1 / 29

“ Evidence based rehabilitation”

Professor Cath Sackley PhD, MSc, MCSP, FCOT Rehabilitation Sciences, University of East Anglia. “ Evidence based rehabilitation”. A cluster randomised controlled trial of an occupational therapy intervention for residents with stroke living in UK care-homes.

Gabriel
Télécharger la présentation

“ Evidence based rehabilitation”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Professor Cath Sackley PhD, MSc, MCSP, FCOT Rehabilitation Sciences, University of East Anglia “Evidence based rehabilitation”

  2. A cluster randomised controlled trial of an occupational therapy intervention for residents with stroke living in UK care-homes. Cath Sackley, Marion Walker, Andrea Roalfe, Caroline Watkins, Chris Burton, Jonathan Mant, Karen Lett, Keith Wheatley, Bart Sheehan, Lesley Sharp, Katie Stant, Sheriden Bevan, Farzana Rashid, Joanna Fletcher Smith, Kerry Steel, Guy Peryer, Gina Sands, Joanna Briggs, Kate Wilde, Peter Sharp, Lisa Irvine, Garry Barton, Kath Mortimer, Max Feltham National Institute for Health Research. NIHR HTA

  3. Research Programme through clinical interest

  4. ~ 25% of all stroke survivors are unable to go home after their stroke Significant rise in the number of people living with stroke related disabilities between 1990 – 2010 Stroke survivors residing in care homes are more physically and cognitively impaired with high support needs compared to those living in the community

  5. UK MRC Framework for Evaluating Complex Interventions Continuum of increasing evidence

  6. Residents with stroke Contractures- 59 (48%) Pressure sores- 24 (20%) Shoulder pain-59 (48%) Falls- 80 (66%) Other pain- 59 (48%) Phase 1 A survey of immobility related complications

  7. How do residents spend their days? walking with assistance 1.7% walking without assistance 0.3% standing 1.0% Sitting (eyes open or closed) 97.0% Sackley C. et al. 2006. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 13(8): 370-373.

  8. Staff feel they are employed to care Care viewed as ‘doing for’ rather than maintaining independence Would like to know more about basic rehab Phase 1 Staff Attitudes

  9. Care Home AHP provision Regional Survey • AHP provision in care homes: • At best, patchy • Rarely used qualified staff • Inequality in access (particularly Occupational Therapy) • Staff attitudes : • Staff feel they are employed to care • Care viewed as ‘doing for’ rather than maintaining independence • Staff showed an interest in learning about rehabilitation practices Sackley C.M. et al. 2001. Age and Ageing, 30(6): 532-3.

  10. OTCH Phase II exploratory trial Cluster RCT (n=118). Primary outcome: Barthel @ 3 months. Poor Outcome 20/63 (32%) were worse/dead in the intervention group compared with 31/55 (56%) in the control group. Group difference –25% (95% CI –51% to 1%), similar at 6 months. Self Care ADL BI score had increased by 0.6 (SD 3.9) in the intervention group and decreased by 0.9 (2.2) in the control group. Group difference 1.5 (95% CI –0.5 to 3.5). Mobility RMI score increased by 0.4 (3.0) in the intervention group decreased by –0.4 (1.9) in control. Group difference: 0.8 (95% CI –0.6 to 2.2). Sackley C. et al. 2006. Stroke, 37(9):2336-41.

  11. Meta-analysis: OT on personal activities of daily living Legg L.et al. 2007. BMJ, 335(7626):922.

  12. OTCH Phase III Cluster RCT

  13. Randomised (228 homes, 1042 participants) Allocated to Occupational therapy 114 homes, average size= 5, 568 participants Allocated to Control 114 homes, average size= 4·2, 474 participants Received allocation= 458 Did not receive allocation = 16 Reasons: 15 died, 1 withdrawal Received allocation= 545 Did not receive allocation = 23 Reasons: 16 died, 7 withdrawals 3 month assessment= 491 (96% retention) Primary outcome completed = 479 (113 care homes) 3 incomplete, 9 missing, 48 died, 1 withdrawal, 3 ineligible, 2 lost to follow-up • 3 month assessment= 416 ( 93% retention) Primary outcome completed= 391 (111 care homes) 12 incomplete, 13 missing, 37 died, 1 ineligible, 4 lost to follow-up 6 month assessment= 446 (90% retention) Primary outcome completed = 424 (111 care homes) 7 incomplete, 15 missing, 41 died, 4 withdrawals 4 lost to follow-up 6 month assessment= 380 (90% retention) Primary outcome completed= 369 (109 care homes) 2 incomplete, 9 missing, 33 died, 3 withdrawals, 4 lost to follow-up 12 month assessment= 386 (84% retention) Primary outcome completed= 355 (104 care homes) 14 incomplete, 17 missing, 54 died, 3 withdrawals, 3 lost to follow-up • 12 month assessment= 306 (83% retention) Primary outcome completed= 285 (100 care homes) 7 incomplete, 14 missing, 64 died, 5 withdrawals, 5 lost to follow-up

