1 / 16

Indy JUG

Indy JUG. Authorizations with OASIS XACML. E-GINEERING, LLC. Dan Gradl. Agenda. Drivers Overview XACML Logical Architecture PEP in-depth XACML 2.0 Policy Model XACML Context Context vs PIP Implementations Enterprise challenges What’s new in XACML 3.0.

zed
Télécharger la présentation

Indy JUG

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Indy JUG Authorizations with OASIS XACML E-GINEERING, LLC Dan Gradl

  2. Agenda • Drivers • Overview • XACML Logical Architecture • PEP in-depth • XACML 2.0 Policy Model • XACML Context • Context vs PIP • Implementations • Enterprise challenges • What’s new in XACML 3.0 Authorizations with OASIS XACML

  3. Drivers from project experience • Many access control implementations (100+) in the organization • Access rules embedded within application – difficult to change • Difficult to audit and report across many disparate systems • Necessary to control access to coarse grain (e.g. services, views) and very fine grain (e.g. data elements) resources • Complex rule scenarios (Attribute Based Access Control) • Permission assignment to be user based and/or role based • Diverse platforms • Delegated administration Authorizations with OASIS XACML

  4. Overview • OASIS specification – eXtensible Access Control Markup Language • Defines a declarative Attribute Based Access Control model • Encourages separation of access control rules from applications for ease of maintenance, auditing, reporting • XACML 1.0- 2003 • XACML 2.0- 2005 • XACML 3.0- 2010 Authorizations with OASIS XACML

  5. XACML Logical Architecture Authorizations with OASIS XACML

  6. PEP • A Policy Enforcement Point will check an entitlement and react to (enforce) the decision • Therefore, how a policy is enforced varies based on the resource/resource realization being protected • Examples • If I don’t have access to view a page hide the navigation item • If I don’t have access to view a field hide the field • If I don’t have access to update a field, stop processing and display message • Even if the result is functionally the same, the details of gathering the request context and dealing with the result may vary • Different PEPs will be used to protect different resources Authorizations with OASIS XACML

  7. Example PEPs • Request interceptor • Servlet filter • JSF render/validation interception • AOP method interceptor • Tag library • COBOL module (in front of CICS transactions) Authorizations with OASIS XACML

  8. XACML Policy Data Model Authorizations with OASIS XACML

  9. XACML Context Authorizations with OASIS XACML

  10. XACML Request • One or more Subjects with zero or more Attributes • One or more Resources with zero or more Attributes • One Action with zero or more Attributes • One Environment with zero or more Attributes Authorizations with OASIS XACML

  11. XACML Response • One or more results – multiple if request is for multiple resources • Decision • Status • Obligations Authorizations with OASIS XACML

  12. Request Context vs PIP • As a PDP evaluates a policy it needs to process against a set of input data • The data has to come from either the Request Context or a PIP • There are tradeoffs to each • Request Context • May already have the information at hand • Some information may be runtime in nature (not persisted to some data store) • PEP and/or application may end up knowing too much detail about policies (what attributes are required) • Adding new attributes here typically requires application development • PIP • Potentially access any data in the org (even data that the application does not typically access) • May slow performance as data is requested (the application may have accessed it already) • Requires some integration work to connect to specific data stores • New data can potentially be used in policies without affecting all applications using those policies Authorizations with OASIS XACML

  13. Implementations • Open-source • SunXACML – inactive open source PDP implementation • JBossPicketBox – PDP implementation based on SunXACML • SICSAML XACML – XACML 3.0 PDP reference implementation based on SunXACML • enterprise-java-xacml – Google Code hosted PDP project (one developer) • UMU-XACML-Editor – simple policy file editor • Commercial • Securent –> Cisco Enterprise Policy Manager • IBM Tivoli Security Policy Manager (TSPM) • BEA/Oracle • Axiomatics – based on SICSAML Authorizations with OASIS XACML

  14. Challenges • What is access control and what is business rule • Enforcement • Impact to development model • Guaranteed enforcement • Obligation handling • Resource management • Hierarchical resource trees • Resource synchronization • Performance • Efficiency of PDP, including policy search/indexing • Policy efficiency – many ways to write the same rule, some less efficient • Caching • Administration • Variety of views – policy writing, constraint editing, assignment of permissions • Policy information points • Authentication and Integrity Authorizations with OASIS XACML

  15. XACML 3.0 – What’s New • Disjunctive/conjunctive target elements (AnyOf, AllOf) • More flexible/custom categories (beyond Subject, Resource, Action, Environment) • Advice – similar to an obligation but is optional • Obligations can use dynamic attributes • Delegated administration profile • Multiple decision profile • Enhanced policy combination algorithms • New data types and functions (Xpath) Authorizations with OASIS XACML

  16. Questions OASIS XACML

More Related