1 / 17

Experimental validation of a fast non-iterative imaging algorithm for eddy current tomography

Experimental validation of a fast non-iterative imaging algorithm for eddy current tomography Flavio Calvano 1 , Guglielmo Rubinacci 1 , Antonello Tamburrino 2 and Salvatore Ventre 2 1 Ass. EURATOM/ENEA/CREATE, DIEL, Università di Napoli Federico II, Italy

yamka
Télécharger la présentation

Experimental validation of a fast non-iterative imaging algorithm for eddy current tomography

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Experimental validation of a fast non-iterative imaging algorithm for eddy current tomography Flavio Calvano1, Guglielmo Rubinacci1, Antonello Tamburrino2 and Salvatore Ventre2 1 Ass. EURATOM/ENEA/CREATE, DIEL, Università di Napoli Federico II, Italy 2Ass. EURATOM/ENEA/CREATE, DAEIMI, Università di Cassino, Italy

  2. Eddy Current Tomography Anomaly Probe Conducting specimen

  3. Problem Definition Impedance Analyzer (auto and mutual impedances) Personal Computer (imaging algorithm) PC Impedance ( Inversion Analizer Algorithm ) ECT coils i2 iM i1 V c c V i>b Anomaly (=i) Conductor (=b)

  4. # l # k Phase 2 Vc Phase 1 V Eddy Current Data

  5. Key quantity for the inversion method Low frequency expansions Matrix of the mutual impedances between coils

  6. Phase 2 Vc Vc Phase 1 Phase 1 D D Phase 2 Monotonicity A. Tamburrino and G. Rubinacci, “Fast Methods for Quantitative Eddy-Current Tomography of Conductive Materials”, IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 2017-2028, 2006.

  7. Phase 1 Phase 1 Phase 2 Vc Vc Phase 2 V k Inversion: underlying idea

  8. Inversion: underlying idea Basic inversion algorithm: Take as estimate of V the union of those k such that V

  9.  The test for k is no longer valid ! The Noise

  10. At each kwe associate The Sign Index is the j-th eigenvalue of

  11. Experimental setup Benckmark: printed circuit board External Coil Internal diameter=5mm, external diameter=10.5mm, height=6.5mm, number of turns=700. Internal Coil internal diameter=1mm, external diameter=4mm, height=3mm, number of turns=180. The excitation frequency is 20kHz

  12. Results ReconstructedMap Region under test measurements Test domain measurements

  13. Results ReconstructedMap

  14. Results Top view Bottom view (scanned from the top view) Top Bottom Estimated Noise level : 50 mW Reconstructed Map with the bottom test domains ReconstructedMap with top test domains

  15. Results Top view Bottom view (scanned from the top view) Reconstructed Map with top test domains Reconstructed Map with the bottom test domains

  16. CONCLUSIONS • A fast inversion method for inverting eddy-current testing data has been applied to the identification of the shape of inclusions in a conductor by eddy current tomography. • The eddy-current data consists of the variation of the impedance matrix using an a-priori designed with numerical simulation array of coils to scan the specimen under test. • The second-order moment P(2) accounts for the resistive contribution to the changes of the impedance matrix occurring at relatively low frequencies. • A direct imaging algorithm based on monotonicity principle is available that allows real-time imaging on directly measured experimental data.

  17. REFERENCES • A. Tamburrino and G. Rubinacci, “A new non-iterative inversion method for electrical impedance tomography”, Inverse Problems, pp. 1809–1829, 2002. • A. Tamburrino and G. Rubinacci, “Fast Methods for Quantitative Eddy-Current Tomography of Conductive Materials”, IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 2017-2028, 2006. • A. Tamburrino, S. Ventre, G. Rubinacci, “Recent developments of a Monotonicity Imaging Method for Magnetic Induction Tomography” accepted for publication on Inverse Problems. • G. Rubinacci, A. Tamburrino, S. Ventre, “Eddy current imaging of surface breaking defects by using monotonicity based methods”, ACES Journal, vol.23, no. 1, pp. 46-52, 2008.

More Related