1 / 7

Working Group II

Working Group II. Consumer markets : EUTR implementation and increasing demand for sustainable tropical wood products. Implementation EUTR. Consistency in all MS: interpretation and enforcement : Transparency of CA: Key-performance indicators

adeola
Télécharger la présentation

Working Group II

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Working Group II Consumer markets: EUTR implementationandincreasingdemandforsustainabletropicalwoodproducts

  2. Implementation EUTR • Consistency in all MS: interpretationandenforcement: • Transparencyof CA: Key-performance indicators • DD-Standards: aspartof MO-application: recognitionby COM • Dealingwithcomplaints / substantiatedconcerns: CA; MO

  3. EUTR andcertification • Monitoring enforcement in MS: COM • Exchange withAuthorities in other countries (USA, Australia): MS • Certification: adaptionto EUTR ongoing: certifcationschemes • Usetheknowledgeofcertification also for non-certified material (supplychain): Operators

  4. Consumer markets / procurement • EU Member statesshouldestablishsustainabletimberpurchasingpolicies, obligingpublicauthoritiestodemandsustainabletimber (key open questions – inclusionof FLEGT, orstrictdefinitionofsustainable?) – governmentsshouldco-operate on thisprocess • Focus on capacitybuilding, forprocurersandthosemanagingcontractstoensureactualimplementation

  5. Consumer markets / procurement • Promote changeofperceptionfromtropicaltimber = badtimber, tosustainabletropicaltimber = goodtimber. Governmentstosupportmarketingcampaigns, andtoengage all keystakeholders (NGOs, traininginstitutions, construction professionals, retailcompanies, consumerorganisations • Constructionprocurementtogivepreferencetorenewablematerials, tocounterbalancethegreaterdifficultiesofmeetingsustainabletimberrequirements

  6. Session II WG 3: Opportunities & Risks • Timber: only 30% for wood products, 70% residues/wastes = opportunity for bioenergy, but “image” problem also for residues/wastes • Local use of bioenergy in wood processing can improve security of supply, and carbon footprint  higher product value • But use of residues might reduce low-cost fuelwood source  (social) risk of displacement • No evidence (yet) that EUTR increases sustainable wood market – “not enough”

  7. Session II WG 3: Threats and Counteractions • Due diligence = additional burden for producers (documentation, disclosure), no addional value • Develop certification systems further to provide “low-risk” category in DD • Export country governments “adopt” certification systems under FLEGT license to help DD – opportunity for competent authorities • Clear signal needed that sustainability will be required in the next step (3 years?), at least for public procurement

More Related