1 / 18

Overall

Overall. 3 charts w/ Science from 04 to 07 3 charts w/ Reading, Math, and Science during treatment years (05-07) 2 charts for 5 th Math and reading (06 & 07) to show those subjects have not suffered with increase science focus.

zagiri
Télécharger la présentation

Overall

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overall 3 charts w/ Science from 04 to 07 3 charts w/ Reading, Math, and Science during treatment years (05-07) 2 charts for 5th Math and reading (06 & 07) to show those subjects have not suffered with increase science focus

  2. WASL Science Scores – 5th GradeState vs. non-TL, NCOSP -TL% Proficient (2004 to 2007) NCOSP N= 869 885 1,023 1,043 Non-NCOSP N= 4,263 3,999 3,865 3,772

  3. WASL Science Scores – 8th GradeState vs. non-TL, NCOSP -TL% Proficient (2004 to 2007) NCOSP N= 1,685 1,437 1,363 1,598 Non-NCOSP N= 3,631 3,951 3,850 3,508

  4. WASL Science Scores – 10th GradeState vs. non-TL, NCOSP -TL% Proficient (2004 to 2007) NCOSP N= 908 965 1,315 1,356 Non-NCOSP N= 3,648 3,982 3,338 3,739

  5. 5th Grade WASL Scores (2005-2007)*By Subject% Proficiency *Math and Reading available for only 2006 & 2007

  6. 8th Grade WASL Scores (2005-2007)*By Subject% Proficiency *Math and Reading available for only 2006 & 2007

  7. 10th Grade WASL Scores (2005-2007)By Subject% Proficiency

  8. WASL Reading Scores – 5th GradeState vs. non-TL, NCOSP -TL% Proficient (2006 to 2007)

  9. WASL Math Scores – 5th GradeState vs. non-TL, NCOSP -TL% Proficient (2006 to 2007)

  10. Subgroups • 1 List of subgroups that are consistently and significantly higher w/ TLs • 1 chart w/ effect sizes for significant subgroups • 2 charts w/ proficiencies and scale scores for significant groups • NCOSP TLs represented as colored bars • Non-TLs represented as yellow bars

  11. Subgroups • Subgroups with significantly higher Sci. scale scores that have consistent (or near consistent) results across 5th, 8th, 10th • free-reduced lunch (5-8-10) • Hispanic ethnic group (5-8-10) • Special Education (5-8-10) • Level 1 and Level 2 for same year Math (5-10) • Level 1 and Level 2 on 8th grade sci. WASL (10 –only grade applicable) – not found on 5th to 8th grouping

  12. Subgroups Scoring Significantly Higher with NCOSP TLsEffect Sizes (Larger #s = greater separation between TLs and Non-TLs)

  13. Subgroup Effect Sizes (2005-2007)NCOSP TL vs. Non-TLs Percentile diff. = 5 10 6 7 9 6 6 4 0 0 5 7 7 4 3 10 7 5th Grade 8th Grade 10 Grade Based on scale score T-tests, TL vs. non-TL

  14. Subgroup % Proficient (2005-07)NCOSP TL vs. Non-TL =non-TL =NCOSP TL color 5th Grade 8th Grade 10th Grade

  15. Subgroup Scale Scores (2005-07) NCOSP TL vs. Non-TL =non-TL =NCOSP TL color 5th Grade 8th Grade 10th Grade

  16. Value-Added • 1 summary chart w/ 5th and 10th “value added” • 2 charts w/ Gains from ’05 8th Gr. to ’07 10th grade Sci. WASL • 1 summarized to 0-1-2 yrs. w/ NCOSP teacher • 1 broken into all the 8( )_10( ) categories

  17. Number of Years with a NCSOP Teacher Leader5th and 10th Grade Science WASL 8th and 10th 4th and 5th 8th or 10th 4th or 5th (2006 & 2007) (2007) 0 yrs. of NCOSP TL N= 7,408 2,949 1 yr. of NCOSP TL N= 1,927 1,819 2 yrs. of NCOSP TL N= 368 327

  18. Gain from 2005 8th Gr. to 2007 10th Grade Science Scale score points (diff. from mean)by Number of Yrs. With NCOSP Teacher N = 1,983 1,497 306 Mean gain score = -8.7 for 3,800 10th grade students in 2007 Significant difference between (0 and 1 groups) and (0 and 2 groups), One way ANOVA test

More Related