SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Intergovernmental Dynamics

zinnia avatar
20 diapositives · 382 Views · Oct 23, 2014

Intergovernmental Dynamics. Douglas Brown POL 321 October 2007. Intergovernmental Dynamics. How and why IGR occurs Defining Intergovernmental Interests and Positions Geography and territory Economic, social and cultural factors Political and Ideological factors

Intergovernmental Dynamics - slide 1
01 / 20Intergovernmental Dynamics
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Intergovernmental Dynamics
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Intergovernmental Dynamics Douglas Brown POL 321 October 2007

  2. Intergovernmental Dynamics • How and why IGR occurs • Defining Intergovernmental Interests and Positions • Geography and territory • Economic, social and cultural factors • Political and Ideological factors • Explaining Intergovernmental Strategy • Actors and structures • Resources • Strategies and tactics • Outcomes

  3. Intergovernmental Values • Interdependence, not domination • Negotiation and discussion, not voting • Therefore: Diplomacy and Bargaining are the norm • Realist power politics (the strong win most often), but tempered by the constitutional equality of the provinces

  4. Why intergovernmental relations? • Inadequate or uncertain division of powers • Government interdependence • welfare state • globalization • Fiscal efficiency and equity • Regional representation

  5. Intergovernmental interests • “There are no permanent alliances, only permanent interests” (Palmerston) • Provincial and territorial interests defined by geography, society, economy –but also by politics • Federal government alone does not define the “national interests” • Federal position = more than the sum of the parts?

  6. Geography and Territory • Where you sit is where you stand… • Effects of historic patterns of colonization and development • Huge effect of borders and territorial size • Significant variation among units • Big Four / Small 6 + 3 • Geographic differences drive certain issues: e.g. trade, transportation, energy

  7. Culture and Society • French and English-speaking communities • Aboriginal nations • Overall, increasingly multicultural due to immigration • Growing urbanization

  8. Combined effects of Geography and Culture • Dominance of Quebec/Canada relationship due to Que = 80 % French • New Brunswick bilingual • Immigrant settlement concentrated in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver • Aboriginal population growth in west and north • Widening gap: urban/rural

  9. Economic structure and class • Historic pattern of specialized regional economies (centre-periphery // manufacturing vs. resource production) • Wealth diversity among provinces • Dynamics of class organization: farmers, unions, small and big business • Location of economic elites: inside or outside the province?

  10. Effects of economic factors on IGR • Regionally determined positions and interests for broad economic and industrial policy (but less so in free trade era) • Differing fiscal positions (have vs. have-not) • Economic and fiscal positions and interests do change, but slowly

  11. Political and Ideological factors • Significance of political stance towards federalism, especially at federal level: • Expansive, centralizing ideology (Macdonald Conservatives, Trudeau Liberals) • Province-friendly, decentralist ideology (Laurier Liberals, Mulroney Conservatives) • Quebec nationalism (varieties of positions of Quebec governments) • Western and Atlantic alienation (e.g. Alberta, Newfoundland)

  12. Intergovernmental Variables(chap 3, draft textbook) • The actors (and resources) • The working rules and structures • Nature of the issue • Interests, goals and objectives • Strategies and Tactics • Arenas and Interactions • Types of outcomes

  13. Actor variables • Party labels and ideology • Leader’s personality and management style • Bureaucratic norms: professional cooperation vs. adversarial • Relative independence of decision-makers: who gets to close the deal? Can you deliver?

  14. Actor Resources • Financial and human resources • Strategic thinking as a resource • Constitutional resources (legal position, symbolic position) • Political resources • Electoral clout • Power of the underdog, of the hold-out

  15. Working rules and structure • No legal or constitutional status, informal working rules, weak consensus format • Canadian governments can often choose among different forums… • Multilateral, Bilateral, Unilateral • Interprovincial vs. federal-provincial • Formal meetings vs. informal communication

  16. Arenas -- Major Intergovernmental Forums • First Ministers Conferences • Council of the Federation (PT only) • Ministerial Conferences (e.g. Health, Agriculture, Finance, etc.) • Deputy Ministers meetings • task forces, sub-committees • Regional meetings (e.g. Atlantic Premiers Conference)

  17. Strategy and Tactics • Frank appraisal of goals and resources • Adopting a cooperative or a confrontational style • Joining coalitions, building alliances • Having a thought-out fall-back position • Use of media, interest groups, appeals to the public

  18. Types of Outcomes • No agreement – acrimony, continued conflict • No agreement – agree to disagree, do own thing • No agreement – just better understanding, do own thing • Broad agreement – objectives and principles only • Deep agreement – cost-sharing and other jointly funded schemes • Deep agreement – regulatory harmonization, joint agency • Deep agreement – constitutional amendment

  19. Easier No major principle or value at stake Low profile Lower costs Quantitatively divisible Increasing fiscal pie Harder High profile High cost Non-divisible (all or nothing) Highly symbolic Decreasing fiscal pie (zero-sum or worse) Variables affecting outcomes

  20. Overall Spectrum of Canadian IGR • Independent governments (minimal relations) • Consultation (no binding results) • Coordination (meshing goals and strategies) • Collaborative (jointly determined outcomes) • Joint decision-making (cannot act alone) • Asymmetrical