1 / 16

A Geographical Characterization of YouTube: a Latin American View

A Geographical Characterization of YouTube: a Latin American View. Fernando Duarte, Fabrício Benevenuto , Virgílio Almeida, Jussara Almeida Federal University of Minas Gerais – Brazil. Outline. Motivation and Goals YouTube Features Crawler and Sampling Geographical Characterization

Melvin
Télécharger la présentation

A Geographical Characterization of YouTube: a Latin American View

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Geographical Characterization of YouTube: a Latin American View Fernando Duarte, Fabrício Benevenuto, Virgílio Almeida, Jussara Almeida Federal University of Minas Gerais – Brazil

  2. Outline • Motivation and Goals • YouTube Features • Crawler and Sampling • Geographical Characterization • Conclusions and Future Work

  3. Motivation and Goals • YouTube is a popular online social video sharing service which generates high-volumes of Internet traffic • YouTube Popularity in Latin American (from www.alexa.com) • 6th in Argentina and Paraguay, • 5th in Brazil, Mexico, Chile and Peru, • 4th in Ecuador and Venezuela. • Goal: characterize influence of geographical localization of users on traffic and social relationship. • Focus on Latin American

  4. YouTube Features Users – videos • watch videos • upload videos (unlimited) • add videos as favorite • post a comment to a video • respond a video with another video • rating a video Users – users interactions • add users as friends • subscribe to another user Videos • Have a list of 20 related videos • are distributed in 14 categories

  5. Sampling Mechanism • Sampling Strategy: • collect information of popular videos and analyze the user interactions around these videos. • First crawler: Collect metadata information of Videos • Start from top all time viewed video and collect the related videos recursively in snowball fashion • Snowball uses a Breadth first scheme • Second Crawler: Collect metadata information of Users from the first crawler • User who uploaded videos, posted comments or video responses.

  6. Crawler Architecture • Parallel crawler • Server coordinates the snowball sampling and • Server avoids redundant data collection • 7 Linux boxes … Client 2 Client 7 Client 1 Server • Collected information of over 2 million videos, exhausting 6 tiers in 11 days (from Apr 3rd to 14th) • 96 of the 100 most all-time popular videos are part of the sample

  7. Statistics of videos and users collected • USA is responsible for 28% of videos and 38% of users • 7% of users are LA, responsible for 7% of uploads and 6% of views • 13% of users without country information (empty) • # views > # comments > # video responses

  8. Latin American Users • Table is sorted by number of users • Users from Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina have contributed with more videos, but in terms of uploads/user Peru leads the rank • In terms of traffic (wached videos) Brazil, Mexico, and Virgin Islands lead the rank • LA users have an average 22 favorite videos and average of 2 friends • Orkut and Myspace have an average of 30 and 137 friends respectively • We guess that most part of the users interact with friends in other online social network and use YouTube essentially to watch videos

  9. Video Popularity • Curve of number of views does not descend linearly • 10% of the top popular LA videos concentrate 76% of the views: caching • LA videos are less visualized and discussed, generating less traffic than other videos

  10. Video Duration • About 80% of the videos are smaller than 5 minutes • There is no difference for different regions

  11. Use of Social Features • LA users interact less at YouTube than other users.

  12. Use of Social Features • Besides less interactive, there are LA users with 2400 friends, users who uploaded 1400 videos and sent more than 1200 comments.

  13. User Interactions Latin American videos • Observe the percentage of comments for videos from LA, USA and others. • Plot the distribution of this percentage

  14. Textual Interactions Latin American videos USA videos • The probability of LA videos have more than 60% of comments from LA users is 0.32 (from USA is only 0.08) • Videos have higher probability to receive comments from same region • Potential use of CDNs (assuming that number of views is also influenced by geographical factors) • Few LA users interact with videos from USA/others, but USA/others interact with LA users

  15. Conclusions and Future Work • We present a geographical characterization of YouTube, highlighting a number of differences between Latin American users and other countries • Main Findings • Videos uploaded by LA users present different characteristics than videos uploads by users from other regions: less visualized and discussed. • Top popular videos concentrate most part of the views, suggesting the use of caching • Interactions present strong influence of geographical localization, suggesting the use of CDNs to improve performance • Future Work • Analyzing impact of language on traffic and user behavior • Explore social networks characteristics of interactions between users and videos across different regions

  16. Questions?fabricio@dcc.ufmg.br

More Related