1 / 9

Principles of good participation

This presentation outlines key principles of good participation based on a World Café format, emphasizing the importance of including non-elected individuals and groups in decision-making processes. It highlights participatory processes that are open to public input, utilizing various deliberation methods. The session discusses evaluation criteria focusing on fairness, competence, and the normative basis of participatory practices. It explores different perspectives on public participation, aiming to design processes that meet participant needs while encouraging flexibility and reflection by planners.

zuwena
Télécharger la présentation

Principles of good participation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Principles of good participation Short presentation and world café Felix Rauschmayer, UFZ Marie Curie Research Training Network, Contract No. MRTN-CT-2006-035536

  2. Participation • Involvement of individuals or groups who are not part of the elected or appointed legal decision making bodies in preparing, making or implementing collectively binding decisions.   • A participatory process is open to public input; possibly including new forms of deliberation. • Public (citizen) or stakeholder participation. Participation can take place through representation when the stakeholders are organised (e.g. environmental NGO’s). Kick-off Meeting

  3. Evaluation criteria • Multitude of different lists • Fairness and competence (Webler/Renn) • GoverNat evaluation grid • Dependent on aims of participation • differ according to the person asked • Abstract norms or context-related criteria • Output-, outcome- vs. process-oriented Kick-off Meeting

  4. Normativity of criteria • Evaluation criteria need a basis for their normativity • Discourse ethics / utilitarianism / pragmatism / • Abstract norms or case-specific • Scientists should not select the basis • Scientists can present a covering list of criteria • Recommending scientists can‘t escape normativity, but they can make it more explicit Kick-off Meeting

  5. Webler and Tuler 2006 • Based on Webler et al. 2001 • 4 perspectives on appropriate public participation process • Science-centered consultation • Egalitarian deliberation • Efficient Cooperation • Informed Collaboration Kick-off Meeting

  6. Policy implications (Webler et al. 2001) • Design a process that meets the needs and desires of the potential participants • Reflect carefully on what participants and planners expect of the process • Be familiar with participation techniques and resources available • Build in flexibility Kick-off Meeting

  7. questions • What are - according to you - main goals of participatory processes? • Can you group or classify them? • Can you deduce principles of good participation from these goals? • Can you group or classify them? Kick-off Meeting

  8. Schedule • Documentation on posters • Oldest person hosts the table • Younger persons are ambassadors • Presentation • 11:15-11:30 • First question: • 11:30-11:50 1st round • 11:50-12:10 2nd round • 12:10-12:20 3rd round • Second question: • 12:20-12:40 3rd round • Plenary • 12:40-13:00 Kick-off Meeting

  9. questions • What are - according to you - main goals of participatory processes? • Can you group or classify them? • Can you deduce principles of good participation from these goals? • Can you group or classify them? Kick-off Meeting

More Related