1 / 15

Assessing Predictions of CME Time-of-Arrival and 1 AU Speed to Observations

Assessing Predictions of CME Time-of-Arrival and 1 AU Speed to Observations. Angelos Vourlidas. STEREO Integrates Closely Remote & In-Situ Observations. Lynch et al 2010. P. φ. H-M. Many Methods for Measuring CMEs in 3D!. Direct Reconstruction

yaholo
Télécharger la présentation

Assessing Predictions of CME Time-of-Arrival and 1 AU Speed to Observations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Assessing Predictions of CME Time-of-Arrival and 1 AU Speed to Observations Angelos Vourlidas Vourlidas- SHINE 2012

  2. STEREO Integrates Closely Remote & In-Situ Observations Lynch et al 2010 Vourlidas- SHINE 2012

  3. P φ H-M Many Methods for Measuring CMEs in 3D! • Direct Reconstruction • Forward Modeling (Thernisien et al, Wood et al) • Geometric techniques • Triangulation • Using images (H-t) • Using J-maps (ε- t) (Liu et al 10) • Using masses (Colaninno & Vourlidas 09) • Using polarization (de Koning et al 09) • Point-P (Kahler & Webb ‘07) • Fixed-φ(Sheeley et al. ‚99) • Harmonic Mean (Lugaz et al `09) • Self-similar expansion (Möstl & Davies, 2012) Vourlidas- SHINE 2012

  4. Kinematic Model of the Apr. 26 CME Slide courtesy of B. Wood NOTE: This is a kinematic model for the leading edge of the flux rope component, not the front ahead of it. Vourlidas- SHINE 2012

  5. Speed/ToA depends on fitting method Colaninno thesis (ArXiv)Colaninno & Vourlidas (in prep) • black plus signs - front height from GCS model. • gray bars - estimated measurement error. (COR1 = 1, COR2 = 2, HI1=5, HI2 = 10 Rs). • dotted vertical line - arrival time of CME in situ. • green line - smooth spline fit with linear extrapolation to 1AU using the mean velocity of the last 2 hours of spline fit • green dashed line - spline speed • blue line – 2nd order fit ; dashed line – 2nd order speed • red line – 1st order fit ; dashed line – 1st order speed Vourlidas- SHINE 2012

  6. More examples Vourlidas- SHINE 2012

  7. Vourlidas- SHINE 2012

  8. Comparison of ToA & Speed Predictions to Observations Vourlidas- SHINE 2012

  9. Current state of arrival predictions from Lugaz et al (2010) and Liu et al (2010a,b) From Colaninno PhD Thesis Current Earth-impact accuracy: 6.7 hours Vourlidas- SHINE 2012

  10. Open Issues • Fitting method/function for Height-time curves? • Geometry of CME front and LOS? • Interaction with ambient solar wind. • Rotations, deflections, etc. ToA Error due to Projection Sky plane CME at Earth in projection HI-2 Vourlidas- SHINE 2012

  11. Comparing Imaging to in-situ:ICME Rotations and Deflections Isavnin et al (2012) • In-situ • Imaging CME rotate CW in the inner heliosphere CME deflect towards equator in the inner heliosphere

  12. Imaging CIRs with HI2: The 2008 January 31 CI Study the Evolution of CIRs in 3D Wood et al 2011 HI2-B HI2-A 3D CIR model Synthetic HI2-B image Synthetic HI2-A image Vourlidas- SHINE 2012

  13. Building a 3-D CIR Wood et al 2011 The following equations define the shape of a 2-D CIR shape in cylindrical coordinates in 3-D space, where ψ[0,2π] and η[-1,1]. A 3-D density distribution is then derived by assuming a Gaussian density profile normal to the 2-D CIR shape, such that if (r,,z) is the distance of a point from the CIR midplane, then For our morphological purposes, we simply set nmax=1. For the 2008 January 31 CIR, our best fit has the following parameters: This CIR maps back to a bifurcated streamer near the Sun, which surrounds a coronal hole.  = 0.802 AU/rad C = 6.091 rad  = 0.7  = 1.48 rad n = 0.0098 AU Vourlidas- SHINE 2012

  14. Visibility of CIRs Sheeley and Rouillard (2010) t1 t1 t2 A t2 B CIRs are best seen from region t2, which from Ahead is further away than from Behind Vourlidas- SHINE 2012

  15. Using SECCHI/HI to predict CIR arrival Davis et al 2012 • ACE: Peak= 10 cm-3, FWHM +31h • SECCHI: Peak= 9.5 cm-3, FWHM +58h BUT • ACE gives warning of 20-60 min. • SECCHI gives warning of (at least) 24h. HI imaging is a better tool than in-situ: • Sees streams several days before Earth arrival. • Situated outside Sun-Earth line (optimal angle > 40 deg). • Reconstruct 3Dproperties and origin. Hence, an L5 mission is the best platform for CIR SWx and Research. Geomagnetic response vs CIR arrival predicted from SECCHI/HI observations. Vourlidas- SHINE 2012

More Related