1 / 56

Donald Fournier Building Research Council School of Architecture University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

WMRC Sustainability Seminar. Donald Fournier Building Research Council School of Architecture University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Sustainability, Energy, and the Energy/Water Nexus. Overview. Background (US and World Energy situation). Sustainability and the tech fix.

Ava
Télécharger la présentation

Donald Fournier Building Research Council School of Architecture University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WMRC Sustainability Seminar Donald FournierBuilding Research CouncilSchool of Architecture University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Sustainability, Energy, and the Energy/Water Nexus

  2. Overview • Background (US and World Energy situation). • Sustainability and the tech fix. • Can we get there? • The Energy Water/ Nexus.

  3. Source: DOE/EIA International Energy Outlook 2007 World Energy Use (Quads)

  4. Source: DOE/EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2007 US Energy Use (Quads)

  5. Source: DOE/EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2006 US Electric Generation by Fuel 2006 – 4,065 B kWh Billion kWh Should be 3927 B kWh (2 years ahead)

  6. Source: ASPO Sep 2006 Actual Production 2003 – 79.62 Mbd 2004 – 83.12 Mbd 2005 – 84.63 Mbd 2006 – 84.60 Mbd 2007 – 84.34 Mbd

  7. DOE/EIA, November 2007 Petroleum Prices

  8. Natural Gas Prices

  9. Source: DOE/EIA 2007 Source: DOE/EIA 2007 (thru August) Natural Gas Prices

  10. Source: DOE/EIA 2007 Coal Prices

  11. U.S. Energy Flows 2006 69% 22% Source: DOE/EIA 2007

  12. Renewable Energy US Energy Production Last year: PV grew 33% Wind grew 27% Biofuels grew >23% Coal grew 2.5% Natural Gas grew 2.3% Oil grew 1.0% Nuclear Electric grew 1.0%

  13. Atmospheric CO2

  14. Carbon Emissions “Unknowingly, the architecture and building community is responsible for almost half of all U.S. greenhouse gas emissions annually. Globally the percentage is even greater.” US Energy Information Administration statistics Graphic Published first in Metropolis Magazine, October 2003 Issue

  15. Energy Trends in Buildings Average energy consumption (Btu/sq. ft) Before 1920 80,127 1920 – 1945 90,234 1946 – 1959 80,198 1960 – 1969 90,976 1970 – 1979 94,968 1980 – 1989 100,077 1990 – 1999 88,834 2000 – 2003 79,703

  16. Source: EIA/DOE 2006 Energy Book • They predict no improvement in efficiency for the next 30 years for new or existing! • What are they smoking???? Or ????

  17. Opportunity for Change • Each year in the United States, we tear down approximately 1.75 billion square feet of buildings, renovate 5 billion square feet, and build new another 5 billion square feet. • During the next 30 years, some 50 billion square feet will be torn down, some 150 billion will be renovated, and another 150 billion will be built new. • By 2030, three-quarters of the built environment will be either new or renovated. AIA COTE: Ecology and Design: Ecological Literacy in Architecture Education, 2006

  18. AIA 2030 Position Statement • Promote sustainable design including resource conservation to achieve a minimum 50 percent reduction from the current level of consumption of fossil fuels used to construct and operate new and renovated buildings by the year 2010, and promote further reductions of remaining fossil fuel consumption by 10 percent or more in each of the following five years. Source: AIA November 2005

  19. AIA 2010 Goals • AIA baseline is ENERGY STAR® Target Finder. • This is the average building of that type in that weather region. • Average Office building in Chicago uses: • 92.3 kBtu/sf (5,000 sf) • 101.5 kBtu/sf (20,000 sf) • 113.3 kBtu/sf (100,000 sf) • Pretty weak standard! • ASHRAE Std 90.1-1999 yields about 67 kBtu/sf for an office building (including plug loads). • If we target 30% below that (about 47 kBtu/sf), you will get an AIA 2010 building.

  20. ASHRAE Actions • Advanced Energy Design Guides: • 30%, 50%, 75%, then Net Zero Energy • Small Buildings (<20,000sf) • Office, Retail, K-12 Schools, Warehouses, Highway Lodging, High-rise Residential, and Existing Buildings. • Schedule: • Complete all 30% guides by 2008. • Complete all 50% guides by 2011. • Complete all 70% guides by 2016. • Complete “net-zero” guidance 2020.

