1 / 6

Chapter 7 -- Ranking Mutually Exclusive Investments

Chapter 7 -- Ranking Mutually Exclusive Investments. Reasons for mutually exclusive investments: Differences in the lives of projects Differences in the use of other scarce resources Floor space, Skilled personnel Management talent, Franchise . NPV Is Better Than IRR.

yitta
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 7 -- Ranking Mutually Exclusive Investments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 7 -- Ranking Mutually Exclusive Investments • Reasons for mutually exclusive investments: • Differences in the lives of projects • Differences in the use of other scarce resources • Floor space, Skilled personnel • Management talent, Franchise

  2. NPV Is Better Than IRR • Net present value measures the wealth created today from an investment today. This is the goal of management. • IRR does not account for the size of the project. • If money cost 10%, it is better to earn 12% on a million dollar project than 12% on a $1,000 project. • IRR ignores the length of time the money is invested. • Using the example above, it may be better to earn 12% for 5 years than 14% for one year.

  3. When to Use NPV Versus Equivalent Annuity for Projects With Unequal Lives • If you cannot reuse the constrained resource, then maximize NPV • very rare situation • industrial park location or a lease • If you can reuse the constrained resource, then maximize the equivalent annuity • most situations in reality

  4. Repair or Replace Decisions • In most situations a new asset will have a longer life than an existing asset, in these cases you must use the equivalent annuity method (if the asset can be replaced) • You should not net the salvage value of the old into the cost of the new, it alters the equivalent annuity -- they must be kept separate

  5. Optimal Abandonment Decisions • Do not ignore the salvage value in predicting cash flows • Salvage value typically decreases with age • When using the computer it is easier to start with the longest life first

  6. Optimal Abandonment Decisions • If abandonment frees up a constrained resource and replacement with a like resource is possible, then use the equivalent annuity method • If you cannot replace the constrained resource with a like resource, then maximize the net present value considering future salvage values

More Related