1 / 9

Transparency Regime for Trans-border Gas Flows: fundamentals and ideas

Transparency Regime for Trans-border Gas Flows: fundamentals and ideas. MYKHAILO GONCHAR NOMOS / STRATEGY XXI, UKRAINE Brussels, March 27. Most characteristic features of the gas crises in 2006 and 2009.

zizi
Télécharger la présentation

Transparency Regime for Trans-border Gas Flows: fundamentals and ideas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Transparency Regime for Trans-border Gas Flows: fundamentals and ideas MYKHAILO GONCHAR NOMOS / STRATEGY XXI,UKRAINE Brussels, March 27

  2. Most characteristic features of the gas crises in 2006 and 2009 • crises concerned the whole Europe and took place in trilateral format: gas supplier, transit country and consumer; • none of the crises was prevented by political or legal means; • the crises were resolved by political means; • end users, national governments of consuming countries and the European Commission did not have a complete picture of the crises development based on data from the metering system because the equitable system of gas flow control just does not exist.

  3. General conclusions from 2006 and 2009gas crises: • both on interstate and on intercorporate levels, there are no instruments of trilateral cooperation of governments and companies within a single legal framework; • existing mechanisms at the level of bilateral relations (Ukraine – the EU, Russia – the EU and Ukraine – Russia) are of political and diplomatic nature and do not suggest a possibility of their application in disputes (crises), which arise in trilateral format; • a lack of trilateral mechanism for gas disputes settlement and the single legal framework for regulation of gas relations between three main European actors (Ukraine, Russia and the EU) incites Russia to press for transferring gas crises settlements into the bilateral format “Ukraine – the EU” or “Naftogaz – European consumers”, which allows Russia to avoid assessment (firstly legal one) of its behavior during the gas crises.

  4. Some aspects of the Memorandum RF – EC concerning Early Warning Mechanism (EWM): • the EWM works in retroactive but not preventive mode • the proposed model of the EWM does not include the use of impartial control over energy flows • the proposed EWM is quite unmanageable and difficult to organize • Memorandum’s weak point is a lack of the third Party (transit party), which is an integral part of the technological gas trade chain • the Memorandum is not an international agreement and does not create rights and obligations, regulated by international law

  5. Approximated scheme of the tripartite cooperation (RU-UA-EU case) for EWM Exporter (RU) on-line verification Transmitter (UA) Importer (EU)

  6. General scheme of the Transparency Regime for Trans-border Gas Flowsas an Early Warning Mechanism 1. WORKING PRESSURE 2. INCOMING / OUTCOMING VOLUMES (DAYLY) Exporter (RU) on-line verification Importer (EU) Transmitters EaP countries (UA, BY, MD)

  7. Parameters for on-line monitoring in daily mode in terms of gas sector

  8. Reaction from the European Commission on Energy Transparency Regime

  9. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION! http://geostrategy.org.ua geostrategy@ukr.net mi.gor17@gmail.com

More Related