1 / 18

AFP Project Organization and Next Steps

AFP Project Organization and Next Steps. Marco Bruschi (CERN/INFN Bologna) AFP Kick Off meeting – September 20 th 2012. Next steps to the approval process Organization chart IB composition. Next steps to the approval process.

kenda
Télécharger la présentation

AFP Project Organization and Next Steps

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AFPProject Organization and Next Steps • Marco Bruschi (CERN/INFN Bologna) • AFP Kick Off meeting – September 20th2012 • Next steps to the approval process • Organization chart • IB composition

  2. Next steps to the approval process • In the next slides I will address the formal steps leading to the approval of the project (LHCC and RRB approval is the final step) • This process was initiatedfor AFP with the Technical and Physics review we passed at the beginning of this week. Another iteration has been requested • The outcome of these two reviews is encouraging, although some important points should be seriously considered by the AFP group, namely: • The finalization of the design of the HBP and its final qualification • Providing more quantitative details about the physics potential of AFP • The next weeks should be devoted to answer in a documented way the questions risen from the Technical and Physics review • The next appointment should then be the presentation of a set of milestones until the detectors installation: • agreed by the extended institute board • presented at the next AUW (Nov 18th -23rd) • finally presented to the ATLAS management • Use the AFP session at the next ATLAS week to start discussion about organization of AFP management and activities (October 2nd)

  3. APPROVAL PROCESShttps://edms.cern.ch/document/1093133/5 fall 2013/spring 2014 summer 2014 fall 2014 end 2014 TB: spring 2014 (Sep 17th ) (Sep 20th ) (Sep 18th )

  4. APPROVAL PROCESS

  5. Organization chart (Management) FD PL M. Bruschi (Bologna) AFP INT. PL C. Royon (Saclay) FD IB H. Stenzel (Giessen) AFP TC TBA FD TC Interface with LHC: D. Macina(CERN) Si Tracker P. Sicho (Prague) C. Davia (Manchester) Timing M. Rijssenbeek (S. Brook) Brandt (Arlington) Physics Kupco (Prague) ??? Movable Beam Pipe G. Spigo (CERN) • AFP PL elected by the AFP institutes at the end of the TDR • A TC is URGENTLY NEEDED. Procedure to select her/him should start asap • Upgrade Project Coordination meeting (Frequent, to follow the regular development of the activity): PL, AFP TC, FD TC, Physics coords, Silicon Coords, Timing Coords • General meetings: Organized frequently by the PL, Opened to all the members which are contributing to the project. All the main decisions, status of the project and general strategy are discussed at these meetings

  6. Full Organization Chart: Physics

  7. FD and AFP Institutes • 20 FD Institutes • 20 Institutes expressed strong interest to join AFP • 12 NEW Institutes • 9 Institutes are considering to join • Final list at the end of TDR/MOU

  8. Conclusions • Big effort from the AFP 210m community from January 2011 to become one of the upgrade project • Intense and successful work of a group which is becoming stronger and stronger • The forthcoming year will be crucial to obtain the final approval from the ATLAS collaboration • This time should be devoted to: • Finalize the HBP design + final prototyping • Finalize other R&D + final prototyping • Improve the present knowledge on as many as possible physics cases • strengthen the collaboration and finally reinforce the weak points about manpower and funding • writing the TDR and aim to final approval in 2014

  9. LET’S MOVE FORWARD !

  10. Backup

  11. Upgrade Project Management Team

  12. MOU

  13. Upgrade Project Institute Board

  14. ATLAS Phase-I LoI Timeline 2011 4th March: Phase-I Sub-committee presentation to ATLAS Week 29th July: 2011 Phase-I Sub-committee report competed 14th Oct: LoI Sub-section author presentations to ATLAS week 4th Nov:“Independent Readers” appointed in consultation with EB 29th Nov: LoI Draft-0 released on CDS for comment to collaboration 6th Dec: LHCC status report and presentation to ATLAS weekly 13th Dec: Deadline for ATLAS comments to Draft-0 20th Dec: Draft-1 released and made available to LHCC for comment 2012 11th Jan: Deadline for Draft-1 comments 12h Jan: EB endorsement 17th Jan: Draft-2 sent to ATLAS CB and for information to LHCC 3rd Feb: Request CB approval 17th Feb: Final minor corrections and submit for printing 22nd March: Next LHCC 27th March: Next UAB (Stanford during ATLAS Upgrade Week) 23rd April: Next LHC RRB

  15. Reminder: Cost Estimation LHC RRB Meeting April 2012: M. Nessi on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration https://indico.cern.ch/materialDisplay.py?contribId=21&sessionId=3&materialId=slides&confId=174803 • First cost estimation presented in the LOI = 36 MCHF NEXT STEPS: Def. 5 projects  Internal review process  EB, CB approval  TDR + MOUs (2012/2013) (2013/2014) (Next cost estimation revision with TDRs) https://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1402470/(CERN-LHCC-2011-012 )

  16. ATLAS CORE Guidelines • Basic idea • Focus on direct production costs (“externalized costs”) • Exclude basic infrastructure, personnel costs • Guidelines in consultation with W Bartel (DESY) • CORE thus includes things like • components (but not necessarily spares, except in TDAQ) • production (incl. industrial manpower but not institute manpower) • outsourced parts of assembly • outsourced parts of installation, commissioning • CORE does NOT include items such as • infrastructure (i.e. production area, halls, tech support etc.) • R&D, design, (early stage) prototyping • institute manpower, physicists • taxes • contingency ATLAS Resources Coordination

More Related