1 / 27

Four parts to presentation

People In Aid International HR Conference 8 th February 2008, Geneva Changes in the humanitarian environment: how well are we coping? John Mitchell, ALNAP. Four parts to presentation. Forces that shape today’s humanitarian environment and the steps taken to keep pace.

amalia
Télécharger la présentation

Four parts to presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. People In Aid International HR Conference 8th February 2008, GenevaChanges in the humanitarian environment: how well are we coping?John Mitchell, ALNAP

  2. Four parts to presentation • Forces that shape today’s humanitarian environment and the steps taken to keep pace. • Has performance improved as a result? • Factors that make it difficult for agencies to improve. • The key ingredients for success.

  3. Part 1 Key Trends • Increased number and scale of emergencies, coupled with increased funding • Increased number and variety of international responders • Shrinking ‘humanitarian space’ • System response: regulation of humanitarian space • Organisational response: changes in structures and operating procedures • The new humanitarian professional – enabled or burdened?

  4. Increasing numbers of disasters Source: Red Cross/Red Crescent Climate Guide (2007)

  5. Changes in bilateral humanitarian assistance, compared with overall overseas development assistance, 1975 onwards Source: Development Initiatives at http://globalhumanitarianassistance.org/gha2006.htm

  6. Increasing numbers and variety of international responders

  7. ‘…more crises, with more interlocutors combined with more agencies with more capabilities’ (Weiss and Hofmann).

  8. Shrinking of ‘humanitarian space’ • The three D’s: Defence, Development and Diplomacy • Joint Evaluation of Emergency Assistance to Rwanda (1996)

  9. System Response • Good humanitarian donorship • Guiding principles for public/private collaboration in humanitarian action (2008) • Framework convention on civil defence (2000) and Oslo guidelines (2006) • Operational protocols on security and safety (2005) • International Disaster Response Law (ongoing)

  10. Organisational Response

  11. Organisational Response – cont’d Structural changes

  12. Continuing Metamorphosis of the new Humanitarian Practitioner: Some New Colours for an Endangered Chameleon • ‘These include: informed political analysis; negotiation skills; conflict analysis management and resolution; propaganda monitoring and humanitarian broadcasting; a broader understanding of vulnerability to include notions of political, ethnic, gender and class based vulnerability; human rights monitoring and reporting; military liaison; and personal security and staff welfare’ (Hugo Slim, Disasters Vol 19 Issue 2 1995).

  13. Enabled or burdened?

  14. Part 2 Pessimistic view 1 • ‘the international system needs a fundamental reorientation from supplying aid to supporting and facilitating communities own relief and recovery practices’

  15. Pessimistic view 2 • Tony Vaux: Proportion and distortion in humanitarian assistance • ‘aid is still not being directed where it is needed’ • ‘the Red Cross Code is the industry standard but is being breached on a massive scale’ (pp76)

  16. Pessimistic view 3 • Failure to protect • ‘looking at Darfur, seeing Rwanda’ General Romeo Dalliare • ‘ ..this chapter reaches the judgement that the humanitarian system acquitted itself poorly during the crisis…’ (Larry Minear, Lessons learned: the Darfur experience, pp 74)

  17. Relatively optimistic view • positive signs from the 3 Cs - CAP, CERF and Clusters? • no sign of funding fatigue • good progress on use of cash based responses

  18. Glass half empty? • .. a largely negative conclusion remains unavoidable: that the institutional weight of past practice is giving way all too slowly to the insights of creative practitioners’ (Larry Minear, ALNAP RHA in 2004)

  19. Part 3. Organisational change - challenges for the humanitarian agency • vision and strategy • business processes • structure and differentiation • staffing • culture

  20. Vision and Strategy • ‘There is a disjuncture between those who believe that humanitarian action is about traditional humanitarian response – that is feeding hungry people, providing them with basic healthcare, water and shelter, whilst respecting the norms of impartiality and neutrality – and those who believe that …humanitarian action must also be about protection, human rights, and gender equality’ (David Reiff). ‘the change agenda is not a noble one… and it is the duty of staff to resist such change’

  21. Business Processes • Weak incentive to deliver

  22. Structure and Differentiation • Hard to be inclusive

  23. Staffing • Unplanned turnover • Hard to manage performance

  24. Culture • Locked into programme cycle • Tendency to overlook people

  25. Part 4. Key ingredients for success • Examples of successful change • DFID: financial commitment improved • Action Aid: rights based/decentralised approach • WFP: shift in culture/attitude towards needs assessment • IFRC: decentralisation of regional directors

  26. Four key ingredients for success • a) Creating clarity – why change? • b) Providing incentives for change • c) Strong leadership • d) Collective change • ‘overcoming peoples uncertainties and fears’ • ‘creating incentives for change’

  27. ‘everybody thinks to change the world; • nobody thinks to change himself’

More Related