State wide roll out of Decentralised District Planning Process State Planning Commission, MP

1. State wide roll out of Decentralised District Planning Process State Planning Commission, MP

2. WHY DECENTRALIZED PLANNING PROCESS • Enhance participation of local people /PRI & ULBS in planning process • Integrate participatory monitoring, evaluation and learning systems within the planning cycle itself • Prioritize planning in advance for all departments/schemes/sectors especially flagship programmes • Resource matchingwith “preferences of peoples’ demand” and “Departments’ pre-set targets” • Effective efficient use of through access to untied fundsthrough village level plans like CDAP, NREGA, SSA, BRGF plan etc. • Achievement of sectoral goals (MDGs/ 11th 5yr. Plan)through convergence amongst departments and schemes • Enhance sensitivity and accountability towards preferences of people • Build awareness level on schemes • Feedback to improve scheme design • Provideopportunity to build capacitiesof grassroots level govt. functionaries

3. DISTRICT PLANNING PROCESS: RESULT BASED APPROACH • Agreeing to Targets & Implementation strategies • Defining priority areas • Rationalization and optimum utilization of resources • Building of sense of ownership among the people • Identifying champions at every level of implementation • Driving convergences at the district level • Innovations action by the district • Address Social exclusion

4. THE PROCESSES: Planning Planning Process- Rural & Urban: Facilitation to village development committee Consultations with vulnerable group of society such as SC/ST, women, disabled etc. Needs identification Defining prioritization of activities Scheme linkages of activities Sectoral distribution of activities Convergence between schemes, departments and resources Proposed Plan of the village

5. THE PROCESSES: Plan Finalisation Approval of village plan in Gram Sabha Consolidation of Plans of different levels-GP, Block and District Co-option at various levels Integration of rural and urban plans in line with resource envelope Approval by DPC Submission to State (Sharing Workshop)

6. Structure of Institution at District level Gram Sabha (Village Development Committee) Gram Panchayat Janpad Panchayat Zila Panchayat District Planning Committee

7. Mechanism Adopted

8. Basic Needs for Process • Human Resources • Capacity Building • Monitoring • Financial support for carrying out the process • Financial Resources or Resource Envelop (Funds available under District Schemes, state schemes, central schemes, flagship schemes such as NREGA, SSA, NRHM, BRGF etc., and own resources)

9. THE PROCESSES: Support & Training • State level: Discussions/ Master Trainers’ identification/ planning manual/ formats/ software/ training design/ operational guidelines • Orientation Workshops (District level)- District Indicators. vs. MDGs/ Goals of 11th five year plan • Training of Master Trainers (District level) • Formation and Training of TSGs (Block level) • Financial support provided to 5 districts

10. KEY CONTRIBUTORS OF THE PROCESS 2011-12

11. THE PROCESSES: Support & Training • Financial support to roll out the decentralized planning • Trainingsimparted to district and block level government officials • Technical Support Groups (TSGs) facilitated the village/ urban ward plan process

12. Technical Support Group

13. THE PROCESSES: Planning • State and District level Orientation Workshops on Decentralized Planning and Convergence • Integrated District Planning Manualdrafted • Planning Formats developed for each planning unit (village, gram panchayat, janpad, urban wards etc.)

14. THE PROCESSES: Plan Finalization • Consolidation of plans at different levels and approval by District Planning Committee • State level experience sharing Workshop (Nov, 2009) • www.decentralizedplanning.co.in

15. Present Status …….of preparation of various plan through decentralized approach • Rolled- out in all 50 districts. • All flagship and state programmes are taken care of . • Financial support for the participatory planning process. • Resource envelope up to the block level. • Prioritizing Activities by villagers themselves . • Beneficiary identification during the planning process by community themselves . • Assessing status of Basic infrastructure. • Assessing status Delivery of services.

16. Process lead to ; • Approx.13,000 Technical Support Groups (TSGs) were constituted and trained for DPP. • Approx. 78,000 functionaries have been imparted training as part of the roll out process. • Impaneled Technical Support Institutes.

