1 / 12

Social Dimensions of Telecollaborative Foreign Language Study

Explore the social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study using a socio-cognitive investigation approach known as social realism. This presentation discusses the importance of recognizing culturally and historically shaped nature of learners in the language learning process.

andersonphilip
Télécharger la présentation

Social Dimensions of Telecollaborative Foreign Language Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Social Dimensions of Telecollaborative Foreign Language Study Julie A. BelzThe Pennsylvania State Univeristy Presentation by Kathryn Sederberg, Nov 2008

  2. CALL – Computer Assisted Language Learning • Research so far: • Pedagogical, structural • Not cultural, historical, social dimensions • “the social turn” • Recognizes culturally and historically shaped nature of learners • Recognizes learning and teaching processes in which they are situated

  3. Telecollaboration • The application of global communication networks in foreign language education • Social dimensions of languge learning and use • Learner agency

  4. Socio-cognitive investigation • Brings together • Siociocultural, ethnographic, qualitative data sources • Psycholinguistic, linguistic, and quantitative data sources • “social realism” (Archer, Layder) as an approach to the exploration and interpretation of social action

  5. Social realism • Theoretically: • Empirical world is highly complex and multi-faceted • Social action is shaped by an intimate interplay of macro level (social context, setting) and micro-level (linguistic interaction and psycho-biography) • Social action is embedded within history and power relations

  6. Social realism, cont. • Methodologically: • Reflects complex and layered nature of empirical world • Bedrock of interpretive work (interviews, participant observation), but also quantitative data • Tries to keep “scientific attitude” towards social analysis without ignoring the importance of actors’ meanings

  7. Belz’ method • Social realist investigation • Relationships between structure and agency • Ex: transatlantic email correspondence • Focus on inter-relationship of broader context of telecollaboration and language learning and language use in telecollaboration

  8. Research map: multi-strategy research in German-American telecollaboration

  9. Actual Project: Phases • Phase I (US students) • Biographical sketches, university information • Read first set of parallel texts, films • Phase II (German and US students) • Form pairs or groups based on mutual interests • Discuss and analyze parallel texts with partners via email (both in English and German) • Phase III (German and US students) • Merge to form larger groups • Develop a web site with bilingual essay pertaining to parallel texts, and a bilingual discussion of cultural construct from multiple perspectives • Phase IV (German students) • Final discussion

  10. Level of Context • Language Valuation • German vs. English • Discrepancy in proficiency • Learning expectations/perceived learning outcomes • Technological Access and Know-How • Institutional Level of Setting • Course accreditation • American perspectives (ie frustrations) • German perspectives

  11. Discussion, Conclusions • Context • Nat’l differences in technological know-how, access • Setting • Institutional differences • Multidirectional Interaction of Context, Setting, Situated Activity, and Self • Social realism (role of the individual in all this)

  12. Telecollaborative Best Practices • Main cultural learning not related to tasks assigned • Projects should be designed to minimize the logistical difficulties to shift learning to task • OR: should the cultural faultlines inherent in this project be allowed to surface and function as the main point of intercultural learning? • Pedagogical intervention (“clash of faultlines” shouldn’t be smoothed over, but encouraged, yet not in a counterproductive way) • More cultural work at beginning

More Related