1 / 6

Understanding Bias in Educational Assessment: Analyzing Gender Performance

This study explores common biases in educational settings, specifically focusing on gender performance. It highlights the notable difference in performance outcomes between girls and boys, evidenced by the number of stars awarded for performance. The findings suggest that girls outperform boys significantly, particularly in reading skills. The analysis also includes statistical jargon, such as standard deviation and chi-squared index, to provide insights into the validity of the marking scheme. The implications of these findings could inform teaching practices and assessment strategies.

zubin
Télécharger la présentation

Understanding Bias in Educational Assessment: Analyzing Gender Performance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bias Can you avoid it? Common forms of bias to avoid.

  2. Survey outcome Girls clearly outperform boys in performance as shown by the number of stars awarded. Girls are also more advanced in their reading skills. Girls clearly outperform boys in performance as shown by the number of stars awarded. Reality – there are only 10 boys in this class, 22 girls, of which 16 girls have birthdays in September, October and November. All bar one of the boys have birthdays after March.

  3. Jargon • The standard deviation of the attendance from the first school is worse than the variance in the second school • 10% of that 80% of poor readers could not punctuate correctly • The chi-squared index of 5.5 shows errors in the marking scheme.

  4. Sample Size = 4

  5. Mean, Mode, Median and Range

More Related