1 / 25

Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration

Recent results from STAR at RHIC. Ultra-relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions, A+A Spin structure of the nucleon, p+p Ultra-peripheral Heavy Ion Collisions.  . Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration. Outline. Introduction

nira
Télécharger la présentation

Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Recent results from STAR at RHIC • Ultra-relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions, A+A • Spin structure of the nucleon, p+p • Ultra-peripheral Heavy Ion Collisions   Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration

  2. Outline • Introduction • The STAR detector at RHIC • High-pt phenomena – probe the medium • Collective dynamics – bulk properties • Conclusions / Outlook

  3. QCD on the Lattice • 1) Large increase in  ! • Large increase in Ndof: Hadrons vs. partons 2) TC~ 170 MeV robust! • Z. Fodor et al, JHEP 0203:014(02) • C.R. Allton et al, hep-lat/0204010 • F. Karsch, Nucl. Phys. A698, 199c(02). Lattice calculations predict TC ~ (170  15) MeV

  4. Heavy Ion Collisions Time  1) Initial condition: 2) System evolves: 3) Bulk freeze-out: - baryon transfer - parton/hadron expansion - hadronic dof - ET production - interaction cease - Partonic dof Tth, <bT> Plot: Steffen A. Bass, Duke University

  5. The STAR Collaboration 400 Collaborators, 49 Institutions, 9 Countries

  6. The STAR Detector

  7. STAR Au + Au Collisions at RHIC Central Event (real-time Level 3)

  8. Au + Au @ 130 GeV || < 0.75 More central collisions Centrality Definition • No direct measure of impact parameter • Use track multiplicity to define collision centrality K.H. Ackermann et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 402

  9. Particle Identification Reconstruct multi-strange resonances in 2p acceptance of STAR!

  10. Partonic Energy Loss • Partons lose energy due to interactions with the mediumJ.D. Bjorken, FERMILAB-Pub-82/59-THY (1982). • Energy loss is a measure of the gluon densityX.N. Wang and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1480 (1992). leading particle suppressed hadrons q q Quenched dijets  measure a) leading hadrons (inclusive) b) leading di-hadron correlations (back to back)

  11. 1.0 1.0 1.0 RAA ~ unity for peripheral collisions, at pT > 2GeV/cRAA < unity, decreasing with centrality  ‘jet quenching’? RAA: binary-scaled Au+Au / p+p RAA More central collisions p+p-reference: UA1, C. Albajar et al., NPB 335 (1990) 261.

  12. RAA for Identified Particles • pT = 2-6GeV/c:K0, L show different behavior! • Meson / Baryon effect ? • Mass effect ?

  13. Jets in High Energy Collisions Find this …………………………………… in here Central Au+Au Event p+p dijet

  14. Parton Jet Py (GeV/c) Df -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Px (GeV/c) -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 How to Find Jets • Df - Correlation with respect to leading particle (>4 GeV/c) • Consider only particles above 2 GeV/c • jet-cone at Df 0 ? • back to back jet-coneat Df p ?

  15. Azimuthal Correlations • ‘jet cone’ at Df = 0 • Strong back to back correlations in peripheral Au+Au collisions • Suppression of back to back correlations in central collisions •  ‘jet-quenching’?  C. Adler et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 082302 (2003).

  16. ? High-pT Particle Production @ RHIC • Suppression of inclusive particle production (a) • Suppression of back-to-back correlations in most central Au+Au collision (b) Consistent with jet quenching scenario: • frequent interactions • medium opaque to fast partons Naïve Surface emission?

  17. Pressure, Flow, … • Thermodynamic identity • – entropy p – pressure U – energy V – volume t = kBT, thermal energy per dof • In A+A collisions, interactions among constituentsand density distribution lead to: pressure gradient  collective flow • number of degrees of freedom (dof) • Equation of State (EOS) • accumulative – partonic + hadronic

  18. (anti-)Protons From RHIC 130 GeV Au + Au Collisions, STAR Preliminary More central collisions • In central collisions, mt distributions become more convex  collective flow ! • 2) Within |y|<0.5, dN/dy and <pT> are flat boost invariant !

  19. Transverse Collective Flow At pT ~ 2-3 GeV/c, yields approach each other. Heavier mass particles show stronger collective flow effects ! At what stage does the collectivity develop at RHIC?

  20. dN/dpt Distributions STAR central data, preliminary p Tth=107±8 [MeV] <bt>=0.55±0.08 [c] n=0.65±0.09 2/dof=106/90 • Two-parameter fit describes yields ofp, K, p, L • Tth = 90  10 MeV • <bt> = 0.55  0.08 c ] c)-1 K (dE/dx) K (kink) [(GeV/ solid lines: fit range p dy N T dp L 2 d p 2

  21. Kinetic Freeze-out Systematic • Stronger transverse flow at RHIC:bT= 0.55(c) More explosive expansion ! <bt> Tfo

  22. T versus <bt> Plane • In central collisions,p, K, p, L (group-I) are different from multi-strange baryons X and W (group-II). • In peripheral collisions, group-I moves towards the local minimum of group-II. •  Multi-strange particles seem to freeze-out earlier than p, K, p, L ! •  Measure X and W to possibly access partonic stage !

  23. Conclusions • Moderately high transverse momentum - frequent interactions at RHIC • Low transverse momentum- strong collective motion at RHIC • collectivity among quarks/gluons or hadrons?

  24. Outlook • Discover partonic collectivity: spectra and v2 of • Ks f L X W DLc J/...

More Related