1 / 21

Outline

Israel as a Role Model for Global Innovation Prof. Dr. Liora Katzenstein Founder and President ISEMI College for Entrepreneurship Education Sofia, 30 October 2014. Outline. Financing Innovation Policy The Instruments Some Results Israel & Bulgaria Compared Conclusions for Bulgaria.

alfonso-collins
Télécharger la présentation

Outline

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Israel as a Role Model for Global InnovationProf. Dr. Liora KatzensteinFounder and PresidentISEMI College for Entrepreneurship Education Sofia, 30 October 2014

  2. Outline • Financing Innovation Policy • The Instruments • Some Results • Israel & Bulgaria Compared • Conclusions for Bulgaria

  3. Innovation Support Institutions1. Office of the Chief Scientist • Office of the Chief Scientist (OCS) at the Ministry of Industry and Trade - Created in early 1970s to encourage R&D based export-oriented industries - If R&D project results in a commercially successful product  sales royalty is payable until 100%-150% of the US-dollar value of the R&D grant has been repaid

  4. Innovation Support Institutions 2. Israeli Export Institute • Works with approximately 1,000 high tech start-ups per year • Offers information on every relevant topic • special focus on marketing and management • Initiates contacts with foreign investors and potential joint venture partners • Rents space in worldwide exhibitions, encouraging & assisting start-ups to participate

  5. Innovation Support Institutions 3. BIRD Foundation • Industrial cooperation between Israeli & US companies, est. 1997 • Most active of various international arrangements to finance joint R&D • Works closely with Chief Scientist, to evaluate tech merits of each project • Contributes, over 2-3 years, up to 50% of the approved cost of R&D • Should a project fail for any valid reason  no return of BIRD grant is due • Should commercial revenues result  BIRD receives a max 150% • Typical scenario for BIRD - Joint venture involving: • Israeli company with innovative technological abilities • American company which develops, manufactures, installs, and supports • Has an ongoing demand for new products for an established customer base in the U.S.

  6. Innovation Support Institutions 4. The Technological Incubators • Purpose & Operations • An answer to the influx of technologically trained former Russian immigrants • Under the aegis of the Chief Scientist • Infrastructure supported 100% by Government (US K300) • Structure dedicated to seed investments • A separate company, in which the investor is a partner for each project • Entrepreneurs expected to complete development & financing in 2 yearsObligation to return loans based on future success • Provides the following services • Assistance in determining the tech and market feasibility • Assistance in obtaining the financial resources needed • Assistance in forming and organizing an R&D team • Professional and administrative guidance & supervision • General and Administrative services http://www.incubators.org.il/

  7. Innovation Support Institutions 5. Yozma – Governmental VC fund • $100M allocated in 1991 by the Government to Yozma a fund of funds • Co-invested $US 8M in VC funds along with $US 12M brought by private investors • Private investors have the right to buy the government out after 6 years for nominal investment • 10 Yozma funds created • Privatized in 1998 • Catalyst for establishment of Israeli VC industry

  8. Investment in Innovation – TrendsFrom VC to Private Equity • Between 1990 – 2009, mostly Venture Capital funds (VC) • Over the years, VC funds were getting larger, until 2008 • Ability to invest in companies requiring significant input of funds • Better able to lead such investments • Prefer larger deals and more mature companies  affect those needing seed or start-up financing • Take positions on Boards of the companies in which they invest • Increased association with US investment banks • Access to considerable research resources • opportunity to springboard their start-ups into world markets

  9. Total Capital Raised By Israeli High-Tech Companies

  10. Total Capital Raised by Israeli VC Funds by Vintage Year ($b) 2003-2013 €

  11. Private Equity Deals by Quarter ($m)

  12. M&As and IPOs of Israeli High-Tech Companies, $b (2002-11)

  13. Entrepreneurship in IsraelSupporting Factors • The Specific Israeli/Jewish Background • The Israeli improvisation • East- European immigration • Individualistic character • Abundant venture capital • Generous government support schemes

  14. Entrepreneurship in IsraelLimiting Factors • Cost of capital, especially seed capital • Banks do not understand entrepreneurship • Problems with “Intrapreneurship” • Lack of team work ability (Despite army experience) • Treating competition with contempt • Product, not service, focus • Lack of punctuality, exactness & discipline • Lack of strategic focus

  15. Israel and Bulgaria ComparedSimilarities • Recently established democratic and free market nations (1990’s). • Share aspiration for technological leadership • Aspire for Global Presence

  16. Israel and Bulgaria ComparedDifferences (A) • Availability of local markets • Available for Bulgaria in East Europe • Not available in Israel • Exit Orientation • Israelis  IPO-oriented • Bulgaria  not IPO-oriented • Availability of capital • Israel  made available over the last 2 decades • Bulgaria  not available over many years

  17. Israel and Bulgaria ComparedDifferences (B) • Risk Aversion • Israelis are by nature not risk averse • Bulgarians are more risk averse • Government Orientation • Israeli government encourages and supports risk taking in a multitude of ways. • Bulgariangovernment is making efforts to adopt innovation policies.

  18. Elements for competitiveness for both nations • “The Global Individual with Local Roots” • Professional • Ethical • Visible • Cross-Cultural

  19. Conclusions for Bulgaria • Given the inherent limitations and facts provided… • Training & Education, mostly risk taking • Move from basic industry and services to sophisticated products • Cross-cultural Communication

  20. Thank you for listening! lkatzenstein@gmail.com Please ask any question you like!

More Related