SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Enhancing Governance in Education: Feedback Mechanisms and Local Context

zeroun avatar
11 diapositives · 264 Views · Aug 07, 2014

Dr. Stig Jarle Hansen from the University of Life Sciences, Norway, explores the critical feedback mechanisms necessary for improving governance in education programs. This discussion highlights the challenges of traditional theories in addressing real-world problems, emphasizing the need for context-driven approaches. By addressing political, security, and development interconnections, and aligning educational priorities with local needs, the research advocates for innovative solutions to enhance curriculum relevance. Key feedback sources include students, alumni, and institutional inputs that bridge the theory-practice divide.

Enhancing Governance in Education: Feedback Mechanisms and Local Context - slide 1
01 / 11Enhancing Governance in Education: Feedback Mechanisms and Local Context
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing Governance in Education: Feedback Mechanisms and Local Context
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Feedback mechanisms to change governance education programmes Dr. Stig Jarle Hansen University of Life Sciences, Norway

  2. The Scientist in his Ivory Tower • Descriptive vs problem- solving theory • Golbalised curiculums “Cannons and classics” • The research pillar problem • The quality problem

  3. DAC/OECD criterias of relevance • Take context as the starting point (Conduct political analysis above and beyond quantitative indicators of governance, institutional strength, or conflict). • Align with local priorities. (Acknowledge and accept priorities where governments demonstrate the political will to foster their countries' development) • Recognize the political-security-development nexus. (Support national reformers in developing unified planning frameworks for political, security, humanitarian, economic, and development activities at the country level), the last point also dependent on the local context in relation to security. World Bank. 2005. Fragile States: Good Practices in Country Assistance Strategies. IDA/R2005-0252. Report No. 34790. Washington, DC. OECD 2005c, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/59/55/34700989.pdf

  4. Grounded theory vs the local • “A place like no other??”

  5. Mechanism to solve our dilemmas Feedback mechanisms • Peer review mechanism • Student feedback • Alumni feedback • Institutional feedback • User feedback

  6. Peer review…

  7. Student feedback • Hand-inn • Classfronter • Gimgemma • “The students are not peers of the lecturers, and cannot give substantial feedback regarding curriculum development, except for especially gifted students they simply don’t know enough of the theories, and may have problems seeing the totality of the curriculum. Inexperienced students necessarily pick up the dilemmas faced by local civil servants. ”

  8. Alumni • A cheap network Fundraising Social activity Network based Self selection vs. compulsory Theory practice dilemma

  9. Institutional feedback • University independence • Theory-practice tension • focus

  10. User feedback • Class issue • Empowerment • Theory-practice tension

  11. Conclusion • The problem-solving responsibility of the universities • Alumni