1 / 3

Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives

The Preliminary Design Review (PDR) for the instrument aims to facilitate a comprehensive assessment by the Review Panel. The review will evaluate compliance with applicable design requirements, the completeness of system-level planning, and the technical baseline, as well as readiness for detailed design. Success criteria include meeting Level 1-3 design requirements, resolving open issues, and having adequate integration, verification, validation, and safety plans consistent with NASA policies and risk management strategies.

yitro
Télécharger la présentation

Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives

  2. Review Objectives • This Instrument Preliminary Design Review (PDR) will allow the Review Panel to: • Assess the compliance of the design with applicable requirements. • Evaluate the completeness and consistency of the system level planning, technical baseline, supporting analysis and cost/schedule baselines developed during formulation. • Evaluate the project’s readiness to proceed with detailed design.

  3. PDR Success Criteria • The Instrument PDR success criteria are established as follows: • The proposed design meets the instrument level 1 through level 3 requirements and measurement requirements as defined in the Mission Requirements Documents. • The design meets interface requirements and constraints. • Plans to resolve open issues are complete and consistent with available resources and the risk policy of LRO. • There are appropriate margins at this stage of the design. • Integration, verification and validation approach and plans are adequate. • The mission assurance and safety plans and processes are consistent with mission risk and NASA policy. • The project has defined and implemented plans, processes, tools, and has in place the organization for managing and controlling the development and operation of the mission.

More Related