1 / 31

Session Objectives: Keith

University of Minnesota InternalExternal Sales “The Internal Sales Review Process” An Overview of What Happens During the Review. Session Objectives: Keith. Explain the process used for internal sales reviews Identify what can be done to improve the process.

yoland
Télécharger la présentation

Session Objectives: Keith

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. University of Minnesota Internal\External Sales “The Internal Sales Review Process”An Overview of What Happens During the Review

  2. Session Objectives: Keith • Explain the process used for internal sales reviews • Identify what can be done to improve the process

  3. About the Reviews Keith Scope includes: • Budget vs. Actuals vs. Rates • Previous completed fiscal year • Resource utilization • Break-even analysis • Margin analysis • Identify the risks and the controls over those risks

  4. “Which Internal Sales activities will be reviewed?” Keith • Objective is to focus our review work on the areas of greatest risk to mitigate that risk • Review all Internal Sales every 2 years • Review any Internal Sales identified with issues by Internal Audit • Review sales generated in Internal Sales account 500101 that do not have approval or meet requirements

  5. Reviews Process Objective Keith • Objective is to determine if the rate development methodology, accounting, and rate charging practices are compliant with OMB A-21 requirements, federal cost accounting standards, and University of Minnesota policy and procedures. • OMB Circular A-21 is the publication: Cost Principles of Educational Institutions from the Office of Management & Budget

  6. Prior to the Review Keith Request for information is sent to management in advance of expected review A request is made for review materials, including: • Rate development • Types of services and activity • Assigned Business Manager / point of contact • Transactional detail for selected vouchers • Volume basis • Fixed asset reconciliation/depreciation calculations • Account structure used for ISO and ESO activity

  7. Prior to the Review (continued) Keith • Materials to be returned in 10-14 days to Internal Sales • Electronic submission required • Information is used during review

  8. Prior to the Review (continued) Keith Meeting • Before the review work has started but after receiving the requested information • Typically the RRC Manager & main financial person • Provides a chance to discuss the general review process • Gives input to Internal Sales activities that will be reviewed

  9. Review ProcessKeith Information sources: • UMReports “Account Status for Current Non-Sponsored Funds Report” for budget, revenue and expenditures. • Fixed Asset report from Inventory Services • The request for information is sent to management with questions and information requested

  10. Review Process(continued) Keith • Activities reviewed: • Unallowable and allowable costs • Transfer codes  • Segregation of revenue and expenditures • Rate volumes • Depreciation • Operating Margin • Inclusion of all costs • Impact of External Sales • Budget vs. Actuals and Rate development • Customer base and rate type • Annual Requirements • Monthly Invoicing

  11. Review Process(continued) Keith • Request for Materials • Preparation of review checklist • Request meeting to go over open items and resolve questions • Draft compliance memo • CC draft to Business Manger and RRC Manager for feedback / questions • Issue final compliance memo • Follow up of Plan implementation

  12. ReviewsMary What to expect during the review? • Length of time – 2 weeks after information received • Transaction documentation • Follow-up questions • Communication of results • Define solution to identified findings

  13. Reviews(continued) Mary How do the results affect you?  • Awareness of policies / processes / best practices • Changes needed to enhance compliance or efficiencies • Update rate development • Adjustments to cover surplus & deficits

  14. What is in the Compliance Memo?Mary • Description of the unit and the activity • Summary of findings • Recommendations • Ratings of findings • Management action plan response requirement • Policy or procedure statement that defines requirement

  15. Compliance Issue Examples Keith • Expenses not included in rates or actuals • Not charging all internal customers the same rate • Depreciation rates not agreeing with Inventory Services, actuals or rate development • Unallowable expenses in rates

  16. Compliance Issue Examples Keith • Not segregating revenues and expenses for Internal and External Sales • Purchasing equipment directly to an Internal Sales account rather than an Internal Sales plant fund • Set up with incorrect fund and accounts • Not managing surpluses or deficits

  17. Review Findings Rating SystemMary • Refer to handout • ESSENTIAL • Resolution will help avoid a potentially critical negative impact: • Loss of material assets • Loss of reputation • Loss of critical financial information • Inability to comply with important laws, policies or procedures

  18. Review Findings Rating System (continued) Mary • SIGNIFICANT • Resolution will help avoid a potentially significant negative impact: • Loss of material assets • Loss of financial information • Inability to comply with important laws, policies or procedures

  19. Review Findings Rating System (continued) Mary • USEFUL • Resolution will help improve controls and avoid problems in the unit’s operations

  20. How is the Rating System Used? Mary • Significant or Essential findings: • require a Management Action Plan • No Significant or Essential findings: • the review is closed • Useful findings: • Do not require a MAP but should be implemented by department

  21. Who sees the Compliance Memo? Mary • Dean/Department Head/Director • Business Manager • RRC Manager • Budget Office • Controllers Office • Department of Audits • Internal/External Sales Manager

  22. Compliance Memo Response Jeff • Management Action Plan is due 1 month from the date of the final memo • ESSENTIAL findings must be corrected within three months of date of final memo • SIGNIFICANT findings must be corrected during next budget cycle • Surpluses greater than 15% must be paid back within three months of date of memo • Deficits that will not be included in future rates must be paid before fiscal year end

  23. Follow-up by the Reviewed Unit Jeff • Review report findings, recommendations, and management action plan • Retain documentation to support efforts towards implementation

  24. Follow-up by the Reviewed Unit (continued) Jeff • Communicate with Internal/External sales on ongoing progress • Self-assess progress toward expected implementation date • Explain obstacles preventing or delaying implementation

  25. Follow-up by Internal SalesJeff • Documentation to support status as reported • Review to confirm • Summary report and assessment of progress

  26. How to improve the review process Jeff Prompt responses • Requested Materials • Documentation • Requests for information • Requests for meetings

  27. How to improve the review process (continued) Jeff Communicate • Availability of key staff • Completion of requests • Concerns • Explanations • Issues

  28. How to improve the review process (continued) Jeff Take action • Implement agreed-upon management action plan • Do a review before the formal review and during the year • Communicate progress

  29. Tips on how to prepare / stay prepared for the next review Jeff • Adjust operations to ensure compliance • Update items that have been requested • Downsizing, restructuring, merging of functions can impact internal sales rates; review rates to ensure they are still proper • Use U-wide systems and processes in lieu of developing in-house processes • Monitor surpluses or deficits • Training for key personnel • Discuss any issues or concerns with Internal Sales

  30. Other Items Keith • Register for the “Internal Sales Seminar” on February 17th” • Brown Bag Seminar “External Sales Agreement” (Contracts) January 27th at 12:30. • Internal Sales Training Courses at our website • Procedure “ Reviewing Internal Sales Activity Annually”

  31. Questions? Resources: Office of Internal Sales website http://www.finsys.umn.edu/sales/iso.html • This presentation is posted on the site.

More Related