Average ratings for various skills were analyzed, including rapport development, appropriate responses, data collection for differential diagnosis, and mental status examination. Key findings suggest areas for improvement, particularly in obtaining sufficient data for accurate diagnoses and conducting thorough patient interviews.
E N D
Vignette 1 Results Overview • Inter-rater reliability on the sub-items was fair-good • Inter-rater reliability on the major items was good
Vignette 1 Results Complexity of patient
Vignette 1 Results Difficulty of interview
Vignette 1 Results 1-1. Develops rapport with patient Average Rating 3.41 + 1.23 Consensus Score 3-4 Acceptable Range 2-5
Vignette 1 Results 1-2. Responds appropriately to patient Average Rating 3.52 + 0.96 Consensus Score 3 Acceptable Range 3-4
Vignette 1 Results 1-3. Follows cues presented by patient Average Rating 3.21 + 1.14 Consensus Score 3 Acceptable Range 2-4
Vignette 1 Results 2-1. Obtains sufficient data for DSM Axes I-V differential diagnosis Average Rating 2.94 + 1.15 Consensus Score 2 Acceptable Range 2-4
Vignette 1 Results 2-2. Obtains psychiatric, medical, substance use, family, and social histories Average Rating 3.07 + 1.21 Consensus Score 2-3 Acceptable Range 2-4
Vignette 1 Results 2-3. Screens for suicidality, homicidality, high risk behavior, and trauma Average Rating 3.37 + 1.15 Consensus Score 3 Acceptable Range 2-5
Vignette 1 Results 2-4. Uses open- and closed-ended questions Average Rating 3.61 + 1.35 Consensus Score 4-5 Acceptable Range 2-5
Vignette 1 Results 2-5. Performs an adequate mental status examination Average Rating 2.35 + 1.13 Consensus Score 2 Acceptable Range 1-3
Vignette 1 Results 1. Physician Patient Relationship Average Rating 3.15 + 1.04 Consensus Score 3 Acceptable Range 2-4
Vignette 1 Results 2. Conduct of the Interview Average Rating 2.78 + 0.94 Consensus Score 2 Acceptable Range 2-4