Analyzing Student Persistence: Insights from Focus Groups on Barriers and Interventions
This report examines the persistence rates of TCC’s first-time freshmen from their first to second semester, revealing that 25% were not retained. It utilizes student focus group data to identify barriers affecting academic persistence, including academic, service, and adjustment challenges. By analyzing both qualitative and quantitative data, the report proposes data-driven strategies and policy changes aimed at improving retention rates. The findings emphasize the importance of addressing common barriers to support student success, particularly among diverse demographics within the student body.
Analyzing Student Persistence: Insights from Focus Groups on Barriers and Interventions
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Student Focus Group Data Persistence: First Semester to Second Semester Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Four Components • What’s Wrong? 25% of TCC’s first-time freshmen were not retained to the second semester. • Why? Student Focus Group Data • Interventions Data-driven Strategies • Assessment Formative and Summative Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Goals • Persistence (Year 2 – 4 ) • Developmental Reading (Year 3 – 4 ) • Developmental Math (Year 4 ) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Questions • How do we revise current interventions to directly address common barriers? • What new interventions can be implemented to address common barriers? • What policy changes need to be made to address common barriers? Assess Impact Assessments Formative: • To what extent did interventions (or policy changes) effectively address common barriers? Summative: • To what extent did interventions increase persistence? Why? (Student Focus Group Data) Top Persistence Barriers/Challenges Qualitative Data Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Student Focus Groups Demographics: Gender Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Student Focus Groups Demographics: Ethnicity Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Student Focus Groups Demographics: Age Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Other Subgroups • 4% African American males in both AtD Cohort and focus groups • 44% Tulsa Achieves students • Mean average age was • 22.7 years for Focus Groups (more 18 year olds with Tulsa Achieves) • 24.5 years for AtD Cohort • Mean average age of non-Tulsa Achieves students was 25.8 years. Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Definition of Terms • Student Focus Group • Barrier/Challenge • Frequency • Cluster Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Student Focus Groups • Three focus groups per campus • 12 total groups • 101 total students • Students volunteered and were accepted if they had completed their first semester in Fall 2007 and had re-enrolled in Spring 2008. Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Barrier/Challenge • Barrier/Challenge “All students experience barriers or challenges as they make their way toward graduation.” • Common barriers include those experienced at TCC and those connected to life circumstances. Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Frequency • Barriers/Challenges - Frequency • By Raw Total • By Group • By Campus Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Cluster • Barriers seemed related to each other. • Data Team classified barriers into larger clusters or categories to provide the best overall picture of the data. Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
General Findings • No single barrier was mentioned in every focus group on all four campuses. • Many barriers occurred frequently and were identified on all four campuses. • Barriers specific to individual campuses did not occur frequently overall; College-wide barriers were identified far more frequently overall. Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Most Frequent Barriers/Challenges • Adjusting to college (19) • Balancing school and life (15) • Textbook issues (13) • Tulsa Achieves implementation issues (13) • Communication issues with instructors (12) • Choosing courses (8) All six barriers/challenges were identified on all four campuses. Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Specific Findings 82% of all barriers/challenges fell into one of three clusters: • Academic Barriers (63) • Service Barriers (53) • Adjustment Barriers (48) Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Academic Barriers (63) 63 Academic Barriers were grouped into two types: • Instructional Issues (33) • Student Issues (30) Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Academic Barriers Instructional Issues (33) • Communication issues with instructors (12) • Instructional quality (6) • Understanding instructor’s course requirements (6) • Instructor attitudes (2) Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Academic Barriers Student Issues (30) • Choosing courses (8) • Meeting academic workload (8) • Using Blackboard and MyTCC email (4) • Academically underprepared (3) • Lacking computer proficiency (3) • Course placement (3) • Choosing a major (1) Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Service Barriers (53) • Textbook issues (13) • Poor customer service (8) • Financial Aid service (8) • Confusing enrollment process (7) • Limited times and locations of classes (6) • Finding your way around campus (5) • Parking (5) • Inter-campus communication (1) Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Adjustment Barriers (48) • Adjusting to college (19) • Balancing school and life (15) • Time management (7) • Lack of motivation (7) Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Tulsa Achieves Implementation Issues • 13 barriers/challenges identified These were not included in the three clusters. • Examples: • Paying for textbooks • Financial aid processing • Information about TA changed and sometimes not accurate Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Goals • Persistence (Year 2 – 4 ) • Developmental Reading (Year 3 – 4 ) • Developmental Math (Year 4 ) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Questions • How do we revise current interventions to directly address common barriers? • What new interventions can be implemented to address common barriers? • What policy changes need to be made to address common barriers? Assess Impact Assessments Formative: • To what extent did interventions (or policy changes) effectively address common barriers? Summative: • To what extent did interventions increase persistence? • Why? • (Focus Group Student Data) • Top • Persistence Barriers: • 1. Adjusting to college • 2. Balancing school and life • 3. Textbook issues • 4. Tulsa Achieves implementation issues • 5. Communication issues with instructors • Choosing courses Student Focus Group Data: Persistence
Next Steps • TCC’s goal is to achieve a 3% increase in student persistence each year. • Based on the data, major barriers are selected for intervention and improvement. • Intervention and assessment strategies are then devised or modified for the selected barriers. Student Focus Group Data: Persistence