17. VILLAGE MASTER PLAN (SANKALP -14 -ENSURING AVAILIBILITY OF MINIMUM LEVEL OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICESIN ALL VILLAGES)

18. Our website

19. WINDOW FOR KEY OUTPUTS

20. KEY OUTPUTS Process lead to - • Village Master Plan (Summary) • Village Master Plan • Resource Envelop • Panchayat/Block/ District plan • Urban/rural plan • Sector-wise Plan • Departmental Plan • Scheme-wise plan • Demand on Query option Note: Village Master Plan will be provided to all villages.

21. KEY OUTPUTS Process lead to - • Village Master Plan (Summary) • Village Master Plan • Resource Envelop • Panchayat/Block/ District plan • Urban/rural plan • Sector-wise Plan • Departmental Plan • Scheme-wise plan • Demand on Query option Note: Village Master Plan will be provided to all villages.

22. List of Beneficiaries under flagship schemes

23. District Resource Envelope (eg. Satna) Count of Dist. Centre Total Community Dept Difference Scheme Ceiling Share Resources Demand Agriculture 13 126.23 2064.09 2190.32 280.07 1910.25 Cooperatives 2 9.2 9.2 9.2 DES 1 539 539 172.2 366.8 Fisheries 7 53.32 4.3 57.62 22.9 34.72 Forest 2 515 515 515 Handicraft 2 0 0 10.75 -10.75 Hatkarga 3 3.5 3.5 222.93 -219.43 Horticulture 12 105.5 14.66 120.16 1 119.16 Industry 7 101.2 101.2 239.65 -138.45 Khadi and Gramudyog 2 8.66 8.66 8.66 Land Records 2 300 300 3 297 OBC 5 678.56 678.56 678.56 Panchayat 1 895 895 895 Panchayat and social justice 3 1429.31 1317.29 2746.6 63.44 2683.16 Pashupalan 7 11.25 11.25 6.52 4.73 PHE 7 487 487 974 1289.2 -315.2 PWD 2 5617.25 135 5752.25 280.2 5472.05 Rural Development 10 5632 25116.53 30748.53 38159.35 -7410.82 SC (Education) 7 506.6 20 526.6 8.55 518.05 SC Welfare 5 254.5 75 329.5 2037.83 -1708.33 School Education 5 4886.81 4886.81 3258.75 1628.06 SPC 1 300 300 55 245 Sports 7 7.68 7.68 7.68 Tribal - Education 6 186.9 186.9 5 181.9 Tribal -Welfare 13 261.1 (Rs. In Lakhs) 25 286.1 70.65 215.45 Urban 1 103 103 103 WCD 5 1666.47 1666.47 0.011 1666.459 WRD 4 2401.91 2401.91 775.97 1625.94 Grand Total 142 27086.95 29258.87 56345.82 46962.971 9382.849

24. CONVERGENCE of SCHEMES & RESOURCES

25. enhancement of people participation in monitoring and Implementation To make the system people centric, following facilities are being provided on web-site. • Individual can post his name as prospective beneficiary of any given scheme. • Individual can post the progress/status of work in his/her village (monitoring). • Individual can post his/her views, complaint and suggestion relating to works and services

26. Learning's • Need Based Plan based on people participation and consultations with PRI, ULBS, Government functionaries • Convergence of Resources and Manpower • Matching Resources and community needs • Preparation of Plan Well in Advance • Easy to Monitor and Evaluate Through web based software (www.mp.gov.in/spb)

27. Field experiences • Appreciable Efforts by Departments /districts Administration & International Development Agencies (UNICEF, DFID, UNDP etc.) • Conceptualization, operational framework, Capacity Building. • District machinery mobilized to experiment • Paradigm Shifts is clearly visible

28. Thanks Translating outlays in outcome.......... Presented by: Mangesh Tyagi Adviser, State Planning Commission MP