SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Memory Recall Differences Between Person and Environment Contexts in Speech Recognition Study

angelica-figueroa avatar
22 diapositives · 338 Views · Nov 19, 2014

This study examines memory recall variations in speech recognition tasks between different contexts involving a day care supervisor and environmental cues. Participants were required to recall word pairs and individual words associated with each context. Significant results and non-significant findings are discussed, highlighting factors influencing retrieval conditions and memory performance.

Memory Recall Differences Between Person and Environment Contexts in Speech Recognition Study - slide 1
01 / 22Memory Recall Differences Between Person and Environment Contexts in Speech Recognition Study
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Memory Recall Differences Between Person and Environment Contexts in Speech Recognition Study
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. VR Context Study Graphs For Jeremy

  2. Abstract

  3. Design • 2 conditions • Environment (Speech recognition) • Person (Day care supervisor) • 2 contexts per condition • Read 8 words per context • Hear a response to each word • Recall word pairs for each context • Recognize individual words for each context

  4. Environment

  5. Person (Female)

  6. Person (Male)

  7. Round 1 Round 2 Say:Hear Say:Hear house:door nose:face old:death kiss:touch lava:fire lion:teeth rabbit:ears bird:tree arm:foot church:book hit:family woman:skirt water:shark venom:snake flower:stem beetle:wing

  8. Significant results..

  9. Pair recall • Criteria for correct: • Both heard and said word recalled (and recalled as associated to one another) • Had to remember which was said and heard. • Also had to recall which person/environment the pair came from.

  10. Word recall • Criteria: • Single word memory • Did not have to remember pair, who said, or which person/context it came from.

  11. Recall/Recognition as a factor

  12. Retrieval condition as a measure

  13. Non-Significant Resultsof Interest • Overall rate of recall the same in the person and environment conditions. • True when analyzing single word memory, paired word memory. • Undermines explanation that differences in retrieval were due to more “elaboration” in the person condition (if so, there should be a main effect on total recall). • Arousal and peopleness of terms did NOT interact significantly in any analysis.