  21. ASHRAE Actions/Initiatives • Standard 90.1-2007 Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Bldgs - 5 to -7% below 2004. • Standard 90.1-2010 Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Bldgs 30 percent reduction from 90.1-2004. • California requiring commercial buildings to be net zero energy by 2020 and residential building to be net zero energy by 2030.

  22. Why Be Energy Efficient? • Reduce operating costs. • Stabilize atmospheric carbon & reduce global climate change impacts. • Improve the quality of life in our buildings and communities. • The energy efficiency policies, building and appliance codes, incentives, and technology improvements in the U.S. since the mid-1970s now avoid the use of approximately: • 40 quadrillion Btu—roughly 40 percent of the energy currently consumed. • Emission of more than 2 billion tons of CO2 per year.

  23. Energy Efficiency • The cost of saving energy is going down while the price of energy is going up. • Efficiency is the cleanest, cheapest, safest, and most secure source energy we have. • These savings from energy efficiency to date have not yet come close to tapping the full potential for savings. • Incentives are available under EPAct 2005 to get deductions and tax credits for energy efficiency and renewable energy.

  24. Energy Opportunities • SEDAC has looked at about 200 commercial buildings. • Potential energy savings ranged from a high of 80% to a low of 3%for existing buildings and between 86% and 12% for new designs. • Data from 70 existing buildings shows: • 32% energy savings. • 34% energy cost savings. • Data from 39 new building designs shows: • 41% energy savings. • 38% energy cost savings.

  25. Implications • We estimate is costs a client about $68/million Btu to save energy. This is heavily weighted towards retrofits. • Our program of analysis costs about $16/million Btu of recommended savings. • Current energy costs are around $11/MBtu of Natural Gas and $27/MBtu of Electricity. • Energy savings are about 1/3 electricity and 2/3 natural gas. • Weighted cost of about $17 with a 4 year payback. (Not good enough for many businesses.)

  26. Sustainability for a Region • Analyzed Fort Bragg, Fayetteville, NC, and the eight counties around it. • Modeled dynamic urban growth for 35 years into the future. • Develop energy and water projections associated with that growth based on business as usual. • Analyzed potential interventions to change the future.

  27. Project Future Change Land Use Evolution and Impact Assessment Model (LEAM) Columbus/Ft Benning

  28. Fort Bragg2000-20353% population growth per year

  29. Perform Gap Analysis 2030 2000 + 500,000 population + 200,000 households + 260 million sq. ft. of commercial/industrial - 19,000 acres of agriculture - 34,000 acres of forest

  30. The Concept Preferred Future State Possible Future Outcomes resulting from actions taken along the way Current State Current-Trend

  31. Energy Model

  32. Total Energy 41% Increase

  33. Energy Interventions • Building Code Adoption over time: • 2010 – 30% Reduction • 2015 – 50% Reduction • 2020 – 75% Reduction • 2025 – Net Zero Energy Buildings • Existing Building Initiatives: • 2015 – 20% Target • 2025 – 40% Target • Agricultural Initiatives: • 2015 – Energy Efficiency 35% Potential • 2015 – Renewable Energy 25% Potential • Transportation Initiatives (2012 – 40%): • Biofuels • GHG Standards • HEV/PHEV Penetration

  34. Energy Efficiency And Renewables

  35. Energy Intervention Scenario

  36. Air Emissions Model

  37. Air Emissions A 48% Increase

  38. Air Emissions

  39. Regional CO2 Implications

  40. Water Model

  41. Intervention BMPs • Fort Bragg (2004) • Public System Water Loss Control (2010) • Commercial/Industrial Water Conservation Program (2012) • Resident Water Conservation Program (2015) • Agricultural Water Conservation Program (2018)

  42. Regional Actions • Regional intervention requires long tern approached with regional stakeholders to enable planning initiatives. • Intervention done in a timely manner can made a tremendous difference in a region. • The trick is getting all the vested interests to engage and actually start to change policy for a sustainable future • Incentives are required to get people to adopt new technology and new ways. • Water is more intractable than energy.

  43. Earth’s Water

  44. Energy/Water Nexus • The major fresh water consuming sectors are not buildings – they are agriculture and thermoelectric power. • Agriculture and thermoelectric use about 40% each, while buildings use about 12% of the supply. • Our energy security is closely linked to the state of our water resources. Water resources are require to achieve any sort of energy security in the years and decades ahead. • Our water security cannot be guaranteed without careful attention to related energy issues. The two issues are inextricably linked.

More Related