html5-img
1 / 13

University of Florida

University of Florida. Purchasing Services Budget Request March 12, 2013 Lisa Deal, Purchasing Director. Purchasing Services Mission. Acquire quality goods and services at competitive prices Identify opportunities for cost savings through strategic sourcing

zedekiah
Télécharger la présentation

University of Florida

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. University of Florida Purchasing Services Budget Request March 12, 2013 Lisa Deal, Purchasing Director

  2. Purchasing Services Mission • Acquire quality goods and services at competitive prices • Identify opportunities for cost savings through strategic sourcing • Create efficient purchasing systems and mechanisms for use by faculty and staff • Promote fair and open competition • Mitigate risk and ensure compliance • Execute agreements and contracts for the recurring needs of the University • Provide quality customer service, training and information related to University Directives and Procedures

  3. Services of Purchasing • Buying – requisitions/PO’s – contract review • Public Solicitations – ITB, RFP, ITN • Strategic Sourcing – Print Metrics • PCard • Supplier Management Conducting business reviews with contract vendors is key to realizing best value.

  4. Savings • FY 2010$2,973,062 • FY 2011$4,334,038 • FY 2012$3,111,826 Revenue: Contract Compliance        $ 34,000 PCard incentive $ 1,252,201 Contract Revenue           $ 228,221 1,514,422

  5. Why Purchasing is asking for $ An essential component in supporting the campus is missing from Purchasing • Currently there are no employees dedicated to contract management. • Without personnel dedicated to this effort Purchasing Services is unable to adequately monitor existing contracts for vendor compliance. • Nor can campus effectively identify which contracts to use, so they go off-contract – “maverick spend” • Off contract purchases typically cost the institution 5%-10% more than contract prices. 2010 The Education Advisory Board review recommended

  6. Create Contract Management Positions & Acquire Tools • Make contracts more visible to campus • Maintain database of existing contracts and track vendor compliance • Will help alleviate buyer overload, one factor that is currently hampering strategic sourcing initiatives. • Will improve procurements ability to drive (and track) vendor performance • Places procurement in better negotiating position • Facilitates tracking of milestones, tiers of spend and possible contract overpayments

  7. Contract Management • Managing contracts for? • Leased space, equipment leases, software licenses, maintenance agreements, independent contractors, service contracts • Why is it important? • Contract terms include milestones, remedies, termination, disclosures, renewals, records requests • Business continuity

  8. Lack of Contract Management Function Exacerbating Buyer Overload Number of Buyers and Contract Administrators (Peer Schools)

  9. Purchasing Budget • myUF Market/SciQuest $326,120 2009 implementation, static thru’ 3/27/2018 • Includes current functionality – 30 catalogs • Expenses $56,555 - $60,000 • Staff $1,404,731 - $1,354,561

  10. How much? 2014 Optimal Budget Request Two Contract Managers $134,500 Software $ 80,000 Total request $214,500

  11. What’s it worth? • Goldman Sachs estimates 40 basis points savings in hard and soft costs • Price Waterhouse Coopers estimates 2% of all annual costs • Making contracts visible and compliant is estimated to save 2 – 5%

  12. Potential Savings • ~$144,842,870 spend with contracts • ~$ 11,457,833 of which is addressable spend • 5% = $572,891 Purchasing request: $214,500

  13. Questions? Thank you

More Related