1 / 22

Secondary structure prediction from amino acid sequence

Secondary structure prediction from amino acid sequence. Homology: Paralogs and orthologs . a. duplication. a. b. Paralogs = gene families in same species. speciation. a. b. a. b. orthologs. species 1. species 2. DNA sequence. Automatic translation.

ahava
Télécharger la présentation

Secondary structure prediction from amino acid sequence

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Secondarystructureprediction from amino acid sequence

  2. Homology: Paralogs and orthologs a duplication a b Paralogs = gene families in same species speciation a b a b orthologs species 1 species 2

  3. DNA sequence Automatic translation Physico-chemical properties (e. g., using EMBOSS suite) Amino acid primary sequence Primary db searches FASTA, BLAST 1. Search for sequence homologue(s) and construct an alignment 2. Homologue(s) with known 3D structure? Homology modelling available 3. Motif recognition: Search secondary databases Secondary structure prediction Fold assignment

  4. Chou-Fasman Parameters • Amino acid propensities

  5. Accuracy of prediction • Q3 score Q3 = qa+qb+qcoil X 100% total no. of residues

  6. Recent improvements • The availability of large families of homologous sequences has greatly enhanced secondary structure prediction. • The combination of sequence data in multiple alignments with sophisticated computing techniques such as neural networks has lead to accuracies well in excess of 70 %. • The limit of 70-80% may be a function of secondary structure variation within homologous proteins.

  7. Stereochemical analysis Patterns of residue conservation are indicative of particular secondary structure types. Alpha helices have a periodicity of 3.6. Many alpha helices in proteins are amphipathic, meaning that one face is pointing towards the hydrophobic core and the other towards the solvent. Patterns of hydrophobic residue conservation showing the i, i+3, i+4, i+7 pattern are highly indicative of an alpha helix. XOOXXOOX

  8. Stereochemical analysis The geometry of beta strands means that adjacent residues have their side chains pointing in oppposite directions. Beta strands that are half buried in the protein core will tend to have hydrophobic residues at positions i, i+2, i+4, i+8 etc, and polar residues at positions i+1, i+3, i+5, etc. XOXOXOXOXO

  9. Stereochemical analysis Beta strands that are completely buried (as is often the case in proteins containing both alpha helices and beta strands) usually contain a run of hydrophobic residues. XXXXXXXXXXXX

  10. Helical transmembrane proteins + • Strong hydrophobicity signal from membrane spanning regions, each ~25 residues in length • Predominance of positively charged amino acid residues on cytoplasmic side • Prediction accuracy with multiple alignment = 95%

  11. Helical transmembrane proteins • ~30% of top 100 drugs bind to membrane proteins • Difficult to determine experimentally • But much easier to predict than globular proteins! • TMpred – based on statistical analysis of transmembrane proteins • TMHMM – based on Hidden Markov Model

  12. Protein Structure Classification Class(C) secondary structure content – mainly alpha, mainly beta, alpha/beta, few secondary structures (type) Architecture(A) gross arrangement of sec. structure elements (type and number of SS elements) Topology(T) shape and connectivity of SS (type, number and order of SS elements) Homologous superfamily (H) http://www.cathdb.info/latest/index.html

  13. Topology

  14. Homologous domains, share common ancestor Fold families Class Architecture Topology H-level

  15. In CATH, the assignments of structures to fold groups and homologous superfamilies are made by sequence and structure comparisons. Homologous domains, share common ancestor Fold families Class Architecture Topology H-level

  16. Homologous domain family ? Architecture: ‘Barrel’ 9 Topologies : type of SS, number and order

  17. Secondary structure prediction methods • PSI-pred (PSI-BLAST profiles used for prediction; David Jones, Warwick) • JPRED Consensus prediction (includes many of the methods given below; Cuff & Barton, EBI) • DSC King & Sternberg • PREDATORFrischman & Argos (EMBL) • PHD home page Rost & Sander, EMBL, Germany • ZPRED server Zvelebil et al., Ludwig, U.K. • nnPredict Cohen et al., UCSF, USA. • BMERC PSA Server Boston University, USA • SSP (Nearest-neighbor) Solovyev and Salamov, Baylor College, USA. http://speedy.embl-heidelberg.de/gtsp/secstrucpred.html

  18. Consensus prediction method hydrophobic highly conserved b= buried, e = exposed

  19. Consensus prediction method -JPRED hydrophobic amphipathic hydrophobic highly conserved b= buried, e = exposed

  20. Neural network prediction - PHD Multiple alignment of protein family SS profile for window of adjacent residues

  21. Hidden Markov Models-HMMSTR amino acid secondary structure element structural context Markov state • Recurrent local features of protein sequences • Accuracy of 74% • Bystroff et al., 2000

More Related