1 / 7

Craving a YumY u m ?

Craving a YumY u m ? . CS 598 KGK Fall 2013 Feng Shan, Kristen Vaccaro & Kirstin Phelps. Final Project Proposal . Motivation. Audience: small groups (3-8) looking for a restaurant dining recommendation.

yan
Télécharger la présentation

Craving a YumY u m ?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Craving a YumYum? CS 598 KGK Fall 2013 Feng Shan, Kristen Vaccaro & Kirstin Phelps Final Project Proposal

  2. Motivation Audience: small groups (3-8) looking for a restaurant dining recommendation. Create a web-based application to help groups solve one of the ‘hardest’ questions – where to eat? – by focusing on user cravings.

  3. Increased Abstraction Drag the dot to match your craving. Hot o Spicy Sweet Cold o

  4. Signals • Ambiguity • greater allowance for Butler Lies - elegant way to opt out of lunch • Mitigating signals • Focus on desire/craving versus brand/specific restaurant • De-emphasize impression given • Social capital (opportunity to try new things, become ‘expert’ and diminish elitism “I’d never go there”)

  5. Signal Costs • Ambiguity can: • cause hurt feelings if people opt out too often • decrease motivation to reach consensus • cause distrust of how system creates recommendation • Mitigating signals can: • decrease social capital of ‘foodies’ who gain status by recommending ‘the place’ people go • result in feelings of manipulation - users feel lack of control on own choice • decrease potential for showing alignment by negotiating a compromise

  6. Deliverable • Insight into user • Web interface • Working algorithm(figure out the weights) • Stats/Evaluations (how many ‘users’ take our suggestions? )

  7. Bits of Wisdom... • Please fill out our brief survey! • What are we overlooking? • What are important aspects of profile (outside of allergies, diet restrictions, pregnant (y/n)), that have impact on restaurant choices? • Suggestions on time & $ preferences? (15 min increments, $ - $$$$)

More Related