1 / 16

Class Representation For Advanced VLSI Course

Class Representation For Advanced VLSI Course. Instructor : Dr S.M.Fakhraie Student : Mohammad Ali Sedaghat Major Reference : An Analog GFSK Modulator in 0.35-m CMOS Hooman Darabi, Brima Ibrahim, and Ahmadreza Rofougaran IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference 2004.

aldis
Télécharger la présentation

Class Representation For Advanced VLSI Course

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Class Representation For Advanced VLSI Course Instructor : Dr S.M.Fakhraie Student : Mohammad Ali Sedaghat Major Reference : An Analog GFSK Modulator in 0.35-m CMOS Hooman Darabi, Brima Ibrahim, and Ahmadreza Rofougaran IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference 2004

  2. Outline • Introduction • Analog modulation Concept • Modulator circuit implementation • Experimental results

  3. Transmitter Architectures • Direct I-Q Up-Conversion2 • Better performance • More robust • Up-conversion mixers needed VCO/PLL Modulation1 Lower power Sensitive to KVCO variations Compromises PLL noise & settling time Potential frequency drift issues

  4. Conventional Modulator Implementation existing direct-conversion transmitters use a digital modulator at baseband consists of direct-digital frequency synthesizer (DDFS) followed by a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) • DAC is power consuming • DDFS/DAC switching degrades VCO clockphase noise • Direct analog implementation eliminates the DAC

  5. FM Differential Equation General FM Signal: Instantaneous Frequency: FM Differential Equation:

  6. GFSK Implementation • input data is first shaped (limit it’s spectral width) by a Gaussian filter in the time domain and then applied to the FM modulator • the modulator take the digital data at input, and a Gaussian filter with a bandwidth of half of the data rate will produce the desired Gaussian spectrum in the frequency domain

  7. Analog Modulator Circuit Implementation • Active-RC integrators are employed due to their superior dynamic range • RC calibration circuit adjusts the integrator gain by tuning the capacitors in the opamps’ feedback path • The opamps are two-stage differential amplifiers to drive the resistive load • multipliers, implemented as 4-FET switches • data edges are aligned with the 12-MHz system clock and a logic circuit produces complementary clock signals to drive the 4-FET switches • analog Gaussian low-pass filter following the modulator

  8. Amplitude Control Loop • To meet the spectrum mask requirements, the modulator • output swing must be well • defined • amplifier A followed by CA result in a CEQ=A*CA in parallel with the first integrator resistor that then creates a zero in the integrator transfer function Resulting in a phase shift in the integrator output that Depends on the sign of A is negative or positive, which in turn causes the modulator amplitude to grow or decay • Amplifier gain is a function of the difference between the modulator output swing and a reference voltage • Zero once the loop reaches the steady state

  9. Amplifier Circuit • The amplifier is a Gilbert-type current-steering circuit • Assuming the input transistors are square-law, in the vicinity of lock, the amplifier gain is linearly proportional to the difference between VR and VP Then the slope is a function of the amplifier device sizes and the total output resistance

  10. Amplitude Control Loop Dynamics • If VP-VR is small, the modulator amplitude is: where VPO is the initial amplitude • Loop behavior modeled by an integrator with gain of ωI : • Critically damped settling requires:

  11. Amplitude Modulation • Baseband implementation results in random amplitude modulation • in I-Q outputs. • Thus, a conventional peak detector which finds the highest voltage • fails to determine the output swing properly • Nonetheless, Complex power, , remains constant and is • equal to the peak amplitude

  12. Power Detector Circuit • the square-law property of a long-channel MOSFET is utilized to realize the power detector • Transistors M1–M4 are identical and are connected to the • differential I and Q signals The sum of their currents consists of following two terms squared 1-constant dc term 2-variable component proportional to the input amplitude The dc term is cancelled by the current source IB, and transistor M5

  13. Modulator Die Photograph 0.35 µm CMOS process Active area: 0.31 mm2

  14. Summary of Performance

  15. Conclusions • Direct up-conversion is robust and low-power • Analog implementation of modulator saves power • FM differential equation realizes the GFSK modulator in the analog domain • 􀀹Amplitude control loop is essential for low distortion • 􀀹Complex power detector is accurate and fast

  16. Refrences: [1]Hooman Darabi, Brima Ibrahim, and Ahmadreza Rofougaran “An Analog GFSK Modulator in 0.35-m CMOS” 2004 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference [2] Pilar Parra, Antonio Acosta, and Manuel Valencia “Reduction of Switching Noise in Digital CMOS Circuits by Pin Swapping of Library Cells1” Instituto de Microelectrónica de Sevilla-CNM / Universidad de Sevilla Avda. Reina Mercedes s/n, 41012-Sevilla, SPAIN [3] Alistair McEwan and Steve Collins “ANALOGUE INTERPOLATION BASED DIRECT DIGITAL FREQUENCY SYNTHESIS” Department of Engineering Science University of Oxford Parks Road Oxford UK

More Related