  14. Interventions 1 • Interventions: Short term (3 month) targeted OT to improve mobility & self-care independence • Information, advice & caregiver training • Activity & mobility training

  15. Interventions 2 • Interventions: Short term (3 month) targeted OT to improve mobility & self-care independence • Assistive devices & adaptations • Wheelchairs & seating reviewed Control: Standard care (not a lot)

  16. Summary of OTCH Intervention Framework • Employed a patient-centred goal-setting approach • Treatment regime developed using consensus professional opinion • 3-month intervention to improve mobility & self-care independence • Staff training was a key component. • Six Categories: • - Assessment, Reassessment and Goal Planning • - Communication • - ADL training • - Transfers and mobility (including wheelchairs) • - Adaptive equipment (including seating) • - Other (such as treating impairments)

  17. Barthel Index at Baseline

  18. Additional Participant Characteristics at Baseline

  19. Therapy Time Distribution • Visits = 2538 to N= 498 residents • Mean = 5.1 (SD 3.04) visits/resident • Median Duration = 30mins (IQR 15-60) • Six Categories: • - Assessment and Goal Planning: 23% • - Communication: 49% • - ADL training: 7% • - Transfers and mobility : 8% • - Adaptive equipment : 7% • - Other : 6%

  20. Primary & Secondary Outcomes @ 3 months

  21. Process EvaluationSummary • Embedded process evaluation to develop an explanatory account of how the intervention was implemented within the trial. • Interviews with trial therapists and critical incidents. • Four overarching mechanisms which characterised implementation: • (1) Balancing research and professional requirements, • (2) Building rapport with care home staff, • (3) Re-engineering the personal environments of care home patients, • (4) Therapists’ learning about the intervention and its impacts over time. • How these mechanisms operated was contingent on multiple factors such as the prior experience of therapists, and the contexts characterising the care homes included in the trial. • Masterson-Algar , et al. Journal of Evaluation and Clinical Practice, submitted.

  22. Health Economics Summary • The intervention costs more than the NICE cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000/QALY across all analyses. • Significant difference in cost /QALY between participants in nursing homes (£63k/QALY) compared with residential care (£28k/QALY). • Based on current cost-effectiveness thresholds, we would not endorse the OTCH programme.

  23. Summary • Neutral findings are deemed as robust . • Participant baseline characteristics were representative of the UK care home population, in regards to age, gender balance, levels of frailty and support needed. • The OT treatment offered to participants was similar to an NHS intervention, indicated by the OTCH process evaluation. • The evidence does not support the use of an OT package to increase or maintain abilities in personal activities of daily living, for an older care home population with stroke-related disabilities.

  24. Conclusions • These neutral findings are similar to those reported in other recently reported RCTs conducted in a care-home population (Underwood et al, 2013; Kerse et al, 2008). • These studies assessed the influence of exercise on depression ratings using the GDS, and the influence of functional activity on quality of life / frequency of falls. • Both trials reported either a neutral or a minimal effect, mediated by levels of cognitive impairment. • What are the next steps for research in this clinically complex population with high incidence of depression, cognitive and physical impairment?

  25. OT Intervention with John • Some of the ‘perks’ of being involved in stroke research… • John was interviewed by local TV news and enjoyed his 15 minutes of fame!

  26. OT Intervention with John • Some of the ‘perks’ of being involved in stroke research… • John met HRH Princess Anne when she visited the research unit

  27. OT Intervention with John • Some of the ‘perks’ of being involved in stroke research… • Notts County FC acknowledged his support with a lifetime season ticket and merchandise

  28. Acknowledgements

More Related