160 likes | 181 Vues
This portfolio focuses on improving the management effectiveness of protected areas, mainstreaming biodiversity, and capacity building on access and benefit sharing. It includes strategic programs on biosafety, invasive alien species, policy and regulatory framework, and sustainable financing.
E N D
Current Biodiversity portfolio: size, value 25 PIRs 2008 18 21 PIRs 2007 14 11 11 14 12 PIRs 2006 9 PIRs 2005
Current Portfolio: Impacts • improving the management effectiveness of83 protected areaswith a total area of over14 millionhectares; • 7 new PAs established covering1.2 millionhectares • mainstreaming biodiversity into9 millionhectares;working with agriculture (10), fishery (1), tourism (9), forestry (6), mining (1), NTFP (1).
METT conducted in 52 sites in 12 countries: 49% scores improvement
BIODIVERSITY FOCAL AREA GOAL: Conservation and Sustainable Use of biodiversity and maintenance of the ecosystem goods and services that biodiversity provides to society Strategic Objective 4: Capacity Building on Access and Benefit Sharing Strategic Objective 3: Safeguarding Biodiversity Strategic Objective 2: Mainstreaming bd conservation in production landscapes/seascapes and sectors Strategic Objective 1: Catalyzing Sustainability of Protected Area Systems • Strategic Programs: • Capacity Building on Access and Benefit Sharing • Strategic Programs: • Biosafety • Invasive Alien Species • Strategic Programs: • Policy and Regulatory Framework • Fostering Markets for Ecosystem Goods and service • Strategic Programs: • Sustainable Financing • Marine Protected Areas • Terrestrial Protected Areas OPERATIONAL PROGRAMS STILL VALID IN GEF IV (1, 2, 3, 4 and 13)
PROGRAMMING PRIORITIESfor GEF IV • Protected Area Financing: Serbia, Ukraine, Bulgaria, Georgia • Steppe Conservation through PA or mainstreaming approach in: Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Russia • Expansion of Marine Protected Areas: Russia, Turkey, Montenegro • Expansion of PAS to cover unrepresented ecosystems: Turkmenistan, Russia, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Carpathians, Moldova • Mainstreaming biodiversity into: spatial planning (Bosnia), fishery: (Kyrgyzstan); agriculture: (Tajikistan);
Submissions Schedule for 2007: MSPs: PIFs (8) and Briefs (5) • March:Bulgaria: Grasslands • July: Turkey: Forests; Bosnia: Peatlands; Kyrgyzstan: Fishery; Macedonia: PA System • November - December: Uzbekistan: SPAs; Georgia: PA Financing, Montenegro: PA System; Turkmenistan: PA System, Romania: Carpathians PA , Bosnia, Turkey and Kyrgyzstan (if PIF approved). • Still fighting for Lithuania and Latvia’s eligibility for the Baltic MPA FSPs: PIFs (5) and CEO endorsement (2) • 15 August: Russia: Komi; Ukraine: PA Financing • 15 October: Kazakhstan: Steppe; Russia: MPAs • 15 November: Tajikistan: Agrobiodiversity; Turkey: MPAs (pending on response for forests) • December: for CEO endorsement: Russia: Komi and Ukraine: PA finance (if PIF approved)
Submissions Schedule for 2008: MSPs: PIFs • January: Serbia: PA financing, Moldova: PA System IF INTERESTED IN NEW PIFs January – July is the best time – before the big submission start • After July: Bulgaria: PA Finance FSPs: PIFs • April WP: Kazakhstan: Steppe; Russia: MPAs, Tajikistan: Agrobiodiversity; Turkey: MPAs – will be considered For CEO endorsement (if PIF approved) • February: Uzbekistan: SPA, • July: Georgia: PA finance • September: Kazak Steppe, Russia MPA • November: Turkmenistan: PAS • December: Turkey: MPAs, Bulgaria: PA Finance
NO PROGRAMMING FOR GEF IV: • Albania – might work for second part of GEF IV, as WB took the first; • Armenia – PA opportunities • Azerbaijan – PA opportunities • Belarus – mainstreaming opportunities IF INTERESTED LET’S DISCUSS
COMPULSORY INDICATORS FOR PA PROJECTS • METT • Financial Scorecard • Institutional Capacity Scorecard • Number of new protected area established (if SP2 or SP3) • Number of hectares of improved conservation management
How to write a PIF ON BIODIVERSITY? • Global significant biodiversity • Threats • Why is the BD important to the government? • Opportunities: Government strategy to protect biodiversity • Normative solution – ideal • Barriers to achieving normative • What is the project proposing? • Which are the global environmental benefits expected? • How many PAs will be established (for SP2 and SP3 projects) – hectares covered • Incrementality • Cost-effectiveness: other options considered