1 / 7

Magnet Schools and Desegregation Debate: Pro

Magnet Schools and Desegregation Debate: Pro. Anne Roberts and Casey Catron. BACKGROUND. Emerged in 1960s to remedy public segregation (DOE, 2004) Written into law: Section 5301 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Authorization

alcina
Télécharger la présentation

Magnet Schools and Desegregation Debate: Pro

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Magnet Schools and Desegregation Debate: Pro Anne Roberts and Casey Catron

  2. BACKGROUND • Emerged in 1960s to remedy public segregation (DOE, 2004) • Written into law: Section 5301 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Authorization • Modified to address de facto segregation in the 1970s (Ornstein, Levine, & Gutek, 2011)

  3. MAGNET SCHOOLS • Four Major Components (Rossell, 2012): • Special curricular theme • Role in voluntary desegregation • Choice of school by student & parent • Access to students beyond a regular attendance zone

  4. OPENING STATEMENT • POSITION: Magnet schools are an efficient practice to desegregate schools. They attract a diverse student population, while furthering their academic achievement. They provide for a happier staff, academically advanced student body and a more involved community.

  5. ADVANTAGES • A diverse student body • Specialized curriculum/ theme-based education • Distinguished faculty/theme-based training • Higher attendance rates • Higher graduation rates • Lower drop-out rates • Increased achievement scores • Increased parent and community involvement • Provides a feeling of a safer learning environment (Magnet schools ofAmerica,2007)

  6. CONSIDERATIONS • Magnet schools attract students of a diverse background as well as students outside of their designated schooling zone. In turn, this helps to diversify a school that would otherwise predominately be minorities. (Chen, 2007) • White students typically make up only 32% of the student body. (Meeks, Meeks & Warren , 2002) • Desegregation is typically acquired by white students choosing to enroll in the magnet school located in a minority schooling zone. (Crouch, 1999) • When students of low socioeconomic status attend a magnet school, they have higher achievement rates than similar students that remain in their zoned public school. (Chen, 2007) • 80% of magnet schools have an average reading and math proficiency score above their neighboring schools. (Crouch, 1999)

  7. References Crouch, M. (1999). Magnet Schools and Other Means of Desegregation. Poverty & Prejudice: Our Schools Our Children. Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/class/e297c/poverty_prejudice/school_child/hmagnet.htm Department of Education. (2004). Elementary & Secondary Education. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from: http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg65.html Magnet Schools of America (2007). What are magnet schools? Retrieved from http://www.magnet.edu/modules/info/what_are_magnet_schools.html Meeks, L., Meeks, W., & Warren , C. (2002). Racial Desegregation. Education and Urban Society, 33 (1), 88-101. Retrieved from http://www.sagepub.com/holt/articles/Meeks.pdf Ornstein, A. C., Levine, D. U., Gutek, G. L., & Vocke, D. E. (2011). Foundations   of Education. (11 ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub Co. Rossell, C. (2012). The Desegregation Efficiency of Magnet Schools. Urban Affairs Review, 38 (5), 697-725.

More Related