1 / 38

Performance Assessment Assurances: Next Steps for Leading Deeper Learning in Virginia

Performance Assessment Assurances: Next Steps for Leading Deeper Learning in Virginia. Day 2: Elementary Breakout Facilitators: Tina Manglicmot, Anne Petersen (VDOE) Jim Malamut , Envision Learning Partners. Introductions. Name School, Division Your professional role

adamf
Télécharger la présentation

Performance Assessment Assurances: Next Steps for Leading Deeper Learning in Virginia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Performance Assessment Assurances: Next Steps for Leading Deeper Learning in Virginia Day 2: Elementary Breakout Facilitators: Tina Manglicmot, Anne Petersen (VDOE) Jim Malamut, Envision Learning Partners

  2. Introductions Name School, Division Your professional role Teaching area/grade level (past or present, if applicable)

  3. Goals for Breakout Session Day 2 Develop an understanding of Virginia Common Rubric in elementary science by applying it to score student work Experience a scoring process that could be used with educators in local divisions

  4. Suggested Norms for Today Be present and stay engaged Devices used for today’s activities only, except at breaks Challenge ideas, not people Be mindful of air time and make space for others Be incisive and honest Be respectful of the work in front of us – it is the real work of real educators AND students in Virginia Watch out for birdwalks Other?

  5. Module 4: Introduction to Common Rubrics What are the shifts in instruction and assessment design necessitated by the new Virginia common rubrics?

  6. 3rd Grade Science Laboratory Investigation (1 of 2) Common Rubric for Science Laboratory Investigation (Please see the electronic/paper copy of the full rubric for text within each cell of the rubric)

  7. 3rd Grade Science Laboratory Investigation (2 of 2) Six Dimensions • Asking Questions and Defining Problems • Planning and Carrying Out Investigations • Interpret, Analyze and Evaluate Data • Construct and Critique Conclusions and Explanations • Develop and Use Models • Obtain, Evaluate, and Communicate Information

  8. Science Rubric (1 of 2) Aligned to revised 2018 Science Standards of Learning Genre: Scientific Investigation Promotes best practices in science instruction Asking questions and defining problems Planning and carrying out investigations Interpreting, analyzing, and evaluating data Constructing and critiquing conclusions and explanations Developing and using models Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information

  9. Science Rubric (2 of 2) It is not intended that all skills be addressed in a single performance assessment Rubric to be used throughout an academic year Content embedded into skills and processes Multiple use of rubric with teacher feedback allows for mastery of science skills and processes Rubric reinforces best practices in science instruction

  10. Flashback in Science.... Laboratory Investigations Question:  A question that can be answered using data Hypothesis: A prediction Procedures:  Steps a student/scientist take to conduct an experiment. May be constructed by students as part of the experimental design process. Data Table:

  11. Flashback in Science: Graphs Graphs Title Labelled Axes Appropriate Scale

  12. Table Talk: Implications for Classroom Assessment & Instruction If the common rubrics represent the learning outcomes that are to be assessed across Virginia classrooms, what shifts will need to occur in how classroom assessments are designed? What would it mean for classroom instruction?

  13. A New Vision of Assessment in Virginia Assessments that… Require disciplinary thinking AND doing Are more cognitively complex and accommodate a variety of student responses Require application of concepts and practices; not simple regurgitation of knowledge

  14. A New Vision of Instruction in Virginia Instruction that… Changes students' role from a passive recipient of knowledge to an active learner, investigator, researcher Equips students to be self-directed, life-long learners Engages students in relevant, real-world, hands-on learning Engages students in big ideas of the discipline

  15. Performance Assessment: A Vehicle to Instruction "Assessment is a process, one in which information about learning is evoked and then used to modify teaching and learning activities in which teachers and students are engaged." (Black, 2003)

  16. Module 5: Understanding the Task through Students’ Eyes Purpose: Understand the demands of a performance tasks and anticipate challenges students may have in responding to the task. • Review the Performance Task: “Keep It Cool” • Use the tool: “Unpacking the Demands of a Performance Assessment”

  17. Unpacking the Demands of a Performance Assessment (25 min) • What do students need to know and be able to do to accomplish the task? • What language demands (function and form*) are embedded within the task? • What do you expect students to struggle with in this task?

  18. *Language Demand Types

  19. Unpacking the Demands of a Performance Assessment (25 min)Back to these questions: • What do students need to know and be able to do to accomplish the task? • What language demands (function and form*) are embedded within the task? • What do you expect students to struggle with in this task?

  20. Experience “Keep It Cool” Task as a Learner

  21. Break (10:30 - 10:45)

  22. Module 6: Analyze, Score, & Discuss Student Work Part A – Skim & Rank-order Samples (15 min) • See Handouts: Student Samples B2, B6, & B7 • Individually, read and sort/rank order them from highest to lowest • Compare notes with others at your table

  23. Sample B7 & B6 Master Scores • What evidence supports these scores? • What questions do you have about the rubric?

  24. Principles of Scoring Student Work (Please see the electronic/paper copy of the Principles) • Know the rubric. It is your Constitution... • Trust evidence, not intuition... • Match evidence to language in the rubric... • Weigh evidence carefully; base judgments on the preponderance of evidence... • Know your biases; leave them at the door...

  25. Principles of Scoring Student Work Continued (Please see the electronic/paper copy of the Principles) • Focus on what the student does, not on what the student does not do... • Isolate your judgment: One poor element does not equal a low-quality student work sample... • Resist seduction... • Stick to the rubric...

  26. Score Sample B2 • Review & individually score Sample B2. (10 min) • When you have completed scoring, chart your scores on the blank Charting Paper.

  27. Example of Charting Scores

  28. Discuss Sample B2 • Make observations of the pattern of scores given on the samples. Note areas of agreement and disagreement. • Focus discussion on areas of disagreement • Try to come to consensus on the scores. (15 min)

  29. Sample B2 Master Scores • Compare your group’s scores with the master scores • What questions do you have about the scores, evidence, or rubrics?

  30. INSTRUCTIONS FOR DIVISION TEAM TIME REFLECTION & PRODUCT

  31. LUNCH – Team Time12:30-1:15

  32. The Why – Student Voices Caleb Elementary student from Henry County, VA Listen to Caleb talk about testing

  33. The Why – Student VoicesFatima Elementary student from Henry County, VA Listen to Fatima talk about testing

  34. Module 7: Reflect on What is Learned from Student Work 1. Task Revision Lens How can evidence from student work be used to inform task (re)design work? 2. Instructional Implications Lens How can evidence generated by high-quality performance assessment inform what teachers do next?

  35. Task Revision Lens • What disciplinary (content area) practices and/or understandings did the samples demonstrate? • What intended disciplinary practices and/or understandings were not evident in the samples? • What features of the task allowed students to demonstrate targeted disciplinary practices/understandings? • What are potential barriers for special populations in handling this task? OR What accessibility concerns do you have for the students you work with? For subgroups?

  36. Instructional Implications Lens If the responses you reviewed had been from your own students, what would be your instructional next steps? What kinds of learning supports and/or feedback do you think students need to support their success on this and future performance assessments?

  37. Questions?

  38. BREAK2:00-2:15 Please reconvene in the whole group meeting space at 2:15 for Q&A with VDOE.

More Related