1 / 6

Proposed Actions of Data Technical Subcommittee for Feb. 2011 Meeting

Proposed Actions of Data Technical Subcommittee for Feb. 2011 Meeting. January 20, 2011. Proposed Work. Demonstrate distribution of primary care Compare to current HPSA Provide judgment and recommendation on relative merit of data sources existing/potential secondary sources

yaphet
Télécharger la présentation

Proposed Actions of Data Technical Subcommittee for Feb. 2011 Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Proposed Actions of Data Technical Subcommittee for Feb. 2011 Meeting January 20, 2011

  2. Proposed Work • Demonstrate distribution of primary care • Compare to current HPSA • Provide judgment and recommendation on relative merit of data sources • existing/potential secondary sources • Local/state collected • Consider ways to combine direct health & social deprivation approach to MUA

  3. Specific HPSA Analyses • Map/analyze primary care docs • GP, FP, IM (no subspec), Peds (no subspec) • Map/analyze non-doc primary care providers • NP, PA • Combine them • Show impact of adding these ‘hold’ groups • Doc Subspecialists: IM, Ped, OB/GYN >>>Overlay different definitions with HPSA<<<

  4. A Bit More Detail • Sensitivity Analyses for weights of non-doc • Sub-sub group will suggest weight • Best evidence, sensitivity? • Explore different cut points • Relative (ex. Quartile split) • Normative (literature driven answer) • Units of Geography to explore • County, PCSA, State-based service areas

  5. Toward an MUA • We will work on different approaches that join the direct measurement of health outcomes with a social deprivation-type approach • Attempt to provide some empirical information on what options look like compared to current IMU • Keep in mind notion of menu options

  6. Sub-Sub Groups • Workforce (Tess, Andrea, Ron, others) • Accessibility-distance, barriers (Alice, Alan, Barbara, Dan, Beth G., Sally, others) • Ability to pay (Tim, Bill, Jose or Roy) • Health Status/Socio-Economic Indicators (Bob, Steve, Alice, Marc, Don, Jose)

More Related