1 / 18

ASC X12 CHAIR REPORT

ASC X12 CHAIR REPORT. Kendra L. Martin, ASC X12 Chair February 8, 1999. X12 Membership. 1000. 848. 842. 838. 800. 787. 782. 728. 600. FY 93. FY 94. FY 95. FY 96. FY 97. FY 98. ASC X12 Members by State. White = States with 0-5 Members Light Turquoise = States with 6-15 Members

selena
Télécharger la présentation

ASC X12 CHAIR REPORT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ASC X12 CHAIR REPORT Kendra L. Martin, ASC X12 Chair February 8, 1999

  2. X12 Membership 1000 848 842 838 800 787 782 728 600 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98

  3. ASC X12 Members by State White = States with 0-5 Members Light Turquoise = States with 6-15 Members Turquoise = States with 16-25 Members Sky Blue = States with 26-35 Members Blue = States with 36-50 Members Dark Blue = States with 51+ Members

  4. Computer Insurance Transportation 7% 12% 7% Healthcare Banking & Financial 13% 8% Service Industry 7% Software 14% Government 7% Consulting Manufacturing Other 11% 7% 7% General Industry TypesComprising X12 Membership

  5. $700,000 $635,000 $607,300 $578,500 $600,000 $564,000 $474,000 $500,000 $464,000 $424,800 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $0 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Projected Net Surplus X12 Publications Net Revenue Grows

  6. X12 Meeting Attendance

  7. 350 304 295 300 273 256 250 232 195 200 150 100 50 0 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 X12 Draft Standards for Trial Use Published in Annual Release

  8. 11 Accounting, Auditing, Reg. & Financial Info Serv. Arch., Eng. & Construct. 13 Customs 10 Directory Support Services 9 Finance 45 22 Healthcare Insurance 53 Material Management 13 Product Quality Data 9 Purchasing 27 44 Social Security, Employment & Education Statistics 16 Transportation 57 Travel, Tourism & Leisure 29 Other 6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 UN/EDIFACT Messages

  9. 800 747 700 639 589 600 501 500 400 339 320 300 200 100 0 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Projected X12 Data MaintenanceRequests Processed

  10. KEY 1999 CHALLENGES • Six-Month Publication Cycle and Revised Procedures • Next Generation EC Standards

  11. 6-Month Publication Cycle • Proposed Schedule Changes • 4 meetings each year: Feb, May, Aug, Nov • 2 publication updates: following May & Nov meetings • 4 maintenance cycles each year • No interim TAS meetings • Proposed Process Changes • Re-designate DSTU’s as X12 Standards • Treat new Transaction Sets as maintenance to X12.1 • 4 ballot periods each year: 30 days vs. 45 days • Eliminate rebuttal ballots in favor of Open Forums

  12. Benefits of Adopting this Proposal • Improves quality of the standard • Reduces cycle time for simple changes • Retains consensus process • Provides flexible meeting options • Allows better process alignment with EDIFACT • Reduces publication updates (3 to 2) • Reduces TAS meetings (6 to 4)

  13. Drawbacks of Adopting this Proposal • Makes meeting attendance difficult to plan • Potentially requires Subcommittees and PRB to meet 4 times/year • Requires some X12 process change • Puts heavy reliance on DISA staff processes

  14. Membership Reaction to Proposal • 60 members responded to survey (out of 761 surveyed) • 30 responders included suggestions for change • Broad agreement with process changes but resistance to schedule changes

  15. Proposed Path Forward Feb 99 StC* conducts straw poll on balloting of schedule changes Feb/Jun 99 X12 member review/comment on OPM/SD2 changes Jun 99 StC authorizes 2 ballots on Schedule & OPM/SD2 changes Jun/Oct 99 X12 member ballots on Schedule & OPM/SD2 changes Oct 99 StC decides whether/when to implement schedule changes StC confirmation of OPM/SD2 ballot Feb 00 Earliest potential start-up of new schedule and/or process * Steering Committee

  16. 1/99 Steering CommitteeSITG Decisions • Continue the active leadership role in UN/CEFACT in defining the next generation of EDI standards • Pursue the concept of OO-edi development as the next generation of EDI standards • Begin defining an organization to support the next generation of EDI standards development process within X12 • Proceed with the SITG Demonstration Project

  17. SITG Day of Presentations 8:30-10 am Introduction to SITG and Status Report 10-11 am Open edi, UML Modeling & Object Technology 11 am-noon Repository 1-2 pm SITG Demonstration Project 2-2:30 pm Towards the New Millennium (UN/ECE) 2:30-3 pm UML to XML Mappings 3-4:30 pm X12 Impact, Open Issues & General Discussion

  18. THIS WEEK’S AGENDA: • Discussion of Six-Month Publication Cycle Proposal • Schedule Changes • Process Changes • Education on Strategic Implementation Task Group activities

More Related