1 / 10

The Swedish Case - Process & Outcome

Explore the process and outcome of the Swedish case, where SABO and the Swedish Union of Tenants presented a joint proposal for new conditions for municipal housing companies. This historic compromise led to new laws that promote businesslike operations, profitability, and active social responsibility.

yvonnew
Télécharger la présentation

The Swedish Case - Process & Outcome

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Swedish Case - Process & Outcome Johanna Ode SABO, Sweden

  2. SABO - The Swedish Association of Municipal Housing companies • Industry and interest organisation • Founded 1950 in Gothenburg • 300 member companies • 729 000 dwellings • Every 7th inhabitant of Sweden

  3. Started in 2005 with a Complaint to the European Commission • Municipalities support for their housing companies • favorable guarantees etc. • SEK 12 447 million in 2002

  4. 2005 – 2008 Inquiry on the Conditions for Non-Profit Housing • Two alternative proposals: • strictly commercial with profit maximization • social housing with income limitation • Severely criticised by all stakeholders on the housing market Michaël Koch, Investigator

  5. April 2009: SABO and the Swedish Union of Tenants Presents a Joint Proposal • ” A historic compromise” Kurt Eliasson, SABO BarbroEngman, Union of Tenants

  6. November 2009: Press ConferenseGovernmental Memorandum Remitted Kurt Eliasson, SABO Mats Odell, Minister for Housing Barbro Engman, Union of Tenants Reinhold Lennebo, Private Property Federation

  7. March 2010: Government Bill to Parliament • New conditions for municipal housing companies • Same conditions as any private housing company • No advantage from the owners • Businesslike, profitability perspective • Active social responsibility • Note: Have never been SGI or income limit for tenants

  8. March 2010: Government Bill to Parliament • New rent setting • Rents set in collective negotiations at local level • Rents negotiated by any landlord (public or private) and a local tenants • association normative • Solved by partners • – not government • The utility value system and consumers views

  9. Swedish Case Solved by Summer 2010? • June 2010 – Decision on laws by Swedish Parliament • Complaint to the Commission is withdrawn? • President of the Swedish Private Property Federation in Sweden, in November 2009: • “It appears that this proposal will help to provide us with legislation that no longer violates EU competition law. Given this, we will be able to withdraw our EU complaint.” • 1st January 2011 – New laws come into force

  10. Thank you for your attention! • Johanna.Ode@sabo.se • Head of International Affairs, SABO

More Related