1 / 31

COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH IN THE PANTHER CREEK WATERSHED: WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREGON

COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH IN THE PANTHER CREEK WATERSHED: WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREGON. George McFadden Oregon State Office Bureau of Land Management george_mcfadden@blm.gov. PANTHER CREEK WATERSHED. Ball Bearing Mountain 2265 ft. Carlton City Reservoir 575 ft.

anneke
Télécharger la présentation

COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH IN THE PANTHER CREEK WATERSHED: WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREGON

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH IN THE PANTHER CREEK WATERSHED: WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREGON George McFadden Oregon State Office Bureau of Land Management george_mcfadden@blm.gov

  2. PANTHER CREEK WATERSHED Ball Bearing Mountain 2265 ft. Carlton City Reservoir 575 ft.

  3. COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PARTNERS • Bureau of Land Management * • Environmental Protection Agency * • Natural Resource Conservation Service * • Weyerhaeuser Company * • U.S. Forest Service, PNW Research Station * • Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries * • City of Carlton • McMinnville Water and Light

  4. COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PARTNERS • Forest Capitol Partners • Oregon State University * • Portland State University • Seattle Biometrics * • Watershed Sciences * • Hampton Affiliates • Yamhill Basin Council * Core Research Organizations

  5. PANTHER CREEK RESEARCH OBJECTIVES • Develop LiDAR stand level inventory methods • Conduct a systematic soil sample • Develop methods to predict distribution of soil carbon • Characterize Panther Creek slope stability • Characterize Panther Creek soil chemistry • Assess effects of forest / land use management on carbon storage

  6. PANTHER CREEK COLLABORATION TENANTS • All data is part of the public record • Research in landowner blind • Each collaborator funds the research where they have interest • Data sharing and external analysis is encouraged

  7. DISCRETE RETURN LIDAR COLLECTION SCHEDULE • Leaf on 2007 Complete • Leaf off 2007 Complete • Leaf off 2008 (2009) Complete • Leaf off 2009 (2010) Complete • Leaf on 2010 Scheduled • Leaf off 2010 (2011) Planned • Leaf off 2011 (2012) Planned

  8. DISCRETE RETURN LIDAR SPECIFICATIONS

  9. DISCRETE RETURN LIDAR EFFECTIVENESS Source: Watershed Sciences Report 1/22/2010

  10. DISCRETE RETURN LIDAR EFFECTIVENESS

  11. DISCRETE RETURN LIDAR EFFECTIVENESS

  12. 2010 LEAF ON FLIGHT REQUIREMENTS • Discrete return LiDAR at 8 pulses per square meter • Hyperspectral digital imagery at up to 256 bands, probably 24 to 30 bands • Wavelength return LiDAR • Imagery co-registration with products from 2010 leaf on flight

  13. 2010 LEAF ON FLIGHT REQUIREMENTS

  14. PANTHER CREEK GROUND PLOTS

  15. VEGETATION SAMPLE PLOTS • 42 1/5 acre circular plots • Grid cells stratified into 3 by 3 block based upon tree height and canopy cover • 9 plots randomly located, 1 per block • 1 plot randomly located in mixed hardwood / conifer strata • 3 additional plots randomly located in each “stand” where a random plot is located • 2 additional plots randomly located in riparian stands

  16. VEGETATION PLOT VARIABLES • Species • Status (live or dead) • DBH • Total height • Height-to-live-crown • Lean percent (> 10%) • Dead top • Location (x,y) coordinates

  17. SOIL PIT PLOTS • Three soil pits will be randomly selected in each of the 10 to 12 dominant kinds of soils in Panther Creek • 1/5 acre plot established at each of the 36 soil pit locations selected in Panther Creek • 36 total plots / Only 35 associated with soil pits as one pit location is on a skid road and was not installed but the vegetation plot was installed • Measurements the same as vegetation plots

  18. PANTHER CREEK SAMPLE PLOTS

  19. PLOT 1093003

  20. PLOT 1093003

  21. PLOT 1093003

  22. PLOT 1093003

  23. SOIL SAMPLES

  24. SOIL SAMPLES

  25. SOIL VARIABLES SAMPLED • Acid oxalate extractable Fe, Al & Si • Active soil carbon (AC) • Aggregate stability • Bulk density • Calcium carbonate equivalent • Cation exchange capacity (CEC) • Clay mineralogy via x-ray diffraction • Dithionite-citrate extractable Fe, Al & Si • Effervescence in 1N HCl • Extractable acidity (BaCl2-TEA)

  26. SOIL VARIABLES SAMPLED (CONT) • Exchangeable cations (Na, K, Ca, Mg) • KCl extractable NH4+ & NO3- • Micromorphology – thin section • Mineral content • New Zealand phosphorus retention • Optical analysis – glass count • Particulate organic matter (POM) • p-Nitrophenol, β-Glucosidase • pH in NaF • pH in water & CaCl2

  27. SOIL VARIABLES SAMPLED (CONT) • Particle size analysis (sand, silt and clay) • Total N, C & S • Water retention (0.06 Bar) • Water retention (0.1 Bar) • Water retention (0.33 Bar) • Water retention (1 Bar) • Water retention (2 Bar) • Water retention (5 Bar) • Water retention (15 Bar)

  28. WEATHER INSTRUMENTS • RAWS Station Installed Spring 2010 • Soil Pits (36) Installed Spring 2010 • Air Temperature • Relative Humidity • Soil Moisture • Soil Temperature

  29. LANDSLIDE ANALYSIS

  30. LANDSLIDE ANALYSIS Landslide inventory mapping is greatly improved using high resolution (~8pts/m2) LiDAR data collected during leaf-on and/or leaf-off conditions In Panther Creek identified landslides went from 7 to 93 Great care is needed when using differential LiDAR DEMs to map, quantify, and interpret elevation change caused by landslides In Panther Creek 90 % of high confidence sites were active landslides but only 10 % of low confidence sites were active landslides Source: Burns, W.J., Coe, J.A., Kaya Sener, K, Ma, L., 2009. Analysis of Elevation Changes Detected from Multi-Temporal LiDAR Surveys in Forested Landslide Terrain in Western Oregon. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 41, No. 7, p. 379

  31. DATA SHARING METHODOLOGY Seattle Biometrics maintains a password protected website where core researchers upload raw data sets for storage and archiving Oregon State University is developing a public website with project descriptions, sample designs, list of publications and a selected sample of raw data Bureau of Land Management will distribute the archived raw data upon request and submission of a portable hard drive for data transfer

More Related