1 / 5

Managing the Agricultural/Urban Interface 2011 CALAFCO Annual Conference Thursday, September 1, 2011 10:45 AM – 12:15 PM

Managing the Agricultural/Urban Interface 2011 CALAFCO Annual Conference Thursday, September 1, 2011 10:45 AM – 12:15 PM. Jon Edney, Moderator Commissioner, Imperial LAFCo Elisa Carvalho, Presenter Interim Executive Officer Yolo LAFCo . Marc Roberts, Presenter

almira
Télécharger la présentation

Managing the Agricultural/Urban Interface 2011 CALAFCO Annual Conference Thursday, September 1, 2011 10:45 AM – 12:15 PM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Managing the Agricultural/Urban Interface2011 CALAFCO Annual ConferenceThursday, September 1, 201110:45 AM – 12:15 PM • Jon Edney, Moderator Commissioner, Imperial LAFCo Elisa Carvalho, Presenter Interim Executive Officer Yolo LAFCo • Marc Roberts, Presenter Community DevelopmentDirector, City of Livermore Jurg Heuberger, Presenter Executive Officer Yolo LAFCo Planning Director, County of Imperial (Retired)

  2. Ideal Increasing Reality Managing the Agricultural/Urban Interface Agriculture Open Space Agriculture Open Space Urban Urban Exploring the challenges and opportunities in facilitating orderly urban growth while protecting open space and agricultural resources. Challenges in Managing an Interface Growth pressures (continued population increases) Economic pressures (greenfield development brings in more $$$) Politics (different councils/boards bring different philosophies) Williamson Act Contracts (going, going, gone?) Opportunities in Managing an Interface Planning tools (spheres, zoning, ordinances (numerical caps)) Ballot tools (urban growth boundaries) Increasing public interest in conservation

  3. Managing the Agricultural/Urban Interface Important Context: Part One…The Big Picture Not All Lands Are Equal Effectively managing the interface is a real challenge for all California counties as urban development continues to encroach on the state’s “important farmland” as defined by the California Department of Conservation (CDC) to include (a) prime farmland, (b) farmland of statewide importance, (c) unique farmland, and (d) farmland of local importance. Trending Dangerously Since it began preparing biennial reports in 1984, CDC calculates more than 1.3 million acres of important farmland in California has been converted for non-agricultural uses with four-fifths (1.0 million) becoming urbanized. The rate of important farmland losses in California since 1984 represents one square mile every four days, resulting in an area larger in size than Merced County. On the affirmative side, the rate of important farmland losses in California since 2000 (i.e. the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Act) has declined to one square mile every 13 days, equaling an area the size of San Francisco City/County. Don’t get too comfortable because if the current trend continues all of California’s important farmland will be entirely lost by the year 2700.

  4. Managing the Agricultural/Urban Interface Important Context: Part Two… The Local Picture Population Growth and Agricultural Land Losses are Explicitly Tied The 10 most populous counties in California have collectively lost 133,115 acres of important farmland since 2000. This amount, equally the size of Napa County, represents 91% of the total important farmland loss in California during the period.

  5. Managing the Agricultural/Urban Interface Now on to the Presentations… Exploring different approaches in “balancing” agricultural and urban uses through three distinct viewpoints: (a) LAFCo, (b) city, and (c) county. Elisa Carvalho Interim Executive Officer, Yolo LAFCo Marc Roberts Community Development Director, City of Livermore Jurg Heuberger Executive Officer, Imperial LAFCo Planning Director, County of Imperial (Retired)

More Related