SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Data Analysis Using R: Multiple linear regression analysis

zubaida-heba avatar
11 diapositives · 435 Views · Nov 13, 2014

Data Analysis Using R: Multiple linear regression analysis. Tuan V. Nguyen Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia. Data. Effects of temperature (x1), time (x2) on CO2 production.

Data Analysis Using R: Multiple linear regression analysis - slide 1
01 / 11Data Analysis Using R: Multiple linear regression analysis
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Data Analysis Using R: Multiple linear regression analysis
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Data Analysis Using R:Multiple linear regression analysis Tuan V. Nguyen Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia

  2. Data • Effects of temperature (x1), time (x2) on CO2 production. Chú thích: y = sản lượng CO2; X1 = thời gian (phút); X2 = nhiệt độ (C); X3 = phần trăm hòa tan; X4 = lượng dầu (g/100g); X5 = lượng than đá; X6 = tổng số lượng hòa tan; X7 = số hydrogen tiêu thụ.

  3. Read data into R y <- c(36.98,13.74,10.08, 8.53,36.42,26.59,19.07, 5.96,15.52,56.61, 26.72,20.80, 6.99,45.93,43.09,15.79,21.60,35.19,26.14, 8.60, 11.63, 9.59, 4.42,38.89,11.19,75.62,36.03) x1 <- c(5.1,26.4,23.8,46.4, 7.0,12.6,18.9,30.2,53.8,5.6,15.1,20.3,48.4, 5.8,11.2,27.9,5.1,11.7,16.7,24.8,24.9,39.5,29.0, 5.5, 11.5, 5.2,10.6) x2 <- c(400,400, 400, 400, 450, 450, 450, 450, 450, 400, 400, 400, 400, 425, 425, 425, 450, 450, 450, 450, 450, 450, 450, 460, 450, 470, 470) x3 <- c(51.37,72.33,71.44,79.15,80.47,89.90,91.48,98.60,98.05,55.69, 66.29,58.94,74.74,63.71,67.14,77.65,67.22,81.48,83.88,89.38, 79.77,87.93,79.50,72.73,77.88,75.50,83.15) x4 <- c(4.24,30.87,33.01,44.61,33.84,41.26,41.88,70.79,66.82, 8.92,17.98,17.79,33.94,11.95,14.73,34.49,14.48,29.69,26.33, 37.98,25.66,22.36,31.52,17.86,25.20, 8.66,22.39) x5 <- c(1484.83, 289.94, 320.79, 164.76, 1097.26, 605.06, 405.37, 253.70, 142.27,1362.24, 507.65, 377.60, 158.05, 130.66, 682.59, 274.20, 1496.51, 652.43, 458.42, 312.25, 307.08, 193.61, 155.96,1392.08, 663.09,1464.11, 720.07) x6 <- c(2227.25, 434.90, 481.19, 247.14,1645.89, 907.59, 608.05, 380.55, 213.40,2043.36, 761.48, 566.40, 237.08,1961.49,1023.89, 411.30,2244.77, 978.64, 687.62, 468.38, 460.62, 290.42, 233.95,2088.12, 994.63,2196.17,1080.11) x7 <- c(2.06,1.33,0.97,0.62,0.22,0.76,1.71,3.93,1.97,5.08,0.60,0.90, 0.63,2.04,1.57,2.38,0.32,0.44,8.82,0.02,1.72,1.88,1.43, 1.35,1.61,4.78,5.88) REGdata <- data.frame(y, x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7)

  4. Results of analysis > reg <- lm(y ~ x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7, data=REGdata) > summary(reg) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -20.035 -4.681 -1.144 4.072 21.214 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 53.937016 57.428952 0.939 0.3594 x1 -0.127653 0.281498 -0.453 0.6553 x2 -0.229179 0.232643 -0.985 0.3370 x3 0.824853 0.765271 1.078 0.2946 x4 -0.438222 0.358551 -1.222 0.2366 x5 -0.001937 0.009654 -0.201 0.8431 x6 0.019886 0.008088 2.459 0.0237 * x7 1.993486 1.089701 1.829 0.0831 . --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 10.61 on 19 degrees of freedom Multiple R-Squared: 0.728, Adjusted R-squared: 0.6278 F-statistic: 7.264 on 7 and 19 DF, p-value: 0.0002674

  5. Inter-correlations

  6. Stepwise regression reg <- lm(y ~ ., data=REGdata) step(reg, direction=”both”)

  7. Stepwise regression

  8. Stepwise regression

  9. Bayesian Model Average (BMA) analysis library(BMA) xvars <- REGdata[,-1] co2 <- REGdata[,1] bma <- bicreg(xvars, co2, strict=FALSE, OR=20) summary(bma)

  10. Bayesian Model Average (BMA) analysis 16 models were selected Best 5 models (cumulative posterior probability = 0.6599 ): p!=0 EV SD model 1 model 2 model 3 model 4 model 5 Intercept 100.0 5.75672 14.6244 2.5264 6.1441 8.6120 7.5936 7.3537 x1 12.4 -0.01807 0.1008 . . . -0.1393 . x2 10.4 -0.00075 0.0282 . . . . . x3 10.7 0.00011 0.0791 . . . . -0.0572 x4 20.2 -0.03059 0.1020 . . -0.1419 . . x5 10.5 -0.00023 0.0030 . . . . . x6 100.0 0.01815 0.0040 0.0185 0.0193 0.0164 0.0162 0.0179 x7 73.7 1.60766 1.2821 2.1857 . 2.1628 2.1233 2.2382 nVar 2 1 3 3 3 r2 0.700 0.636 0.709 0.704 0.701 BIC -25.8832 -24.0238 -23.4412 -22.9721 -22.6801 post prob 0.311 0.123 0.092 0.072 0.063

  11. Bayesian Model Average (BMA) analysis imageplot.bma(bma)